Trump's move to cut-off Liberal judges

[Jmac00]

President Trump makes a shrewd move to stop activist judges... - Revolver News

Trump has a plan to shut down activist judges—before they shut down America First.

revolver.news

The odds of Congress getting this done within the necessary timeframe? Pretty much impossible.

So, now what can be done right now?

Well, thankfully, President Trump is working on this behind the scenes. He’s just issued a memorandum that seeks to stop these left-wing judges in their tracks. Under new rules, anyone suing to stop the government’s actions will have to put up a financial bond. If the lawsuit fails, they’ll be on the hook for any costs or damages their legal challenge caused.

This move is meant to hold people accountable for filing weak or politically motivated cases against the federal government.

The Trump administration has issued a new memorandum aimed at combatting those seeking universal injunctions against it to halt its policies.

It is going to demand that per federal rules of civil procedure, those bringing the cases put up injunction bonds.

“it is the policy of the United States to demand that parties seeking injunctions against the Federal Government must cover the costs and damages incurred if the Government is ultimately found to have been wrongfully enjoined or restrained. Federal courts should hold litigants accountable for their misrepresentations and ill-granted injunctions.”

 

[Grimscale]

Where in the Constitution does it say that you must be rich to sue the Federal .gov?

"Injunction bonds"?
Fine. Politicians must put up "corruption bonds" before any bill or EO is entered, in case that bill or EO is deemed un-Constitutional. If the bill or EO is deemed un-Constitutional they forfeit the bond AND get arrested and go to prison.

This is not the direction Trump should be taking.

 

[tirwin1]

Where in the Constitution does it say that you must be rich to sue the Federal .gov?

"Injunction bonds"?
Fine. Politicians must put up "corruption bonds" before any bill or EO is entered, in case that bill or EO is deemed un-Constitutional. If the bill or EO is deemed un-Constitutional they forfeit the bond AND get arrested and go to prison.

This is not the direction Trump should be taking.

You may be correct but something has to be done. This process of lawfare where a well funded ngo or democrat politician goes judge shopping for some minor judge who shuts the entire executive branch down has to stop.

 

[Dr. Evil]

Whatever it takes. Enough already of the liberal scum.

 

[spat]

You may be correct but something has to be done. This process of lawfare where a well funded ngo or democrat politician goes judge shopping for some minor judge who shuts the entire executive branch down has to stop.

The correct answer is for SCOTUS to do their job policing the judiciary.

They are so loathe to punish rogue judges that once in office they can basically rule any way they want and the worst that happens is they get overturned.

When their rulings are blatantly unconstitutional or otherwise overreaching they should be stripped of office, and possibly even referred for prosecution.

 

[JaguarJaguarGolf]

What would Andrew Jackson do?