Jmac00
.475 A&M Magnum
President Trump makes a shrewd move to stop activist judges... - Revolver News
Trump has a plan to shut down activist judges—before they shut down America First.
revolver.news
Trump's move to cut-off Liberal judges
- Thread starter Jmac00
- Start date
Where in the Constitution does it say that you must be rich to sue the Federal .gov?
"Injunction bonds"?
Fine. Politicians must put up "corruption bonds" before any bill or EO is entered, in case that bill or EO is deemed un-Constitutional. If the bill or EO is deemed un-Constitutional they forfeit the bond AND get arrested and go to prison.
This is not the direction Trump should be taking.
"Injunction bonds"?
Fine. Politicians must put up "corruption bonds" before any bill or EO is entered, in case that bill or EO is deemed un-Constitutional. If the bill or EO is deemed un-Constitutional they forfeit the bond AND get arrested and go to prison.
This is not the direction Trump should be taking.
You may be correct but something has to be done. This process of lawfare where a well funded ngo or democrat politician goes judge shopping for some minor judge who shuts the entire executive branch down has to stop.
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
Whatever it takes. Enough already of the liberal scum.
spat
.700 Nitro Express
The correct answer is for SCOTUS to do their job policing the judiciary.
They are so loathe to punish rogue judges that once in office they can basically rule any way they want and the worst that happens is they get overturned.
When their rulings are blatantly unconstitutional or otherwise overreaching they should be stripped of office, and possibly even referred for prosecution.
JaguarJaguarGolf
6.5 Creedmoor
What would Andrew Jackson do?
This is getting ridiculous. A DC district court judge has prevented trump from severing business with the execreble law firm perkins coie. This is the firm that had a direct link to the FBI databases and is knee deep in lawfare against trump. Her reasoning? It's a first amendment violation. You cannot make this stuff up.
When do judges start getting removed and arrested?
Crazy Lawfare - DC District Judge Beryl Howell Now Rules President Trump Cannot Make National Security Decisions on Private Enterprise or Law Firms - The Last Refuge
In more than a few ways this decision is even more crazy than District Judge Beryl Howell’s prior rulings. Judge Howell (pictured below) issued a temporary restraining order, blocking President Trump from barring the law firm of Perkins Coie from representing federal contractors. There are a few...
theconservativetreehouse.com
When do judges start getting removed and arrested?
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
So many times I can just see a picture of the judge to know which way things are going. These liberal women all have the same look.This is getting ridiculous. A DC district court judge has prevented trump from severing business with the execreble law firm perkins coie. This is the firm that had a direct link to the FBI databases and is knee deep in lawfare against trump. Her reasoning? It's a first amendment violation. You cannot make this stuff up.
Crazy Lawfare - DC District Judge Beryl Howell Now Rules President Trump Cannot Make National Security Decisions on Private Enterprise or Law Firms - The Last Refuge
In more than a few ways this decision is even more crazy than District Judge Beryl Howell’s prior rulings. Judge Howell (pictured below) issued a temporary restraining order, blocking President Trump from barring the law firm of Perkins Coie from representing federal contractors. There are a few...theconservativetreehouse.com
When do judges start getting removed and arrested?
Last edited:
OwnTheRide
.223 Rem
They all look like Mitch McConnell, who in turn suffers from "men who look like old lesbians" syndrome.
Robin
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Makes me wonder why we have a President, I mean with all these unelected lower court Judges with seemingly infinite constitutional wisdom it just seems like there is no actual need for one.
In fact, the Supremes should get the fuck off their asses and start dismissing about 99% of these commie assholes.
Robin
In fact, the Supremes should get the fuck off their asses and start dismissing about 99% of these commie assholes.
Robin
More on the story of this renegade judge and his incestuous ties to John Roberts. It seems very clear that Roberts was "gotten to" years ago. His behavior during the trump russiagate fiasco was questionable.
Impeach the prick.
More Background on Judge James Boasberg - The Fight Continues - The Last Refuge
When you understand how Washington DC Judges view their role and responsibility, then you understand the scale of opposition that President Trump is facing. The false media framework of our “government” only makes the issues worse. So, here’s an explanation of Boasberg v Trump. In 2016 the...
theconservativetreehouse.com
Impeach the prick.
Karpteach
6.5 Creedmoor
Most of the Supremes are corrupt just like the Lower judges.
SCROTUM will do nothing. Roberts is a straight-up neo-con traitor (appointed by GW Bush). Barrett was a Manchurian appointment and is a leftist sympathizer - remember the "empty notebook" scam? That was gas-lighting.
There's only 2 strict Constitutoinalists - Alito and Clarence Thomas, and only the latter holds the line.
G-d I miss Scalia, and I bet Thomas does too.
The rest are either Woke or dependably wishy-washy.
ETA: And, yes, I believe Scalia was assassinated.
Koz
6.5 Creedmoor
Most of these judges are personally conflicted by relatives financially benefiting from the matter of which they are ruling. I would have them explain to the Trump admin and the American people why they shouldn't recuse themselves. This was the case with the Biden lawfare cases and since 47 took over. If Roberts wasn't conflicted as well he would step up and put an end to all of it.
Celt
.450/400 Nitro Ex
We need checks and balances, but judges making corrupt, blatantly unconstitutional, or politically motivated decisions need to be held to account.
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
Chief Justice John Roberts’ Link to Rogue Judge Is Revealed - News Addicts
Chief Justice John Roberts is facing renewed scrutiny after his past connection to Chief Judge James E. “Jeb” Boasberg has come under the spotlight. Boasberg, who was appointed to the U.S. District Court by former President Barack Obama in 2011, was later tapped by Roberts in 2014 to serve on...
newsaddicts.com
Robin
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Roberts is a dick, they got something on him, probably the illegal adoption he made. a Bush appointee, self-explanatory.
Robin
Robin
repete
.338 Win Mag
“Jeb” Boasberg has come under the spotlight. Boasberg, who was appointed to the U.S. District Court by former President Barack Obama in 2011, was later tapped by Roberts in 2014 to serve on the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA), which approved surveillance on President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign."
The plot thickens! He should be investigated for signing those fake warrants.
The plot thickens! He should be investigated for signing those fake warrants.
I think they need a lot more than that, and it's spelled H-E-M-P.
Interesting.
The leftist programming is claiming he was appointed by Bush and so must be a Republican who is willing to go against the dictator Trump.
pjzwtl
.308 Win
Honestly Trump should just rewrite the order in question and carry on. Maybe if the higher court sees the threat of the judicial system becoming irrelevant they’ll act. It can’t be any more harmful than letting this broken system carry on.
The Constitution does not provide for ANY District Ct Judges.....................they were created, BY CONGRESS, to handle Fed cases in each SMALL district............not to have a nationwide jurisdiction.
The chickens have come home to roost.
Congress will pass as law restricting District Ct judges to handling cases originating in their local district., not one 2000 miles away................JUDGE SHOPPING, FOR LIB SLIME JUDGES, WILL ESSENTIALLY END.
Cases involving nationwide/Constitutional issues, like the 2nd amendment, or Commerce Clause will be handled by the Fed Appeals Courts, and SCOTUS, as it should be.
The chickens have come home to roost.
Congress will pass as law restricting District Ct judges to handling cases originating in their local district., not one 2000 miles away................JUDGE SHOPPING, FOR LIB SLIME JUDGES, WILL ESSENTIALLY END.
Cases involving nationwide/Constitutional issues, like the 2nd amendment, or Commerce Clause will be handled by the Fed Appeals Courts, and SCOTUS, as it should be.
RedBreast21
.223 Rem
The Judiciary committees controlled by Republicans can bring in these activist judges to testify and be questioned on their rulings. The committee can then move to impeach any judge they find acting in a manner of "bad behavior". That is all it takes. Previously judges have been removed based on "high crimes and misdemeanors" but that was at the discretion of the judiciary committee to use those reasons. These judicial seats, districts and their powers come from Congress. SCOTUS is the only court not in control of Congress and its existence was created by the constitution as a separate branch of govt.
So its time we follow the constitution and remove all bad behaving judges and restrict these districts in scope on what cases can be heard at their level.
So its time we follow the constitution and remove all bad behaving judges and restrict these districts in scope on what cases can be heard at their level.
Last edited:
America has more than 200 district court judges, yet somehow, many of them seem to believe their tiny little gavels give them veto power over the presidency.
And the left is exploiting this judicial free-for-all at every turn. Every time President Trump tries to enforce DOGE, immigration laws, protect election integrity or implement America First policies, some random activist judge pops up and blocks it nationwide. This is not how the system was designed to work—and if it isn’t stopped, it could spiral into a full-blown constitutional crisis.
I am more than fine with the ideas behind all of the Court correction kind of thing. Yep, I am good with it.
These bullshit cases/lawsuits cost the American people, 10's of billions of dollars each year to fight them.
And the left is exploiting this judicial free-for-all at every turn. Every time President Trump tries to enforce DOGE, immigration laws, protect election integrity or implement America First policies, some random activist judge pops up and blocks it nationwide. This is not how the system was designed to work—and if it isn’t stopped, it could spiral into a full-blown constitutional crisis.
I am more than fine with the ideas behind all of the Court correction kind of thing. Yep, I am good with it.
These bullshit cases/lawsuits cost the American people, 10's of billions of dollars each year to fight them.
Please do not wreck this thread with BS lies and made-up nonsense. Please.
Yeah, It's all made up. Do a deep dive sometime. Everything is a Lie! Haven't you been paying attention? My God, Wake up!
Trump should just wetwork these judges. And why the fuck haven't we killed Soros yet?!
Robin
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Looks like the commies have been largely successful in creating a judicial Politburo, aided and abetted by big a crooked media even the ACLU, a communist front organization since its inception, has been legitimized.
We are at war.
Robin
We are at war.
Robin
You're right, and Schmucky Upchuck just said as much. He's admitting to perverting the judiciary, although IMHO they're already mostly perverts and pedos. After all, most are lawyers.
Chuck Schumer Says the Quiet Part Out Loud: 'We Did Put 235 Progressive Judges - on the Bench and They Are Ruling Against Trump Time After Time After Time' | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft