They admitt that's the reason for you having to renew your pistol permit and have since the beginning. I don't agree with it. And no they do not already have your dl and pp linked as of today
Sorry Salt, but I have to disagree with you about them being linked up as of today. My "interactions" with my local PD have shown that they are in fact linked up, and a senior officer of the same PD confirmed to me that the information was in fact showing up on their screens during traffic stops, as well as when they drove past us using their license plate scanners. He told me that they were getting audible hits whenever their scanner read a tag of a licensed CCW holder.
Also, as I had posted on the old place, NY has provided a database link to Canada on NY handgun owners.
Lastly, while it was interesting to read about PA and their law restricting disclosure,- as well as specified penalties for it,- which they are ignoring.... I also found the same thing here in NY. Even though I filed my non disclosure form with the Erie County PPO, my local PD totally violated that. In fact, I even have a copy of one of their DI reports where a detective disclosed the existance of my permit to people who then came to my house and menaced me a week later!
Of course, I have yet to find a lawyer with big enough balls to want to take them on over it. Seems like a slam dunk to me, but what do I know...
I also asked him about 6 months ago if it showed up on their traffic stops and another local cop, they both said no it does not show up on their computer. So maybe some do and some don't.
I wonder if that could be a bluff, sort of like "Have you been drinking tonight"? For those states where it is illegal to link the two systems, there is nothing to prevent "notes" being entered into a PD database that could be checked during the License plate verification. Over the years, many CCW holders could be tagged just through interactions at traffic stops and presto - you get pulled over and the officer knows you have a CCW as soon as he runs your plate. Not unlike how some companies have the ability to flag problem customers in their systems.
On 2nd thought, that all sounds like a lot of work, when ignoring the law is so much simpler.
So, if it doesn't alert you that he's a gun owner, do you act differently ?That's interesting because I was just talking with my dad a week or two ago and he currently is a detective and he was just saying how he was at a domestic violence training and it would be nice to have an alert if the offender had guns. He was just saying there was a case recently where a township nearby missed that some one had guns because they had to look somewhere else and that person was murdered. I also asked him about 6 months ago if it showed up on their traffic stops and another local cop, they both said no it does not show up on their computer. So maybe some do and some don't. Anyway it will be done soon so I can't wait for more privacy laws to be broken I love the land of the free.
I'm sure they would act differently since they know you have a gun. I get you point though as they should treat everyone as a potential life threatening situation.So, if it doesn't alert you that he's a gun owner, do you act differently ?
Because I'm thinking that sort of complacency will get someone killed, after all the most dangerous gun owners don't show up in any database, Jamal on the corner doesn't keep very good records.
Then, if you aren't going to act differently based on the results of this search, what's the value in the, search to begin with ?