Phazer
.338 Win Mag
That'll be fun: Lower court can find future cases moot because they were already addressed by NYSRPA vs Bruen....which is a decision that New York's government is ignoring. So....nothing will change.
Last edited:
Temporary Restaining Order Issued For Concealed Carry Improvement Act (merged thread)
- Thread starter Glock_USA
- Start date
Trying to keep up with this thread and if I am a felon or lawful citizen changing daily
Truebeliever
6.5 Creedmoor
So, he wasn’t charged or got a ticket. They brought him back to the stationhouse ( barracks) while they figured things out.
fnfalguy
.308 Win
And here we go again. Injunction on private property I believe.
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
kev74
20×102mm Vulcan
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
Cue the 2nd circuit in 3... 2... 1... Guarantee bitch Letitia is already penning a letter or on the phone.
Saltwater60
.950 JDJ
At least we have a few going on so now maybe we can get rolling injunctions so we’re covered at all times even when o e or two are stayed by the second circuit.
maverick52
.223 Rem
This is how we win. Case after case in our favor. The Second Circuit is getting cornered.
Steal2B
.700 Nitro Express
Steal2B
.700 Nitro Express
Well, those with timid souls then need not apply!
I'm not worried about it at all, fuck it! It happens then it happens. Truthfully the only time I even think about this bullshit is when I come here and read a thread about it. Otherwise I exercise my RIGHTS daily, as many of them possible! But most importantly the Right to live FREELY, and to pursue my HAPPINESS, not that which the Govt defines or regulates for me by permission... I don't think about it, I just do whatever the fuck it is I want to do. I'm not boasting bravado bullshit, go run around rub it in people's face kinda shit. Just go about your business, and enjoy life. Stop worrying about the Big Bad Wolf that never comes!
And oh, get the fuck our of NY as fast as you can!
Lol...
I should be out sometime next year! But not soon enough!!!
Fuck NY
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
BREAKING NEWS: NY Anti-2A Law Ruled UNCONSTITUTIONAL For 4th Time!!
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
ManualF150
.308 Win
So does this mean that folks are now allowed to carry on private property again?
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
Acer-m14
.950 JDJ
maybe
no
yes
maybe
only if your a felon can you carry without a permit ..
LOL
no
yes
maybe
only if your a felon can you carry without a permit ..
LOL
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
perhaps
Saltwater60
.950 JDJ
That’s mean to jabba and defamation of jabbas character.
FrankenCub
.338 Win Mag
I guess I really dont give a shit any more. I don't see things really changing for our favor for quite a while, if at all. I'm sure they're going to keep the training requirement so that's a $500 I'll put towards leaving this hell hole. Will definitely be leaving this state. Just don't know how soon, but not soon enough.
Acer-m14
.950 JDJ
just passed my ccia de escalation training .. gave the the cat a catnip toy and the dog thought it was his toy too ..
16 hours later i finally got the cat off the dogs leg
no shots were fired
16 hours later i finally got the cat off the dogs leg
no shots were fired
Phazer
.338 Win Mag
From a non-lawyer perspective, Judge Sinatra's decision appears to be logical and well-reasoned.
Far king
.45 acp
I think likewise.
I also like his latest ruling. But this still leaves us unable to fly with a firearm (checked, of course) as NY still threatens to arrest us in airports.
If he continues his current trend, his upcoming ruling on carrying in public parks and in public transportation could be damned interesting,- especially since Buffalo DOES have a subway!
If he continues his current trend, his upcoming ruling on carrying in public parks and in public transportation could be damned interesting,- especially since Buffalo DOES have a subway!
Depick
.308 Win
I really like this Judge Sinatra.
US RIFLE M1A
.45 acp
"Legislative enactments may not eviscerate the Bill of Rights. Every day they do, is one too many."
Steal2B
.700 Nitro Express
If you take time to read though the decision one will see why the injunction was granted.
At least what i get from it the Judge writes that the injunction was granted based on the fact that the Plaintiffs will come out of this with a ruling that is favorable towards them and the Defendants(State) will lose. He sites decisions from more then Bruan and plainly states the injunctions granted based on the fact that the state does not have standing and will lose.
If i missed the mark someone else who read the decisions correct me but this is the 4th time the law was reported to be unconstitutional in a court decisions.
I would think in a normal world the state really can't win any of these cases. They wrote themselves into a corner with this law.
At least what i get from it the Judge writes that the injunction was granted based on the fact that the Plaintiffs will come out of this with a ruling that is favorable towards them and the Defendants(State) will lose. He sites decisions from more then Bruan and plainly states the injunctions granted based on the fact that the state does not have standing and will lose.
If i missed the mark someone else who read the decisions correct me but this is the 4th time the law was reported to be unconstitutional in a court decisions.
I would think in a normal world the state really can't win any of these cases. They wrote themselves into a corner with this law.
US RIFLE M1A
.45 acp
I am not a lawyer, but from what I hear in the lawyer and LE world, is that this law (CCIA) is now entirely unenforceable.
For a CCIA-based arrest to stick, this new ruling would have to be stayed, AND the state would have to have a perfect, 100% UNBROKEN success rate for the duration of FOUR (or more, if new cases arise) separate cases, all the way to AND including SCOTUS for a CCIA arrest case to stick.
All this takes into account that the CCIA has had NO positive ruling on the merits, the only luck it has had has been administrative.
If this new decision is stayed, and someone is subsequently arrested. at any moment any judge rules against the CCIA (and there are permanent injunction trials coming up that will likely end that way) the arrest will have to be dropped AND the arresting department will be subject to monumental lawsuits.
This is where the judge's wording of 'likely to succeed on the merits' come in. A warning not to enforce whether or not the temp injunction is stayed.
Again, I am not a lawyer.
For a CCIA-based arrest to stick, this new ruling would have to be stayed, AND the state would have to have a perfect, 100% UNBROKEN success rate for the duration of FOUR (or more, if new cases arise) separate cases, all the way to AND including SCOTUS for a CCIA arrest case to stick.
All this takes into account that the CCIA has had NO positive ruling on the merits, the only luck it has had has been administrative.
If this new decision is stayed, and someone is subsequently arrested. at any moment any judge rules against the CCIA (and there are permanent injunction trials coming up that will likely end that way) the arrest will have to be dropped AND the arresting department will be subject to monumental lawsuits.
This is where the judge's wording of 'likely to succeed on the merits' come in. A warning not to enforce whether or not the temp injunction is stayed.
Again, I am not a lawyer.