Dude, do you understand "Top Secret"?Yes I did.
It was at the same meeting I spied on where Marjorie Taylor Green revealed the secret blueprints for the Jewish space lasers.

Dude, do you understand "Top Secret"?Yes I did.
It was at the same meeting I spied on where Marjorie Taylor Green revealed the secret blueprints for the Jewish space lasers.

Did you witness Tucker receiving payments from Russia?
There are only a handful of American pundits that are even willing to give Russia a fair coverage and they are all outside of establishment media.
Surprise, surprise, there are many ethnic Russians and non-Russians in this country who believe that Russia is unfairly targeted by the establishment and its hate mongering media forcing confrontation with Russia. One doesn't have to be bribed by anyone to hold that view.
APIAC on the other hand is an official organization whose role is to bribe American politicians to support Israel. Is there anything even approaching that from the Russian side?
Dude, do you understand "Top Secret"?![]()
NO!!!!!! Don't do it! Stay disconnected. You'll be happier.Now, I need to catch up. I turned all of life off this weekend.
Home now, back to the grind.
NO!!!!!! Don't do it! Stay disconnected. You'll be happier.
I dont think he would either , He likes to play hardball and make empty threats , I think Trump is a terrible statesmenTucker Carlson. lol
I can't take that guy seriously. YMMV.
Trump didn't "actually" say the US is considering using nukes against Iran.
That's just more of Tucker Carlson's clickbait shit right there. IMO.
C'mon man, President Trump isn't going to nuke Iran.
I think ever since he left FOX hes knocking it out of the park . Probably has more views than they do .I used to really, really like Tucker.
Now he is treading water. He needs a new platform, even if it's a Talk Radio Show.
why would that be? he is reporting what trump said .Looks like Carlson has been skipping his meds, again.
why would that be? he is reporting what trump said .
Word for word? No your correct. But nuclear weapons was exactly what was implied, there are no other weapons that could wipe them out in an hour and leave the country desolate so they could never rebuild. what did you think Trump meant?But once again, that's not what Trump said.
Trump NEVER said the US is considering using nukes against Iran.
Just because we're on the next page now, that doesn't change that fact.
Once again, <sigh> it's not at all what Trump actually said.
That's Carlson jumping to his own conclusions. There's a difference.
hey why dont you go read Sauls's articles on the damage inflicted on Isreal? Let me know if you find any.
Word for word? No your correct. But nuclear weapons was exactly what was implied, there are no other weapons that could wipe them out in an hour and leave the country desolate so they could never rebuild. what did you think Trump meant?
hey why dont you go read Sauls's articles on the damage inflicted on Isreal? Let me know if you find any.
Chill im just sayin.Hey, I was just passing on information, adding content to this thread.
You should probably calm down a little. lol
Words have meaning. Speculation is a whole different matter.
So in the end. Trump never actually said that the US is considering using nukes against Iran.
But yet you keep parroting it as he did. This isn't hard.
We need to parachute Lindsey Graham in there to take Iranian rebellion from the FOXNEWS studios into the streets of Teheran.
Years ago I used to like FOXNEWS, now I can only shake my head at the stupidity and ignorance coming from them and people they present as consultants.
Would Lindsey fight for the rebellion, or would he fight for the Ayatollah ?We need to parachute Lindsey Graham in there to take Iranian rebellion from the FOXNEWS studios into the streets of Teheran.
Years ago I used to like FOXNEWS, now I can only shake my head at the stupidity and ignorance coming from them and people they present as consultants.