John Stark
.44 mag
I'm going to ask the same question that I asked previously, which you ducked at the time:Going in circles here. The state was not restrained, the governor, superintendent of state police, and specific district attorneys and sheriffs were. The DA in X county is not Governor Hochul or acting on behalf of Governor Hochul. Governor Hochul may be the chief executive but she is not the State of New York nor is she law enforcement; if you think she is then I'd like to see the authority for that argument. Anyway I'm not going to beat that dead horse anymore.
If the chief law enforcement officer of an entire political entity is restrained from enforcing a law that effects an entire political entity, and the law which is the basis for enforcement in that entire political entity flows from the State (regardless who enforces it), then how can it legally (not practically) be enforced and stand in a criminal matter?
Whorechul is not being sued personally, she is being sued in her capacity as the chief law enforcement officer of the State. The law in question is State law, for which she has responsibility to enforce... unless she is restrained to not enforce it. Since she is not being sued personally, but in her official capacity, the State for all intent and purpose is itself restrained from doing so. She IS the State of NY here.
She cannot enforce it anywhere in the State; not in Buffalo, or Rottenchester, in any county, or even NY City (at least in terms of the parts of the CCIA she has been restrained from enforcing.)
If the Governor of a State cannot enforce it, the law us not enforceable.
And any DA who tries to bring a case with this strict and broad TRO is going to have to answer that question right quick in a court of law, especially in a criminal case.
Feel free not to flog the horse, but at a certain point when you make claims, the horse will flog you.
Last edited: