Mass Formation Psychosis hits the Supreme Court

[BerettaGuy]

Now all three of the coequal branches of Government are hit with mass formation psychosis.
They are supposed to rule on the facts of the case and not on the mass formation psychosis they have we have been subject to.
The fear of dying from COVID and the fear that everyone is going to die from COVID is the result of mass formation psychosis.
The belief that only Dr. Fauchi and the Government can save us from COVID is the result of mass formation psychosis.
Wearing a mask while driving alone or while walking your dog in East Aurora NY is a result of mass formation psychosis.
Hell, wearing a mask period is a result of mass formation psychosis.
Now several Justices of the Supreme Court are convinced of all of the above so they are suffering from mass formation psychosis.
I was hoping for some salvation from them, but it is not looking good.
Can you imagine the headlines from the gaslighters of mass formation psychosis if they rule that the POTUS does not have authority to make laws or rule over individuals? I can see it now. SCOTUS condemns millions to death. or, The SCOTUS has blood on their robes.
Or, Thanks to the Conservative on the Court, YOU ARE GOING TO DIE!
What a bummer.

 

[tirwin1]

They must all watch CNN and msnbc. We are doomed.

 

[BerettaGuy]

LIke I said! Mass formation psychosis.

Justice Sotomayor Exaggerated the Number of Severe COVID-19 Cases Among Children

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments Friday on whether to prevent the Biden administration's vaccine mandate for private workplaces from…

reason.com

 

[prambo]

LIke I said! Mass formation psychosis.

Justice Sotomayor Exaggerated the Number of Severe COVID-19 Cases Among Children

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments Friday on whether to prevent the Biden administration's vaccine mandate for private workplaces from…

reason.com

If a female, Maoist SCROTUM "justice" says anything, it's not exaggerated, it's a purposeful lie.

In fact, if it comes out of the mouths of Breyer, Kagan, Sotomayor, Barrett, Kavanaugh or Roberts it's a lie.

Start doing s mental "tally sheet" of people obviously in the grip of "Mass Formation Psychosis" (AKA Nazism) - the majority by far are female.

And yes I'm slagging fUSA womenz - they wanted "equality" with men, and look what they do - screeching, mentally unstable, dictatorial, hysterical cunts.

And don't give me any of that "maternal instinct" bullshit - these are SS without cojones.

The only positive side of this is that no one has to search too far for the next 5 years or so for a winner of the "Roland Freisler Lifetime Achievement Award". The winners for the next 5-7 years are all present members of SCROTUM.

 

[ManualF150]

I'm not against women being in office or holding high powers. Just like men of the same stature, they need to be chosen wisely.

However, look back in history - men have always been leaders and men protect the women and children, while bringing poker faced stability.

Yes, I know there are exceptions to that, but for the most part, historically speaking women have always been viewed as weak territory politically.

 

[Blimey]

I'm not against women being in office or holding high powers. Just like men of the same stature, they need to be chosen wisely.

However, look back in history - men have always been leaders and men protect the women and children, while bringing poker faced stability.

Yes, I know there are exceptions to that, but for the most part, historically speaking women have always been viewed as weak territory politically.

Men have generally ruled, but there are enough notable exceptions that I am not convinced they are inherently better at it. I’ve seen enough women in business act with consistent competency that I just don’t see a big gender gap here. I do think men and women are biologically biased toward certain professions, so I am not promoting a genders-are-always-equal idea.

As for SCOTUS and covid nobody should be surprised if scotus okays Biden on this. Although the mechanism is wrong imo scotus has already established the fact that states can mandate vaccines (settled over a century ago), so can the federal gov? My guess is yes, as they have been doing so for a long time in other ways.

 

[prambo]

Get the Courts Out of Science ⋆ Brownstone Institute

"What absolutely cannot happen in any free, civilized, and stable country is to have such fundamental questions of liberty and bodily autonomy adjudicated by a panel of lawyers who have limited curiosity in the science, a lack of knowledge of facts on the ground that are available to anyone who cares, and who get their basic facts about a pandemic from TV talk shows and a prevailing media ethos that has no basis in reality."

"The very existence of this case in the Supreme Court reveals that something is fundamentally broken about our presumptions about the relationship between the individual and the state. It must be fixed."

My only disagreement with him is that he thinks it will be a 6-3 decision against the mandates.

I hope he's right, but I doubt it.

 

[Bigfoot]

The vaccine(s) don't work, the vaccinated people can and will spread the virus just the same as the unvaccinated people. I do not believe for one second that the leftist Supreme Court Justices do not know that proven fact, and understand that proven fact. It's not a secret. It's not rocket science.
They most definitely know the truth of the matter.

By repeating CNN Fake News Media lies. They are just being shameless leftist activist judges that have no honor or character. They are doing what activist judges do. And this Country is in trouble.

 

[Bigfoot]

IMHO I think that they know the true facts of the case. Sotomayor knows she is repeating lies.
How could she not? They're just not doing their job as intended...

The leftist judges including Roberts will betray the American people once again.

 

[Deplorable Me]

Meanwhile no charges are being pursued against Cuomo for dumping infected geriatric seniors into nursing homes.

 

[GOYABEAN]

psychosis

 

[livingston]

National File - Fearless Independent Journalism

National File delivers fearless, independent journalism. No corporate agenda. Just the truth. Breaking news, politics, culture, and more.

nationalfile.com

The Supreme Court’s oral arguments over Biden’s OSHA vaccine mandate on Friday were rife with lies and disinformation about the coronavirus and vaccines.​

 

[holdover]

Would you expect anything different? This is global. Once these vax mandates are accepted and required, it will be used as legal precedence for further intrusions into our lives. The end goal isnt just that everyone is vaccinated, thats the start point.

 

[Truebeliever]

The federal mandate is going to get tossed by the court if not for one simple reason, it didn’t go through Congress.

 

[MothMan]

Sotomayor sounded like that red head bitch from the View.

 

[dwa12479]

I can't decide which is more frightening. The prospect that these judges are truly this misinformed, or that they're just straight up fucking lying.

 

[spat]

Men have generally ruled, but there are enough notable exceptions that I am not convinced they are inherently better at it. I’ve seen enough women in business act with consistent competency that I just don’t see a big gender gap here. I do think men and women are biologically biased toward certain professions, so I am not promoting a genders-are-always-equal idea.

As for SCOTUS and covid nobody should be surprised if scotus okays Biden on this. Although the mechanism is wrong imo scotus has already established the fact that states can mandate vaccines (settled over a century ago), so can the federal gov? My guess is yes, as they have been doing so for a long time in other ways.

There are certainly women who are qualified and make exceptional leaders.

But while the general population is split roughly 50/50 between men and women, the population of people with the qualities necessary for those roles are more like 90/10.

And that means that the number of good male leaders is much larger than the number of female ones.

Therefore statically the best male leaders will be better than the best female ones.

Just like that is the case with athletes in the vast majority of sports. Sure, there are exceptional female swimmers, and tennis players, etc... But, the top tier cannot compete with the top tier of men.

It's not just athletic ability that this is evident in. The same population dynamic is present in chess masters for instance.

That is a highly objective measure, there are about 1300 chess grandmasters in the world. 39 of them are female.

 

[tirwin1]

There are certainly women who are qualified and make exceptional leaders.

But while the general population is split roughly 50/50 between men and women, the population of people with the qualities necessary for those roles are more like 90/10.

And that means that the number of good male leaders is much larger than the number of female ones.

Therefore statically the best male leaders will be better than the best female ones.

Just like that is the case with athletes in the vast majority of sports. Sure, there are exceptional female swimmers, and tennis players, etc... But, the top tier cannot compete with the top tier of men.

It's not just athletic ability that this is evident in. The same population dynamic is present in chess masters for instance.

That is a highly objective measure, there are about 1300 chess grandmasters in the world. 39 of them are female.

Get outta here with this stuff. Next your gonna tell us there are only two genders.

/Sarcasm

 

[Acer-m14]

they need to check there feelings at the door and rule on law ... like the 4th .. "The right of the people to be secure in their persons"

where are the rules/laws for having to eat healthy .. exercising .. ect ..

 

[Vapor]

Humanity is full of selfish predators, regardless of gender.

Very few people are fit to lead.


Only those who can throw off their primordial primate programing and accept logical mortality are fit to lead.


The primate brain can be full of empathy, concern, care for your fellow man.


It can also be prone to fear, aggression, and selfish behavior.

 

[tirwin1]

The phrase must have hit a nerve because the media are telling us there is no such thing. I think their fear is showing.

You Know the Global Elites are Triggered When the Propaganda Institutions Collaborate to Refute "Mass Formation Psychosis" - The Last Refuge

Yes Alice, the same “experts” and media who are credibly accused of creating/enabling the mass formation psychosis would like to assure us that no such reality exists

theconservativetreehouse.com

 

[livingston]

The phrase must have hit a nerve because the media are telling us there is no such thing. I think their fear is showing.

You Know the Global Elites are Triggered When the Propaganda Institutions Collaborate to Refute "Mass Formation Psychosis" - The Last Refuge

Yes Alice, the same “experts” and media who are credibly accused of creating/enabling the mass formation psychosis would like to assure us that no such reality exists

theconservativetreehouse.com

 

[Bigfoot]

For good reason I don't believe anything coming out of 95% of the media.

The AP (Associated Press.) The reality is, AP (All Propaganda.)

 

[Bigfoot]

I'm not saying that Mass Formation Psychosis isn't a thing.

IMO I just find it hard to believe that some of the Supreme Court Justices don't know all of the facts of this case. The true facts. One being that Omicron isn't as deadly as Delta for an example. They are repeating lies and supporting the misinformation to advance the agenda.

3 or 4 of them are nothing more than POS activist judges. A couple more do not have the balls to do the right thing.

I am hoping for the best, but I will be surprised if the SCOTUS rules against Biden's Unconstitutional Executive Order. And that will not be do to Mass Formation Psychosis. It will be to do with corruption of the highest order.

3 or 4 of them... The leftists... THEY. KNOW. THE. TRUE. FACTS... They're not that fucking stupid.

 

[tirwin1]

I'm not saying that Mass Formation Psychosis isn't a thing.

IMO I just find it hard to believe that some of the Supreme Court Justices don't know all of the facts of this case. The true facts. One being that Omicron isn't as deadly as Delta for an example. They are repeating lies and supporting the misinformation to advance the agenda.

3 or 4 of them are nothing more than POS activist judges. A couple more do not have the balls to do the right thing.

I am hoping for the best, but I will be surprised if the SCOTUS rules against Biden's Unconstitutional Executive Order. And that will not be do to Mass Formation Psychosis. It will be to do with corruption of the highest order.

3 or 4 of them... The leftists... THEY. KNOW. THE. TRUE. FACTS... They're not that fucking stupid.

Do they know the facts? Or do they live in a liberal bubble where they get their information from a small number of "reliable" sources like the ny times and cnn? I think Sotomayor is truly ignorant.

 

[Bigfoot]

Do they know the facts? Or do they live in a liberal bubble where they get their information from a small number of "reliable" sources like the ny times and cnn? I think Sotomayor is truly ignorant.

You could be right. But myself I find it hard to believe that a judge doesn't know the facts of the case before him/her. Just saying. I think that they are just playing dumb as to support their upcoming decision. Maybe I give judges to much credit IDK. Maybe some of them such as Sotomayor are truly that ignorant.

Either way, the error of their ways should have been pointed out to them by now by the other judges and assorted staff members. I mean Sotomayor and Breyer's were not even close to the true facts of the case. If they keep repeating those wild lies/misinformation I will be pretty sure at that point that they are just advancing the agenda. But until then, you do make a good point to consider though.

 

[tirwin1]

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

 

[BerettaGuy]

I'm not against women being in office or holding high powers. Just like men of the same stature, they need to be chosen wisely.

However, look back in history - men have always been leaders and men protect the women and children, while bringing poker faced stability.

Yes, I know there are exceptions to that, but for the most part, historically speaking women have always been viewed as weak territory politically.

Like it or not! The world was built by men. Today, however, the lines are blurred. Men think that have to be like women and women pretend to be tough like a thug thinking that that is how men act.
When the river rises who do you want carrying granny out of the house to safety. A woman or the other. I know what I am saying is totally against the tolerant left political correct version of what is allowed. But, what we have done is create a bunch of women that think they don't need men. Good luck with that.
LUG Lesbian until Graduation and LAD Lesbian after Divorce.
I define a woman as a woman and men are men. Every other option is an anomaly.

 

[Grimscale]

When the river rises who do you want carrying granny out of the house to safety. A woman or the other.

If the woman is trained and worked her ass off for the job, hell yeah she'd be fine to pull granny from the river.

But if the job is handed to her because she has tits... yeah, not so much.


But the same applies to men. If they learned their job it's great. If they got it because of dangly bits between their legs then expect grand-ma to drown.

 

[BerettaGuy]

Men have generally ruled, but there are enough notable exceptions that I am not convinced they are inherently better at it. I’ve seen enough women in business act with consistent competency that I just don’t see a big gender gap here. I do think men and women are biologically biased toward certain professions, so I am not promoting a genders-are-always-equal idea.

As for SCOTUS and covid nobody should be surprised if scotus okays Biden on this. Although the mechanism is wrong imo scotus has already established the fact that states can mandate vaccines (settled over a century ago), so can the federal gov? My guess is yes, as they have been doing so for a long time in other ways.

If the Fed can mandate an individual, then why can't they "mandate" that you drive 55?