Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
State zoning would destroy New York suburbs
A guest column from Nassau County Legislator in opposition to Gov. Kathy Hochul's zoning provision.
www.liherald.com
State zoning would destroy New York suburbs
- Thread starter Dr. Evil
- Start date
GOYABEAN
.950 JDJ
They're trying to spreadState zoning would destroy New York suburbs
A guest column from Nassau County Legislator in opposition to Gov. Kathy Hochul's zoning provision.www.liherald.com
throughout NY
S&W Fan
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Prima Nocta , if we can’t get them out , we’ll breed them out.
Filthy , Nasty radical liberal cucks.
Filthy , Nasty radical liberal cucks.
Last edited:
Saltwater60
.950 JDJ
They are trying to do this on a federal level so they can import inner city trash into our neighborhoods and make high rises in suburbs to make it cheaper.
Phazer
.338 Win Mag
Remember when Astorino opposed this in Westchester under Obama? The Liberal Progressives shouted, "Astorino is against affordable housing!"
Bigfoot
.450/400 Nitro Ex
It's best for everybody for inner city trash to stay in the inner city.
Ho Lee Fuk NY Sucks and FUKH is determined to crank up the suck factor.
Ho Lee Fuk NY Sucks and FUKH is determined to crank up the suck factor.
Report: Democrats Flee from Associating with Democrat Party, 'Brand Is so Toxic'
Democrats across the nation are embarrassed about the perception of the Democrat Party's growing toxicity.
www.breitbart.com
OwnTheRide
.44 mag
This is a weird one. Think about it for a second: the state is trying to reduce the amount of regulation and everyone here is in opposition.
What is being said in this thread is "NO! I want my local government to be able to limit what I can build on my property!"
Though that's not quite the case. I don't think anyone here wants to be limited on what they can build on their property. We just want our neighbors to be limited on what they can build on theirs.
...which sounds awfully liberal...
What is being said in this thread is "NO! I want my local government to be able to limit what I can build on my property!"
Though that's not quite the case. I don't think anyone here wants to be limited on what they can build on their property. We just want our neighbors to be limited on what they can build on theirs.
...which sounds awfully liberal...
Bozo
.45 acp
This is a weird one. Think about it for a second: the state is trying to reduce the amount of regulation and everyone here is in opposition.
What is being said in this thread is "NO! I want my local government to be able to limit what I can build on my property!"
Though that's not quite the case. I don't think anyone here wants to be limited on what they can build on their property. We just want our neighbors to be limited on what they can build on theirs.
...which sounds awfully liberal...
Swing and a miss. Nice try, though. Decision-making at the lowest level of government (aka local-control) is a decidedly Conservative principle, and was one of the foundations of the original movement. Citizens have no greater chance at truly representative government than at the local level. Statists always seek to remove that local control as they attempt to consolidate ever more power.
Jmac00
.475 A&M Magnum
they're pretending to be Republican, so they can get re-elected. and continue fucking up the countryReport: Democrats Flee from Associating with Democrat Party, 'Brand Is so Toxic'
Democrats across the nation are embarrassed about the perception of the Democrat Party's growing toxicity.
MothMan
.338 Win Mag
I’m was hopin for 500k more people leaving NY this year maybe this will get it up to 750k!! Roll Tide, Roll! 
OwnTheRide
.44 mag
Nothing is that absolute. We long ago learned that there needs to be some level of non-local control - that's why the Articles of Confederation didn't work out.
For a very relevant example, we enjoy state-level preemption when it comes to gun laws. That's what prevents localities from creating laws and regulations that would, say, prohibit you from carrying in a neighboring county. This is the same exact concept, applied to zoning.
Are you similarly opposed to state preemption for our gun laws as well?
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
State zoning would destroy New York suburbs :
More likely it would destroy conservative voteing base'es most likely being filled with aliens and financed by US banks
Now small town NY can enjoy the culture of thousands of Conogeese or Salvadorians into an area with no industry and few jobs Perhaps a few thousand Muslims from Afganistan would enrich the lives of People in Orchard park NY
Truebeliever
6.5 Creedmoor
Think about it. You buy a house in a single family house area. Now the state changes it. The developers are going to make flop houses around you. Overnight the neighborhood changes.This is a weird one. Think about it for a second: the state is trying to reduce the amount of regulation and everyone here is in opposition.
What is being said in this thread is "NO! I want my local government to be able to limit what I can build on my property!"
Though that's not quite the case. I don't think anyone here wants to be limited on what they can build on their property. We just want our neighbors to be limited on what they can build on theirs.
...which sounds awfully liberal...
Remember how investment banking firms like Blackrock were buying up single family homes increasing the prices of starter homes? Could that be a reason for this big push by the state?
THIS IS ALL ABOUT AGENDA 21 AND 2030.
I HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT THESE TWO PROGRAMS FOR YEARS.
EVERYTHING THAT IS HAPPENING CAN BE FOUND ON THE UN's WEBSITE.
THIS IS NOT A NEW THING, HAPPENING IN MANY OTHER PLACES AROUND THE US. HAS BEEN FOR YEARS.
Yes, I am yelling.
I HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT THESE TWO PROGRAMS FOR YEARS.
EVERYTHING THAT IS HAPPENING CAN BE FOUND ON THE UN's WEBSITE.
THIS IS NOT A NEW THING, HAPPENING IN MANY OTHER PLACES AROUND THE US. HAS BEEN FOR YEARS.
Yes, I am yelling.
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
Why'd you stop yelling? People are obviously deaf as well as dumb and blind.
Six years ago......
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
Fuck the UN. Why do humans think they have to have all of the answers? Humans think they're all that. Sorry, I am not trying to save the world. I also realize that no matter how you slice it some people will have it harder than others. Again, I am not trying to save the world. I also don't go out of my way to screw it up either. I take care of myself, my wife and my kids until they can take care of themselves. Call me selfish if you must. I don't care. Dress it up how ever you must. It still winds up as socialism. Now I can't live the way I want and have worked for because someone else doesn't have the same ability? To hell with that. Not that I want to die but I am also up for not being here forever the way the world is going. "They" cause problems and then have insane solutions for the problems "they" cause. My sympathy/empathy tank is running on fumes.
Last edited:
JaguarJaguarGolf
6.5 Creedmoor
So kind of like your upstate license not honored in NYC
Building One America strategic partner John Powell had this to say about racism and the suburbs:
“In creating the suburbs it was explicit that the suburbs were for whites only. You had demands for civil rights, and you had the federal government essentially paying white people to leave the central city and to live in this new space – a white space – called the suburbs. The structure of that is still what we’re living with today. So much of the work of Jim Crow laws was maintaining social distance between blacks and whites. Now whites lived in the suburbs, and blacks and racialized others lived in the city. Social differences became redefined through these fragmented, racialized, metropolitan areas. Money was divested from the city, which were old neighborhoods where black were more likely to live, and suburbs were created”.
“In creating the suburbs it was explicit that the suburbs were for whites only. You had demands for civil rights, and you had the federal government essentially paying white people to leave the central city and to live in this new space – a white space – called the suburbs. The structure of that is still what we’re living with today. So much of the work of Jim Crow laws was maintaining social distance between blacks and whites. Now whites lived in the suburbs, and blacks and racialized others lived in the city. Social differences became redefined through these fragmented, racialized, metropolitan areas. Money was divested from the city, which were old neighborhoods where black were more likely to live, and suburbs were created”.
Obama Using Agenda 21 “Regionalism” to Covertly Destroy America’s Suburbs | SFPPR
Selous Foundation is a conservative Washington DC-based think tank founded in 1985 during the height of the Reagan revolution, whose mission is to formulate and promote public policies based on the American values and benefits derived from the Founding Fathers, including limited government...
sfppr.org
I can keep posting, real and important information on this if some are interested. If not, I will stop.
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
I live in the suburbs. There are black families in the suburbs where I live. There are black families that have nicer houses than I do. There are black families that drive nicer cars than I do. Stop with the fucking excuses already. Stop being parasites no matter what skin color you have. Take personal responsibility for your actions. If you have kids do the right thing and raise them properly. Spend time with them. Teach them right from wrong. Work hard. Be kind to all people. Stop being a victim. I mean seriously, is it really that fucking difficult to understand?
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
Remember what has transpired in Australia and Canada over the last few years and currently. These liberal progressive guest dolts are from Australia and Canada. Enough said. Oh yeah, this is what the liberal educational system results in.
pjzwtl
.308 Win
Interesting take but reading the article it appears to be more of a mandate on what to build rather than a step towards more freedom.This is a weird one. Think about it for a second: the state is trying to reduce the amount of regulation and everyone here is in opposition.
What is being said in this thread is "NO! I want my local government to be able to limit what I can build on my property!"
Though that's not quite the case. I don't think anyone here wants to be limited on what they can build on their property. We just want our neighbors to be limited on what they can build on theirs.
...which sounds awfully liberal...
Faulty logic. Not a valid comparison.