True, besides if they keep their masks on it is easier to identify the target.If anyone here even remotely supports that laughable proposal, that's truly saddening.
If anyone here even remotely supports that laughable proposal, that's truly saddening.
To easy to exploit. If there is a demonstration where everyone is wearing a mask and anyone starts something everyone gets arrested.Question: What do you think is so laughable about it?
"Under the act, anyone "wearing a mask" or in disguise who "injures, oppresses, threatens, or intimidates any person ... in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege" would be subject to a fine or up to 15 years in prison."
Sounds like punishment for people engaging in what is basically terroristic behavior.
How about we just arrest them for the things they do that are already illegal instead ?
Pretty sure "assault" is enough of a charge, we don't need any more.
They won't arrest them for arson, why do we think they'll change their policy if we make a new law that says "arson with a mask is double illegal"....Question: What do you think is so laughable about it?
"Under the act, anyone "wearing a mask" or in disguise who "injures, oppresses, threatens, or intimidates any person ... in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege" would be subject to a fine or up to 15 years in prison."
Sounds like punishment for people engaging in what is basically terroristic behavior.
How about we just arrest them for the things they do that are already illegal instead ?
Pretty sure "assault" is enough of a charge, we don't need any more.
Specifically the word "oppresses".Question: What do you think is so laughable about it?
"Under the act, anyone "wearing a mask" or in disguise who "injures, oppresses, threatens, or intimidates any person ... in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege" would be subject to a fine or up to 15 years in prison."
Sounds like punishment for people engaging in what is basically terroristic behavior.
This exactly.Specifically the word "oppresses".
Wtf does that mean? In today's society it means anything.
Plus the stupidity of the "now it's SUPER ILLEGAL" mindset.
We need far less laws, not more.
Specifically the word "oppresses".
Wtf does that mean? In today's society it means anything.
Plus the stupidity of the "now it's SUPER ILLEGAL" mindset.
We need far less laws, not more.
Adding more shit to the pile won't work.Darth in a vacuum I truly respect your logic, even old school classical Liberals would agree that hate crimes are sinister because they actually criminalize thought.....................my frustration is the lunatic Left can now already invoke a plethora of aggravating factors to nail everyone else.
ANTIFA by their actions, rhetoric, and intentions are a hate group and possibly domestic terrorists.
So yeah it is a race to the bottom if we go tit for tat erasing the Bill of Rights, but if we do not let our balls drop and fight back there will be no Republic, there is no high road when fighting insurrection.
You can still mask up, just don't commit a crime while doing it.
I can't believe there are people here commenting without reading the story first.
What happens if a protest is occurring during the cold weather and someone has a regular scarf on? They going to get arrested and charged with additional crimes?