I’m rolling and I ain’t even dead yet. I’m practicing for when I’m dead and thinks continue to get worse.
The New York-based Second Circuit will soon hear arguments in what is likely to be the most significant Second Amendment court case of the year. Dozens of Second Amendment groups, gun control advocates, and states see it as the first major test of what courts now deem permissible gun regulations.
Five cases out of New York’s federal district courts will be heard in the Second Circuit on March 20 in front of a panel of three judges. The judges face the difficult task of interpreting the state’s gun laws in the wake of a Supreme Court decision from last year.
The confusion around what is and what is not permissible following the Bruen decision will now face its first comprehensive test at the appellate level after five decisions from lower courts struck down key aspects of the CCIA.
The five cases — Antonyuk v. Nigrelli, Hardaway v. Nigrelli, Spencer v. Nigrelli, Christian v. Nigrelli, and Gazzola v. Hochul — resulted in a number of the CCIA’s provisions being thrown out. A requirement that permit applicants demonstrate “good moral character” was thrown out, as was the requirement that applicants submit their social media information as part of background checks.
My thoughts this morning too! Exactly!Monday will be here before we know it.
Sure will be interesting.My thoughts this morning too! Exactly!
The second circuit court is arguably the most liberal in the nation so it’s right and I’m sure you are as well. The only one that’s close is the 9th in California but I think ours is worse.If you look at there website it shows three different judges hearing it and they don’t look like favorable judges. I hope the 2nd circuit page is wrong
They will "hear" the cases. Its going to be a long while before we hear their decision i`m afraid.Might still be Monday according to this article.
Monday a big court day for 2nd amendment, gun laws, gun rights
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Manhattan, will hear five second amendment cases Monday.www.wktv.com
Come on the article said they could rule from the bench??They will "hear" the cases. Its going to be a long while before we hear their decision i`m afraid.
Hope for the best, but be prepared for the worst.
"It's not clear if the judges will rule from the bench, or, reserve decision and issue a written one at a later date. But Sullivan is hopeful for the outcome."Come on the article said they could rule from the bench??
Come on, you KNOW that`s NOT part of the plan/agenda. Stall tactics, stall tactics i tell ya! Kick that can down the road!!!Come on the article said they could rule from the bench??
I agree with @JunkBoxFull. This will drag out for a LOOOONNNNGGG time. Besides, for the judges, the cocktail and dinner circuit is just around the corner ( spring). Why would you ruin the potential if getting invitations to hob nob with the powerful over pesky things like rights?Come on the article said they could rule from the bench??
This was a joke guys.Come on the article said they could rule from the bench??
I think they will toss us a bone on private property. NYS a will then give private property sign the power of law and then they will start enforcing it so again we will be worse off. I think we will get guns in churches and maybe bars, but most of the others will stay banned. They have been warned they have to do something. If they do nothing then it will surely go to the SC.The switch up of judges was deliberate. 2/3 judges are liberal. Clearly the fix is in. I don’t see how we win this. I guess the only recourse is an appeal to SCOTUS. Thomas did warn the second circuit to move expeditiously and told plaintiffs to appeal again if necessary. So we’ll. See. As far as I am concerned, they are not even enforcing the sensitive locations in a meaningful way. We haven’t heard of one arrest. Not even Frey. I think the CCIA will be like the safe act. A tack on charger when some other crime is being committed.
The real hypothetical question would be if that would be considered in line with Bruen and if that compromise would be viewed sufficient by SCOTUS. Being that the SC would most likely not intervene with the lower courts ruling without a hearing to GVR it would "kick the can" again for at least a year, if not more as an emergency stay was already passed up by the SC awhile back, offering guidance to speed up the process rather than intervene. Time will tell, but my money is on 18 months more at minimum.I think they will toss us a bone on private property. NYS a will then give private property sign the power of law and then they will start enforcing it so again we will be worse off. I think we will get guns in churches and maybe bars, but most of the others will stay banned. They have been warned they have to do something. If they do nothing then it will surely go to the SC.
The CCIA goes beyond the safe act and a tack on charge. They completely screwed over anyone wanting a CCWThe switch up of judges was deliberate. 2/3 judges are liberal. Clearly the fix is in. I don’t see how we win this. I guess the only recourse is an appeal to SCOTUS. Thomas did warn the second circuit to move expeditiously and told plaintiffs to appeal again if necessary. So we’ll. See. As far as I am concerned, they are not even enforcing the sensitive locations in a meaningful way. We haven’t heard of one arrest. Not even Frey. I think the CCIA will be like the safe act. A tack on charger when some other crime is being committed.
Yes. The social media stuff, and the training made it more difficult to get. But its the sensitive areas that are the biggest issue. And what I am saying is that being charged for carrying in a sensitive location will be a tack on charge if you are committing another crime or in some sort of dispute.The CCIA goes beyond the safe act and a tack on charge. They completely screwed over anyone wanting a CCW
Haven't heard a thing. If that means the guy wasn't charged, kudos to the area PD and the dude.I'm still trying to find out what happened with the guy in New Hartford, NY that was in Applebees that stopped the crazy knife man... I stopped by the premises and looked at all the doors and windows and I didn't see the green Lawful CCW Allowed notice.
Has that person been charged under the CCIA??
I bet we`ll never hear anymore about it. It doesn`t fit their tyrannical narrative, because he was "protecting" human life.I'm still trying to find out what happened with the guy in New Hartford, NY that was in Applebees that stopped the crazy knife man... I stopped by the premises and looked at all the doors and windows and I didn't see the green Lawful CCW Allowed notice.
Has that person been charged under the CCIA??
That doesn't happen and she doesn't need the data to know she is rightI bet we`ll never hear anymore about it. It doesn`t fit their tyrannical narrative, because he was "protecting" human life.
Talk to any detective and there are plenty of people that have been charged and prosecuted under the safe act. We hear about arrests all the time on the news and in articles posted here.I have not yet seen anyone be charged with an offense under the CCIA yet and am unaware of anyone that has been fully prosecuted under the safe act. Does anyone have any data regarding either?
Do you have any articles or direct citations your aware of you would be willing to post?Talk to any detective and there are plenty of people that have been charged and prosecuted under the safe act. We hear about arrests all the time on the news and in articles posted here.
I know my dad and brother have both made safe act arrests. I know some were tossed out.Do you have any articles or direct citations your aware of you would be willing to post?
Edit- not challenging your position, honest curiosity.