US RIFLE M1A
.45 acp
Judge issued an order today (Thursday 8/18/22)
I believe what this means is that the judge is granting plaintiff(s) time over the weekend to get in the last word before the first in-person hearing.
Three points: 1) He is walking plaintiffs through exactly what he wants to see in order for him to toss the state's 'lack of standing' arguments, 2) He is doing this without delaying the case in light of the 9/1 deadline, and 3) He is very aware of the problems that would be caused by the CCIA for daily life, especially in the following: Any intent by the plaintiff to engage in conduct... (...carrying a concealed handgun into a gas station or store that is not specifically posted with a sign allowing him to carry there) Showing that the plaintiff plans to engage in this activity also nullifies State's denial of standing.
It also shows me that the judge is aware of every letter, comma and period in everything he has been presented with. Somehow I get a feeling he is taking this to heart.
TEXT ORDER granting Plaintiffs leave to file, along with their reply papers by the end of August 22, 2022, additional or supplemental declarations, including those detailing (1) any hours and resources spent by the organizational Plaintiffs handling communications from aggrieved members and supporters (and/or any anticipated loss of financial support and resulting interference with ability to function as organizations), and (2) any intent by Plaintiff Antonyuk in engage in conduct proscribed by the CCIA (e.g., carrying a concealed handgun into a gas station or store that is not specifically posted with a sign allowing him to carry there), assuming that such declarants are made available for cross-examination at the hearing on August 23, 2022. Additionally, the parties are directed to file any Witness Lists and Exhibit Lists by the end of Monday, August 22, 2022. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 8/18/2022. (sal) (Entered: 08/18/2022)
I believe what this means is that the judge is granting plaintiff(s) time over the weekend to get in the last word before the first in-person hearing.
Three points: 1) He is walking plaintiffs through exactly what he wants to see in order for him to toss the state's 'lack of standing' arguments, 2) He is doing this without delaying the case in light of the 9/1 deadline, and 3) He is very aware of the problems that would be caused by the CCIA for daily life, especially in the following: Any intent by the plaintiff to engage in conduct... (...carrying a concealed handgun into a gas station or store that is not specifically posted with a sign allowing him to carry there) Showing that the plaintiff plans to engage in this activity also nullifies State's denial of standing.
It also shows me that the judge is aware of every letter, comma and period in everything he has been presented with. Somehow I get a feeling he is taking this to heart.
TEXT ORDER granting Plaintiffs leave to file, along with their reply papers by the end of August 22, 2022, additional or supplemental declarations, including those detailing (1) any hours and resources spent by the organizational Plaintiffs handling communications from aggrieved members and supporters (and/or any anticipated loss of financial support and resulting interference with ability to function as organizations), and (2) any intent by Plaintiff Antonyuk in engage in conduct proscribed by the CCIA (e.g., carrying a concealed handgun into a gas station or store that is not specifically posted with a sign allowing him to carry there), assuming that such declarants are made available for cross-examination at the hearing on August 23, 2022. Additionally, the parties are directed to file any Witness Lists and Exhibit Lists by the end of Monday, August 22, 2022. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 8/18/2022. (sal) (Entered: 08/18/2022)
Last edited:
