Since when can a federal judge take over the U.S. Government?

[Jmac00]

It seems to me, more & more Federal judges are interfering with the executive and judicial branches of the .gov? Why is this allowed to happen, who gave these unelected judges the power to over ride the DOJ?

Judge Halts Deportation of Columbia University Pro-Palestinian Protest Leader

A judge has intervened to stop the federal government from immediately deporting a Palestinian student who led pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia University.

www.theepochtimes.com

A federal judge in New York has temporarily blocked any effort by the Trump administration to deport Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian student and permanent resident who led pro-Palestinian encampment protests at Columbia University after the deadly Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by the Hamas terrorist group.

U.S. District Judge Jesse M. Furman of the Southern District of New York ordered on March 10 that Khalil—who was arrested over the weekend—must not be deported until further legal proceedings have played out and the court potentially authorizes his removal from the United States.
“To preserve the Court’s jurisdiction pending a ruling on the petition, Petitioner shall not be removed from the United States unless and until the Court orders otherwise,” Furman wrote.

 

[Koz]

Since USAid and Soros became the piggy bank for the election of these rogue, commie judges and DAs.

 

[tirwin1]

The left did. In reality we do not have 3 co-equal branches of government. We are ruled by the federal court system and the supreme court has the final say on all matters. That's why the left is obsessed with controlling it and why they perverted the law schools of america with woke crap. What the left can't get via the executive or legislative branches they will get via the judicial.

 

[Saltwater60]

One would guess he was here on student visa so that begs the question did he violate his visa terms? I’d think being arrested would do that

 

[dsdmmat]

Have the Supreme Court remove activist judges and the justice department charge them with criminal negligence.

 

[Koz]

Have the Supreme Court remove activist judges and the justice department charge them with criminal negligence.

Sadly some of those "activist judges" actually sit on the SCOTUS!

 

[Depick]

Once I saw “judge in New York” I knew the answer.

 

[Zerex]

Judge Robert Jackson, who was the chief prosecutor at Nuremberg, sat on the SCOTUS..............he once said, in reference to this exact situation, in TERMINIELLO

Robert Jackson

Robert Jackson, a Supreme Court justice from 1941 to 1954, believed strongly in separation of church and state and free speech protections First Amendment.

firstamendment.mtsu.edu

The Consititution is not as suicide pact with itself................we can deport, imprison, kill maim and destroy, the vermin who threaten our Republic..........

 

[Bigfoot]

Ensuring the Enforcement of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c)

MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES Subject: Ensuring the Enforcement of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c) In recent

www.whitehouse.gov

 

[VietnamEraVet]

Once I saw “judge in New York” I knew the answer.

Disclaimer: for legal reasons, the content of this post is my opinion.

During my 60 years in New Yorkistan, I recall having dealt with at least seven (7) Supreme Court Judges. Of the first four that come to mind, two were 100% corrupt and are now retired, and possibly dead. The third seemed honest, but retired before deciding the case, and was replaced by a young, and absolutely corrupt POS who will be on the bench for another couple of decades at least (Ugh).

One was borderline IMHO, and I will withhold my opinion of him. He is now off of the bench.

Two others were 100% honest when I dealt with them. One of those two is now deceased. The other is still on the bench, and doing the right thing daily for the parties who come before him, but his time remaining on the bench is coming to a close soon due to his age.

One of my former lawyers (I fired him because he turned out to be dishonest with me, - and gutless) has since been appointed to the NY Supreme Court bench, which is very sad IMHO. I would hate to be a plaintiff coming before him, because he is not likely to do the right thing.

Edit: Better make that eight (8), I forgot to mention one from my divorce: I spent three (3) years fighting in her court for full residential custody of my kids. I finally won, but it was a painful and costly shitshow.