Those who practice Gunism should be arrested

[BerettaGuy]

Alan Corwin has articulated what I have been trying to say for years.
And yes I still think background checks are illegal.

KORWIN: Stop The National Handgun Carry Permit

Gunism defined.
"
Too many gun owners, including some leaders of the gun-rights movement, sincere but totally misinformed and misdirected, are salivating for our permit-carrying president elect to issue some sort of national carry plan. It cannot, must not, better not be a national permit in any way shape or form.

The Best Solution

The best plan to resolve the travesty of national gun-rights denial we Americans have suffered under for generations is repeal of the restrictions that deny your rights. You don’t need no stinkin’ permit to be peacefully in possession of property.

Repeal restrictions on the right to bear arms.

The next logical step would be to arrest and charge officials who under color of law deny a peaceful person’s civil right to possess arms. Denial of rights is a federal felony under 18 USC §241 et seq. You can’t just deny a person’s constitutional, civil and human rights because you don’t like those rights. That’s got a name. It’s gunism. This law 18-241 and the ones that follow it were written to prevent haters from denying people their rights. Everyone has fundamental rights that need equal protection.

Blind hatred of guns is gunism.
"


Read more: KORWIN: Stop The National Handgun Carry Permit

 

[camper4lyfe]

I think that's too large of a chunk to bite off. Do I agree with you? Yes. But it's too big of a chunk to feasibly work. That's why national reciprocity is the main goal.

 

[FN FAL]

Sounds like Cuomo and Schneiderman need a dose of 18 USC §241

 

[eagleridge357]

Gunism...LMAO

 

[Catskillkid]

I take offence to this inappropriate use of the term "gunism." I'll have you know that I am a faithful practitioner of gunism. I pray to the multiple gods of Browning, Colt, Ruger, and Kalashnikov. Drop on my knees 5 time a day and repeat the 27 holy words of the 2nd Amendment. I also go into a meditative trance while mouthing the words "Molon Labe." This is a legitimate religion and attempting to subvert my practice of it is grounds for a lawsuit for violation of my 1st Amendment Rights.

For the record I also self-identify as an ammosexual.

 

[Phauxtoe]

its a Human Rights violation!

(But we all here know this!)

 

[Celt]

I think that's too large of a chunk to bite off. Do I agree with you? Yes. But it's too big of a chunk to feasibly work. That's why national reciprocity is the main goal.

What I don't like right now about the national reciprocity proposals is that they do not take into account states that have constitutional carry already. Take a state like Vermont for example, since they do not have permits does that mean that they cannot legally carry in other states? Also I don't see where it specifically addresses the issue where some states are still may issue. If you have a state that is shall issue bordering on a state that is may issue and a non-resident comes into our state and they can carry, but some of our own residents cannot, that is a problem.

I would rather see National constitutional carry, but I don't know if that will fly. Although it may be worth trying for that anyway.

 

[camper4lyfe]

What I don't like right now about the national reciprocity proposals is that they do not take into account states that have constitutional carry already. Take a state like Vermont for example, since they do not have permits does that mean that they cannot legally carry in other states? Also I don't see where it specifically addresses the issue where some states are still may issue. If you have a state that is shall issue bordering on a state that is may issue and a non-resident comes into our state and they can carry, but some of our own residents cannot, that is a problem.

I would rather see National constitutional carry, but I don't know if that will fly. Although it may be worth trying for that anyway.

It's definitely not cut and dry by any stretch of the imagination. Things have been incrimentalized for so long, it's going to take even longer to get it back, because it has to be incrimentalized back in much smaller steps (like it or not).

 

[Darth]

Agreed.

 

[BerettaGuy]

What I don't like right now about the national reciprocity proposals is that they do not take into account states that have constitutional carry already. Take a state like Vermont for example, since they do not have permits does that mean that they cannot legally carry in other states? Also I don't see where it specifically addresses the issue where some states are still may issue. If you have a state that is shall issue bordering on a state that is may issue and a non-resident comes into our state and they can carry, but some of our own residents cannot, that is a problem.

I would rather see National constitutional carry, but I don't know if that will fly. Although it may be worth trying for that anyway.

Your are right on.

Shall not be infringed except for those that meet certain requirements.
Take a class in which you buy materials from a certain company. Go through a background check that people need for top secret clearance, and oh by the way pay a big fat fee.

Now , remember the GAS Shortage. Jimmy Carter wanted to reduce the speed limit to 55. What he squealed. What do your mean the Federal Government can't dictate to the States. What kind of freakin country is this? Oh, now I remember civics 101. Okay then just tell em if they don't change the speed we will cut off highway funds.

Which is also the same as I can infringed on you if I want to....

Just imagine where we would all be if King George via General Gage had not decided that everyone in the colonies gets to keep their guns except those sombitches in Lexington and Concord. i think today is a good day to infringe the piss out of them.
Pictern! Take some of the boys down to Lexington and Concord and SEIZE all Shot and SHELL. That will show em who is in charge around here.

ps. NY (King Cuomo) will not follow National reciprocity.

 

[Frankly]

I doubt anything will happen at all, the Courts will avoid these cases like the plague and let things fester onward. National reciprocity calls attention to our inconsistent application of states' rights as well as the fact that we don't actually follow the constitution.

The Courts try to avoid ruling on hot topics like abortion, euthanasia, and guns because it's safer politically to maintain the status quo. Mostly that's a good thing as you don't want courts swinging dramatically either way, we have a system that throttles down big change and makes it so it takes a generation or two to really shift opinion (except for gay marriage which was a very well run campaign to push through - even Obama was against gay marriage in 2008, now it's a virtual hate crime to be against it in 2016).

Not resolving it allows all the organizations to go on fund-raising. Plus the gun debate can distract the populace from the larger economic and social shenanigans going on. Granted gun owners outnumber gays but we don't have the media on our side. The pisser is we still have to fight simply to tread water and maintain what we have. The antis know that demographically the country will change enough to be anti-gun within another generation as we die off.

Trump is great but all he really does is buy us a few more years. Unless he does amazing and we're lucky with the economy, wars, etc. so that it becomes clear that conservative ethical capitalism is the one true way.... the pendulum will simply swing back to the Democrats and they'll undo all the positive changes.

 

[holdover]

""For the record I also self-identify as an ammosexual.""

I KNEW IT ! ( not that there's anything wrong with that)

 

[JaguarJaguarGolf]

I think one or more constitutional carry states have an administrative avenue to issue handgun licenses for their citizens who wish to get licenses from other states. I'm pretty sure I read that about Vermont once, and maybe Alaska.

 

[Podmonkey]

That's all fine and good, but while we all dream of how it should be with our heads in the clouds I am denied my basic right of self defence because I must travel through non PA reciprocating states. I gotta drive through cities that are riot prone, through, questionable, shady or outright dangerous commercial and industrial zones and sometimes even have to park overnight in such places. Truckers are some of the most vulnerable targets for criminals out here and I need national reciprocity NOW! National reciprocity is a stop along the way of the end goal of the elimination of all firearms restrictions, not away from it. It can also serve as a wedge against states with restrictve permit policies for resdidents. We need to wake up and stop idealizing, while we demand pie in the sky solutions the anti gunners keep moving the goal posts against us. Anyone that honestly thinks we can get anti gun politicians jailed for anti gun policies is a fool. Small, incrimental steps, just like the antis have taken against us. And anyone that wants to disagree, fine but remember you aren't the one that has to sleep overnight in some dark, isolated warehousing district unarmed, unprotected. There was a female trucker that got caught in the last Charleston riots y'know. They burned her truck down with her trapped inside. Don't want that to happen to me.