Supreme Court slaps FUAC on church restrictions, Barrett provides key vore
- Thread starter C3D
- Start date
ArmedCorgi
.475 A&M Magnum
Meanwhile, it takes years for a gun case to get to the supreme court.
Blimey
.450/400 Nitro Ex
wish they’d stop selling Roberts a conservative.
scary that it was another 5-4. covid is a real problem but either the constitution matters or it doesn’t.
scary that it was another 5-4. covid is a real problem but either the constitution matters or it doesn’t.
Supreme Court blocks strict COVID-19 restrictions on New York houses of worship
It was a reversal from earlier actions taken by the high court in response to state restrictions on organized religion during the pandemic.
www.google.com
Bigfoot
.475 A&M Magnum
ACB for the win.
Fuck John Roberts.
Fuck John Roberts.
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who had been the court’s pivotal member in previous emergency applications seeking relief from virus-related restrictions, dissented along with the court’s three liberal members.
He noted that while the court was considering the petitions, Cuomo, a Democrat, had eased the restrictions, and thus there was no need for the court to intervene now.
“It is a significant matter to override determinations made by public health officials concerning what is necessary for public safety in the midst of a deadly pandemic,” Roberts wrote for himself
He noted that while the court was considering the petitions, Cuomo, a Democrat, had eased the restrictions, and thus there was no need for the court to intervene now.
“It is a significant matter to override determinations made by public health officials concerning what is necessary for public safety in the midst of a deadly pandemic,” Roberts wrote for himself
Mr. terzmo
.308 Win
Shop at the crowed Mall but can't go to Chuch or place of Worship.
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
We’re darned lucky Roberts wasn’t yet gotten to on Heller.
If Trump remains in the WH someone needs to investigate to find what the deep state has on Roberts, and then expose it so he can be impeached.
kev74
20×102mm Vulcan
Just a guess but I have a feeling Robert's name on Epstein's flight logs might be a clue.
Saltwater60
.950 JDJ
My favorite part of the article was the three liberal judge's and John Roberts dissented. They are still pretending he’s conservative? That’s a joke.
kev74
20×102mm Vulcan
It would be funny if Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett all started calling Roberts "Ruth". 
Carlos Hathcock
.450/400 Nitro Ex
"midst of a deadly pandemic". Stop calling it "deadly". People die from shit every day.
technicalgadget
.223 Rem
There’s nothing like breaking the spirit of the people and society by denying people their religion. Classic psychological warfare by the government on their own people. This is beyond fucked up. This is intentional warfare against older people to cause their early demise.
Paxal
.223 Rem
And once again, Roberts goes the other way.
Vapor
.308 Win
"It is time – past time – to make plain that, while the pandemic poses many grave challenges, there is no world in which the Constitution tolerates color-coded executive edicts that reopen liquor stores and bike shops but shutter churches, synagogues, and mosques,"
Justice Roberts is "Compromised" Because He Flew on Epstein's "Lolita Express" Protectors Of Liberty | Protectors of Freedom Protectors of Liberty
President Trump lost his DACA lawsuit…and I’ll give you one guess who threw the ruling and won’t allow President Trump to end the unconstitutional program that Obama started. Yes, you got it – Justice Roberts. The same man who stuck us with OBAMACARE in another wildly inexplicable ruling. MORE...
protectorsofliberty.com
Is this real ?
It's the only way I can think of to remove this puke.
I am also a bit disappointed in Kagan. She has been known to think things through, on occasion.
But Sotomayer and Breyer are hard core Leftists.
wish they’d stop selling Roberts a conservative.
scary that it was another 5-4. covid is a real problem but either the constitution matters or it doesn’t.
Supreme Court blocks strict COVID-19 restrictions on New York houses of worship
It was a reversal from earlier actions taken by the high court in response to state restrictions on organized religion during the pandemic.www.google.com
Who "they" be ?
I can't remember any news platform I follow saying that for at least a decade.
Oh wait - Wikipedia -
Deplorable Me
.700 Nitro Express
I see a number of dummycrats having meltdowns. God bless Amy.
I do not go to church. I do not need a church to honor my gods, no matter what this Governor does or does not do, will not stop me from being whom I wish. I will continue to do all that I do in life. He, his lapdogs nor his edicts will ever stop me from living the way that I want.
This is a good ruling. It is a shame that it was 5-4. Should have been 9-0. This is the path that America is on and has been for a while. I will not hold my breath for the elected elite or the courts to do for me. I have little faith in all of the system.
This should not be a Left/Right issue. This is a pure Constitutional issue.
Here is the First Amendment...
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
The parts in red are all that matters. I do not care the names that voted against this ruling. All I care about is they do not love and respect My Constitution. This should never be about politics. The Courts have failed us again, even though overall, they served justice with this ruling, they still failed the American People.
This is a good ruling. It is a shame that it was 5-4. Should have been 9-0. This is the path that America is on and has been for a while. I will not hold my breath for the elected elite or the courts to do for me. I have little faith in all of the system.
This should not be a Left/Right issue. This is a pure Constitutional issue.
Here is the First Amendment...
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
The parts in red are all that matters. I do not care the names that voted against this ruling. All I care about is they do not love and respect My Constitution. This should never be about politics. The Courts have failed us again, even though overall, they served justice with this ruling, they still failed the American People.
Deplorable Me
.700 Nitro Express
The left has never recognized the Constitution unless it served their selfish agenda.
If you can pinpoint an exact violation of the Constitution, fine. If not, there is no violation. This is the issue, so many want to talk about violations (not you specifically) but have a very hard time pointing to the exact violation.
This is exactly why I am 100% against any attempt to "improve" our Constitution.
The Founders had this right from the very beginning.
The small men who followed them are responsible for the deterioration of this Republic.
kev74
20×102mm Vulcan
He might not be blackmailed. He might just be an asshole.
None of these lockdowns are law! How can .Gov force schools/Businesses to pause? Under what Law?
" Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
So are they just ignoring this bit?
So are they just ignoring this bit?