KYLE'S LAW: Stopping Politically Motivated Prosecutions of Self-Defense
- Thread starter livingston
- Start date
Yeah... Unfortunately I can see this as an end-around to the coming SCOTUS upholding scrutiny (strict) in regard to the NY 2A case...
Simply harden the use of force laws to remove any ability using a firearm for justifiable defense!
Think about it... You're attacked in your home, and they would want you to first call the police (they're busy defunding) and then only after asking the attacker nicely to stop would you be allowed to attempt to go to your firearm safe, unlock it, retrieve your key for the trigger lock, load a magazine and rack the slide, this so you may fire a warning shot prior to aiming at the attacker...
No acceptable use of a firearm in public for the purpose of defense. You will be legally required to submit to an attacker and will be charged if you deny the attacker from taking what they want and causing a problem. You become the criminal when you resist by fighting back, how dare you deny to liberation of your valuables to those less fortunate?
Lmao...
Simply harden the use of force laws to remove any ability using a firearm for justifiable defense!
Think about it... You're attacked in your home, and they would want you to first call the police (they're busy defunding) and then only after asking the attacker nicely to stop would you be allowed to attempt to go to your firearm safe, unlock it, retrieve your key for the trigger lock, load a magazine and rack the slide, this so you may fire a warning shot prior to aiming at the attacker...
No acceptable use of a firearm in public for the purpose of defense. You will be legally required to submit to an attacker and will be charged if you deny the attacker from taking what they want and causing a problem. You become the criminal when you resist by fighting back, how dare you deny to liberation of your valuables to those less fortunate?
Lmao...
libertysnake
.338 Win Mag
lol no. I'm not playing games in terms of my life. If my life is going to be potentially over cause someone is in my home, prepared to do harm to me and my wife, I'm blasting. They want to lock me up unjustly, that's on them for being cowards in office. There is more honor in defending your life and family, than doing time in a cell for just that fact (assuming such a miscarriage of justice is even possible.)
I will not let harm come to me or my wife in my home, period.
Last edited:
Acer-m14
.950 JDJ
all gun laws are null n void .. the missing bicep man proves it .. ..
but skateboards and ball bats are a okay ..
but skateboards and ball bats are a okay ..
Acer-m14
.950 JDJ
if you cant defend yourself .. then all personal armed security you hired to protect you with guns is null n void too ..
I mean can you imagine the SCOTUS doesn't wait till next year to bitch slap NY?
Oh my... I'm not sure the progressives could handle it! What will they ever do of "shall issue" is determined to be Unconstitutional!?!?
But yeah, there's a fine line on Malicious Prosecution and what was done here... A very fine line. I hope the kid has enough time to sit and make a list of lawsuits!
PS, he should stay off the damned TV circuit for heaven's sake! None of that is to his benefit...
Oh my... I'm not sure the progressives could handle it! What will they ever do of "shall issue" is determined to be Unconstitutional!?!?
But yeah, there's a fine line on Malicious Prosecution and what was done here... A very fine line. I hope the kid has enough time to sit and make a list of lawsuits!
PS, he should stay off the damned TV circuit for heaven's sake! None of that is to his benefit...
Acer-m14
.950 JDJ
i hear he will be on Tuckers show Monday ..
i don't like this .. .. Kyle needs a year vacation at least ..
fking media hounds ..
spat
.700 Nitro Express
Well... It is a hard road, but "IF" it can be demonstrated that the Prosecutor ignored facts that had shown no law was broken, as the case would lend to, and prosecuted the kid regardless due to political reasons or pressure... A Malicious Prosecution case could be warranted. But as we've seen, these fuckers don't eat their own! Even despite the Judge multiple admonishments of the Prosecutorial malfeasance, it wouldn't go anywhere!
But hey... Look at our new Governor, who if you just arrived from space, would read her words and make an assumption that this kid just showed up somewhere and shot people without cause, or just because he had a firearm! Much work to do? Yes, and that is remove the koolaid from the general population!
But hey... Look at our new Governor, who if you just arrived from space, would read her words and make an assumption that this kid just showed up somewhere and shot people without cause, or just because he had a firearm! Much work to do? Yes, and that is remove the koolaid from the general population!
spat
.700 Nitro Express
How about all the violations of evidentiary law ?
I think creating a low resolution video to turn over to the defense in place of the high resolution one in his possession should be enough alone.
He can try to argue his 'aww shucks, I'm just incompetent" defense if he wants. And if successful, then nobody should ever hire him for anything more complex than bagging groceries.
Acer-m14
.950 JDJ
seen a post on FB .. Kyle is suing the view .. 60 mil ..
Seeing something on facebook is generally a good reason not to believe it.
No, the Rittenhouses Haven't Sued Joy Behar, Whoopi Goldberg for Defamation
It's always prudent to check the source of a claim before sharing online "news."
www.snopes.com
Deplorable Me
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Snopes has become bias and unreliable.Seeing something on facebook is generally a good reason not to believe it.
No, the Rittenhouses Haven't Sued Joy Behar, Whoopi Goldberg for Defamation
It's always prudent to check the source of a claim before sharing online "news."
Facebook is full of crap and the fact check source are becoming politically motivated with Snopes in the lead.
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
Snopes has been from say one
Jsmegs77
.308 Win
For me, the fact that Snopes is saying the opposite tends to make me think it’s true. But if it were true, why would it be public information this early in the game? Or do civil cases involving defamation move that quickly?