livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
Why It Matters When New York's Governor Spits on SCOTUS's Defense of Religious Freedom
Why It Matters When New York's Governor Spits on SCOTUS's Defense of Religious Freedom - American Thinker
By Jeffrey Folks
During the COVID-19 epidemic, Gov. Cuomo of New York and other governors have tried to shut down or limit attendance at America's churches. Recently, the Supreme Court ruled that Cuomo's COVID response, which limited church attendance to as few as ten or lower, violates the constitutional right to freedom of religion. It may be that the ruling has broad applicability to religious services throughout New York, as well as to those in California and all other states.
Gov. Cuomo's response to the Court's ruling was telling: he dismissed the judicial opinion because the situation on the ground had changed since the case was filed on Oct. 6, and he vowed to continue his restriction of church services at locations other than those mentioned in the Court's ruling. "I think this was really just an opportunity for the court to express its philosophy and politics," Cuomo stated.
Religious liberty is at the heart of our national identity. For a top liberal opinion-maker to say defending it is just "politics" is horrifying.
Sadly, in another display of judicial impotence, Chief Justice John Roberts dissented from the 5-4 ruling. He wrote that since conditions had changed, the Court should avoid addressing "a serious and difficult question." Bizarrely, he justified inaction based on the fact that it is "a significant matter to override determinations made by public health officials." Isn't the Supreme Court designed specifically to decide "serious and difficult" questions? Doesn't the Supreme Court of the United States have the authority to override the determinations of New York state health officials? If it lacks that authority, it has no authority at all.
Why It Matters When New York's Governor Spits on SCOTUS's Defense of Religious Freedom - American Thinker
By Jeffrey Folks
During the COVID-19 epidemic, Gov. Cuomo of New York and other governors have tried to shut down or limit attendance at America's churches. Recently, the Supreme Court ruled that Cuomo's COVID response, which limited church attendance to as few as ten or lower, violates the constitutional right to freedom of religion. It may be that the ruling has broad applicability to religious services throughout New York, as well as to those in California and all other states.
Gov. Cuomo's response to the Court's ruling was telling: he dismissed the judicial opinion because the situation on the ground had changed since the case was filed on Oct. 6, and he vowed to continue his restriction of church services at locations other than those mentioned in the Court's ruling. "I think this was really just an opportunity for the court to express its philosophy and politics," Cuomo stated.
Religious liberty is at the heart of our national identity. For a top liberal opinion-maker to say defending it is just "politics" is horrifying.
Sadly, in another display of judicial impotence, Chief Justice John Roberts dissented from the 5-4 ruling. He wrote that since conditions had changed, the Court should avoid addressing "a serious and difficult question." Bizarrely, he justified inaction based on the fact that it is "a significant matter to override determinations made by public health officials." Isn't the Supreme Court designed specifically to decide "serious and difficult" questions? Doesn't the Supreme Court of the United States have the authority to override the determinations of New York state health officials? If it lacks that authority, it has no authority at all.
Why It Matters When New York's Governor Spits on SCOTUS's Defense of Religious Freedom
During the COVID-19 epidemic, Gov. Cuomo of New York and other governors have tried to shut down or limit attendance at America's churches. Recently, the Supreme Court ruled that Cuomo's COVID response, which limited church attendance to as f...
www.americanthinker.com