At what cost in human lives.This type of CIA inspired freedom uprising succeded in Russia. It destroyed their country and plunged it into multiple civil wars that go on to this day. Many who participated in it now regret it. They are not looked upon kindly. Economic reforms should have been instituted first, political reforms should have followed at slow pace.
China did it the right way and grew to be the second biggest economy.
At what cost in human lives.
So I guess by the same principle the british would be fine shooting the revolutionaries because it would have saved lives.At much lesser cost than what would have followed if Tiananmen Square revolt succeeded.
So I guess by the same principle the british would be fine shooting the revolutionaries because it would have saved lives.
And lenin and stalin could justify their murders by claiming it saved lives.
Here is a prediction: sooner or later the chinese will face a civil war. The cost in lives will be much greater than if the reforms advocated by the tiananmen square protests had succeeded.
Except the first time when we threw the British out. That one worked pretty well.Distabalizing countries doesn't save lives. Every time people rebelled against the government in this country, it was put down by violence, killing and imprisonment.
We know what the formula is, we just don't follow it ourselves as well as we should.We tend to believe, we have the magic formula that all Nations should follow. WE DON'T.
Except the first time when we threw the British out. That one worked pretty well.