The Surprising Truth About Gun Silencers

[Shadow2]

I agree allot of hair splitting with allot variables tossed in the mix.

Ha ha ha. It is all splitting hairs. It dors not make a 3moa into a 1moa. But it makes a difference way out. Maybe farther then we realize.

But hey, come on down. Bring your rifle and ammo. We'll run it. Tillson ny 12486

 

[FrankenCub]

The Surprising Truth About Gun Silencers

The real surprise is when NY gun owners realize that if this passes we still won't be able to own one in NY
I don't think anything will change until the rest of the country has to feel the pain of NY and Cali gun owners. Until that time, the rest of the country doesn't give a shit.

 

[Eddie Gunks]

The real surprise is when NY gun owners realize that if this passes we still won't be able to own one in NY
I don't think anything will change until the rest of the country has to feel the pain of NY and Cali gun owners. Until that time, the rest of the country doesn't give a shit.

Again. If it is the HPA it will be just like OSHA and EOE. they will have to comply

 

[FrankenCub]

Again. If it is the HPA it will be just like OSHA and EOE. they will have to comply

I'm sure der fuhrer will have some reason to not comply with it and lower courts will favor him just as they have with banning modern sporting rifles. He and cronies will fight SCOTUS using some BS like no one NEEDS to shoot therefore he can claim states rights. I have absolutely zero faith in NY allowing anything that the rest of the country has.

 

[Blimey]

They are illegal for only two reasons: 1) Gov loves to get money it doesn't deserve 2) gun grabbers grab anything related to guns.

There is virtually no downside to them. Gun owners prefer them, gun haters (if not butthurt) would be put off less by the sound of them. And heck, they even make the gun less wieldy and harder to conceal.

 

[Blimey]

I'm sure der fuhrer will have some reason to not comply with it and lower courts will favor him just as they have with banning modern sporting rifles. He and cronies will fight SCOTUS using some BS like no one NEEDS to shoot therefore he can claim states rights. I have absolutely zero faith in NY allowing anything that the rest of the country has.

Or if they comply you can get one but a special NY background system for it and it will take a couple years to setup then a couple years for the background check anyway, so maybe you can have it in a few years.

 

[Eddie Gunks]

I'm sure der fuhrer will have some reason to not comply with it and lower courts will favor him just as they have with banning modern sporting rifles. He and cronies will fight SCOTUS using some BS like no one NEEDS to shoot therefore he can claim states rights. I have absolutely zero faith in NY allowing anything that the rest of the country has.

They could not hold out on desegregating schools. Etc etc. same idea

 

[spat]

I'm sure der fuhrer will have some reason to not comply with it and lower courts will favor him just as they have with banning modern sporting rifles. He and cronies will fight SCOTUS using some BS like no one NEEDS to shoot therefore he can claim states rights. I have absolutely zero faith in NY allowing anything that the rest of the country has.

Obama's DOJ wasn't interested in enforcing those rulings. Hopefully the scrubbing Trump gives the DOJ and Justice department will change that.

 

[FrankenCub]

Glad you guys have faith in the system as it should be. I see hold outs for faith and hope and shit always fills the bucket first. Any rational person will see the benefits of suppressors but we're not talking rational people here in liberal controlled NY.
Really, I'd be happy as hell if I'm wrong but how many truely gun friendly Representatives do we have here, very few. Most that made the claim stabbed us in the back at every turn.