Yes, one could postulate that an astute person could arrive at the conclusion that it was a gun deal and then I would imagine, by a far stretch, also could conclude that the buyer must have been the person he was attempting to target in the crowd because the deal must have gone bad.His emails that were just released that prove he was selling guns , every property he owned had weapons cashes. His emails described the weapons and bumpfire stocks, and plans to meet a buyer in Las Vegas. The fact that he had 23 weapons in his room and thousands of rounds of Ammo and had been there for days May lead a more astute person to suspect he was making a gun deal .
There's no law that limit anything I'm still scratching my head
What with the recent revelations about how dirty and down right seditious the FBI and DOJ have been and still are, I just don't believe any of the crap we have been fed. They never came clean on 'Fast and Furious' and they will never come clean with this one unless the cancer is rooted out, and even then we may never learn the truth, and you can throw in Sandy Hook as well.
Robin
What with the recent revelations about how dirty and down right seditious the FBI and DOJ have been and still are, I just don't believe any of the crap we have been fed. They never came clean on 'Fast and Furious' and they will never come clean with this one unless the cancer is rooted out, and even then we may never learn the truth, and you can throw in Sandy Hook as well.
Robin