TN bill would ban private businesses from saying no firearms

[spat]

No I'm arguing the fact that a silly tyrannical business owner has no right to tell me I can't wear green pants or a ................MASK! You don't have that right! Take your discrimination and shove it. If I am not a threat than stick it.

You're correct, a private business owner has no right to tell you what you can wear.

But they do have every right to tell you whether you can patronize their business or not.

Trespassing is a thing.

If you want a loophole, "we are not a public business, we are a private club that serves everyone except the guy named Defilade".

 

[Darth]

No I'm arguing the fact that a silly tyrannical business owner has no right to tell me I can't wear green pants or a ................MASK! You don't have that right! Take your discrimination and shove it. If I am not a threat than stick it.

First of all, a private business cannot by "tyrannical", as that, by definition, involves the government. You have such trouble grasping this, but if you overcome this, much of the laws of this land will begin to make sense.

They don't have a right to tell you what to wear. Established already. They cannot force you to wear anything. They can, however, deny the voluntary business interaction of your inhabiting their property. They absolutely, thankfully, have that right for their business. No matter who they serve.

 

[spat]

Dress code, not a law. You discriminated against what I wore.

Which is perfectly legal.

There is a concept in law called a "protected class". Those are the *only* types of discrimination that are forbidden.

In general discrimination is perfectly acceptable with only a few exceptions.

Look at the recent push to add "gender identity" to the list of protected classes. In many states it *isn't* in the list and is therefore an acceptable means to discriminate.

What are protected classes in US law?
Applicants, employees and former employees are protected from employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, sexual orientation, or gender identity), national origin, age (40 or older), disability and genetic information (including family medical history)

3. Who is protected from employment discrimination?

FAQ #3: Who is protected from employment discrimination?

www.eeoc.gov

 

[Defilade]

Why has not one person sued and won over this??

How do you know that?

 

[Defilade]

Which is perfectly legal.

There is a concept in law called a "protected class". Those are the *only* types of discrimination that are forbidden.

In general discrimination is perfectly acceptable with only a few exceptions.

Look at the recent push to add "gender identity" to the list of protected classes. In many states it *isn't* in the list and is therefore an acceptable means to discriminate.

3. Who is protected from employment discrimination?

FAQ #3: Who is protected from employment discrimination?

www.eeoc.gov

You mention shirt/shoes... Add Turbin or ballcap and see how that works..

 

[Defilade]

Any business is a public accommodation. They have to abide by federal and state law

 

[Darth]

Any business is a public accommodation. They have to abide by federal and state law

They are.

 

[spat]

Any business is a public accommodation. They have to abide by federal and state law

They do, but neither state nor federal law prohibits dress codes.

 

[spat]

You mention shirt/shoes... Add Turbin or ballcap and see how that works..

Turban would only be protected for bona fide members of a religious order that requires them to be worn at all times, and even then only in limited circumstances.

Pretty sure you can ban ball caps anytime you want.

 

[nortatoga]

Any business is a public accommodation. They have to abide by federal and state law

Yes they have to abide by Federal and State law.

Federal Law...

Title II Of The Civil Rights Act (Public Accommodations)

www.justice.gov

42 U.S.C. §2000a (a)All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin.

State Law...

State Public Accommodation Laws

All states with a public accommodation law prohibit discrimination on the grounds of race, gender, ancestry and religion.

www.ncsl.org

Please point to were either of these say carrying a firearm is a protected group!!

 

[nortatoga]

OMG Stop!

U.S. CIVIL RIGHTS PROTECTION

Private business has a LEGAL CLASSIFICATION as a "public accommodation" according to federal law, Title III Reg 28 CFR §36.104.

Your private business serves the public and therefore must abide by all state and federal laws. No business policy, No governor's mandate, order, health order, emergency or pandemic supersedes our Constitutionally- protected rights or supersedes the law.

This business is open to the public, and I am the public. Your denial of my service violates several federal laws.

Federal law 28 CFR §36.202 prohibits "denial of participation" from this business establishment. §36.202(c) states that unless I have been individually assessed as a "direct threat" you may not exclude me from the SAME and EQUAL services as others.

Denying my service or requiring me to be served outside or be limited to home delivery is a VIOLATION of Title , | and VII of the U.S. Civil Right Act of 1964.

Title III, Sections §36.202(a)(b)(c) and §36.203(a)(b)(c) states that I shall not be denied the same PARTICIPATION and EQUAL ACCESS as everyone else. The law prohibits you from serving me separately or differently.

And again you don't post the link from were you quote..

So here it is! Carrying Firearms are not protected under the ADA..

Federal Register :: Request Access

www.ecfr.gov

 

[Defilade]

Yes they have to abide by Federal and State law.

Federal Law...

Title II Of The Civil Rights Act (Public Accommodations)

www.justice.gov

42 U.S.C. §2000a (a)All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin.

State Law...

State Public Accommodation Laws

All states with a public accommodation law prohibit discrimination on the grounds of race, gender, ancestry and religion.

www.ncsl.org

Please point to were either of these say carrying a firearm is a protected group!!

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artVI-C2-1/ALDE_00013395/

Article VI, Clause 2:

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

 

[Grimscale]

Pretty sure you can ban ball caps anytime you want.

i actually know of a bank that does that.
They have signs stating they can refuse service unless you remove any hat or sunglasses.

 

[spat]

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artVI-C2-1/ALDE_00013395/

Article VI, Clause 2:

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

Nobody is disputing that all businesses in the US have to follow all federal laws.

We are saying that your interpretation of what federal law requires is wrong.

Discrimination is in general perfectly legal, and even encouraged.

It is only discrimination for a few very specific reasons that's prohibited.

 

[gun_slinger_boy]

Here's the thing. Even if you could legally discriminate based on sex, religion, race, nationality etc, the free market would quickly decide if that business could stay operational. Especially in today's world.

 

[nortatoga]

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artVI-C2-1/ALDE_00013395/

Article VI, Clause 2:

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

Yes and the Federal law I posted listed race, color, religion, or national origin. And the State laws all list the same and then some, so your Article 6 post is irrelevant to this topic as carrying firearms is not a protected class!

A lot of good reading on-line under this topic.

does the constitution apply to private businesses

Do the Constitution and Bill of Rights apply to private business?


The guarantees of the Bill of Rights apply only to state and federal government action. They do not limit what a company or person in the private sector may do.

What are the 3 constitutional protections for private businesses?


Some of the specific aspects of the Constitution that affect businesses include: The commerce clause. The right to free speech. The right to free association.

Can a private company violate my constitutional rights?


The First Amendment does not apply to private actors, such as private businesses. However, some state and federal employment laws protect some of your speech in the workplace. If you are a public employee, your speech can still be limited so as not to disrupt workplace efficiency.

Does the 14th Amendment apply to private businesses?


—The Fourteenth Amendment, by its terms, limits discrimination only by governmental entities, not by private parties.

 

[nortatoga]

Can a Business Prohibit Guns?​

Can a Business Prohibit Guns? - FindLaw

Despite the Second Amendment right to bear arms, businesses across the country are free to adopt their own policies regulating and even prohibiting guns. Businesses are free to ban guns from their property. However, in some states, there may be some hurdles to jump (or signs to post) before...

www.findlaw.com

By George Khoury, Esq. on January 04, 2017 | Last updated on March 21, 2019
Despite the Second Amendment right to bear arms, businesses across the country are free to adopt their own policies regulating and even prohibiting guns. Businesses are free to ban guns from their property. However, in some states, there may be some hurdles to jump (or signs to post) before doing so.

For the most part, guns are regulated by state laws. Many states already have laws about when, how, and where guns may be carried, such as prohibiting guns from being carried into establishments that serve alcohol. However, some states like Texas and Georgia require businesses to post conspicuous signage explaining when guns are not permitted on the premises.

Customers With Guns​

Since gun ownership is a highly divisive issue, many business owners prefer to stay out of the debate. As mentioned above, some states require businesses to post specific signage at the entrance if they want to ban guns from their premises. And while in some states it may be illegal to carry a gun in some businesses, there may be serious problems with enforcement.

One significant issue with prohibiting guns in businesses is the actual enforcement of the policy. Since frequently gun owners are carrying concealed weapons, employees may not be able to enforce the policy if they cannot see the weapon. Additionally, some employees may be intimidated by customers that have guns, and may be afraid to ask a customer to leave the premises and return without their firearm.

Employees With Guns​

Generally, an employer may not be able to prevent an employee from purchasing or owning a firearm. However, an employer may prohibit an employee from bringing that firearm into the office. Typically, an employer is free to adopt their own workplace policies, and a policy prohibiting employees from bringing firearms to work would seem to be a reasonable policy to protect against workplace violence.

Recently, a DA's office in New York was the center of controversy after a new policy went into effect that prohibited employees from owning handguns. The short-lived policy (it only lasted about a week) illustrates that while an employer is free to create policies, going too far can be bad for business and create unintended controversy.

Related Resources:

• Find Business and Commercial Lawyers Near You (FindLaw's Lawyer Directory)
• 3 Top Concerns About Guns at Work (FindLaw's Free Enterprise)
• Starbucks CEO to Customers: Leave Guns at Home (FindLaw's Free Enterprise)
• Top 5 Tips for Workplace Gun Policies (FindLaw's Free Enterprise)

 

[nortatoga]

Key Questions for New York and New Jersey Businesses Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s Gun Decision​

Duane Morris LLP - Key Questions for New York and New Jersey Businesses Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s Gun Decision

www.duanemorris.com

Will Businesses Be Permitted to Ban Firearms from Their Establishments?​

Yes, private property owners, including businesses open to the public, will have the right to ban firearms from their property.

The Second Amendment prohibits only governmental restrictions on firearms. Private property owners, including businesses, may ban firearms on their property. Businesses seeking to ban firearms on their property should post a sign indicating as such. Some states have statutory requirements for such signage, but it remains to be seen whether similar laws will be passed in New York and New Jersey. If a business does choose to ban firearms, it should consider what measures it will take to enforce that ban and provide employees with clear instructions on how to proceed should someone bring a firearm onto the premises.

@Defilade should I continue?

 

[Defilade]

Key Questions for New York and New Jersey Businesses Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s Gun Decision​

Duane Morris LLP - Key Questions for New York and New Jersey Businesses Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s Gun Decision

www.duanemorris.com

Will Businesses Be Permitted to Ban Firearms from Their Establishments?​

Yes, private property owners, including businesses open to the public, will have the right to ban firearms from their property.

The Second Amendment prohibits only governmental restrictions on firearms. Private property owners, including businesses, may ban firearms on their property. Businesses seeking to ban firearms on their property should post a sign indicating as such. Some states have statutory requirements for such signage, but it remains to be seen whether similar laws will be passed in New York and New Jersey. If a business does choose to ban firearms, it should consider what measures it will take to enforce that ban and provide employees with clear instructions on how to proceed should someone bring a firearm onto the premises.

@Defilade should I continue?

Bullshit Article!! The 2nd Amendment is not suspended for someone's policy! Once again policy is NOT Law! Show me in the Constitution( Supreme law of the land) where it is to be suspend for a policy? lol

 

[nortatoga]

Bullshit Article!! The 2nd Amendment is not suspended for someone's policy! Once again policy is NOT Law! Show me in the Constitution( Supreme law of the land) where it is to be suspend for a policy? lol

Where does anything I posted say that the Constitution is suspended?

 

[Defilade]

Where does anything I posted say that the Constitution is suspended?

You are stating that policy trumps the right of the individual for a public accommodation. Policy has no standing. The pecking order factually by law is as follows:
1) Constitutions
2) Legislative Laws
3) Administrative Laws
4) Case Law
Number 2 can never supercede number 1.

 

[GOPerfect]

How do you know that?

Because I researched the hell out of the past couple of days and found not one, court case of a lawsuit. Not a single one.

 

[GOPerfect]

Bullshit Article!! The 2nd Amendment is not suspended for someone's policy! Once again policy is NOT Law! Show me in the Constitution( Supreme law of the land) where it is to be suspend for a policy? lol

The guarantees of the Bill of Rights apply only to state and federal government action. They do not limit what a company or person in the private sector may do.

 

[GOPerfect]

Can You Sue a Private Company for Constitutional Violations? – Noel Caldwell, Attorney at Law PLLC

www.noelcaldwell.com

 

[dsdmmat]

@Defilade you obviously have never owned a business. If you had you would realize you are completely wrong on so many points. The constitution is rules for governments not for people.

 

[spat]

You are stating that policy trumps the right of the individual for a public accommodation. Policy has no standing. The pecking order factually by law is as follows:
1) Constitutions
2) Legislative Laws
3) Administrative Laws
4) Case Law
Number 2 can never supercede number 1.

A public accommodation is only relevant for a few very specific categories under disability law.

It says nothing about having to serve anyone for any reason.

If you want to run a bar and tell the bouncer watching the door "no ugly people", that's perfectly acceptable.

 

[Defilade]

A public accommodation is only relevant for a few very specific categories under disability law.

It says nothing about having to serve anyone for any reason.

If you want to run a bar and tell the bouncer watching the door "no ugly people", that's perfectly acceptable.

Just an example when a Face Diaper is imposed on someone entering a private business as I posted earlier:




U.S. CIVIL RIGHTS PROTECTION
The evils of government are directly proportional to the tolerance of the people: ~ ~ Frank Kent

I HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT TO ENTER, SHOP AND BE SERVED AT THIS BUSINESS -- AS PROTECTED BY LAW -- WITHOUT COVERING MY FACE

This private business has a LEGAL CLASSIFICATION as a "public accommodation" according to federal law, Title III Reg 28 CFR §36.104.

Your Private business serves the public and therefore must abide by all state and federal laws. No business policy, No governor's mandate, order, health order, emergency or pandemic supersedes our Constitutionally- protected rights or supersedes the law.

This business is open to the public, and I am the public. Your denial of my service violates several federal laws.

Federal law 28 CFR §36.202 prohibits "denial of participation" from this business establishment. §36.202(c) states that unless I have been individually assessed as a "direct threat" you may not exclude me from the SAME and EQUAL services as others.

Denying my service or requiring me to be served outside or be limited to home delivery is a VIOLATION of Title , | and VII of the U.S. Civil Right Act of 1964.

Title III, Sections §36.202(a)(b)(c) and §36.203(a)(b)(c) states that I shall not be denied the same PARTICIPATION and EQUAL ACCESS as everyone else. The law prohibits you from serving me separately or differently.

By denying entry to a customer who is not wearing a mask for either medical or religious reasons, YOU ARE IN VIOLATION of at least 5 federal laws and 16 Utah state laws, including:
Utah Constitution Article 1, sections 1, 4, 15
Utah Medical Practice Act 58-67-301
Utah Revised Statutes 76-8-512
Utah Civil Rights Code 13-7-1
Utah Labor Code 62A-5b-103
Utah Labor Code 35A-5-105
Utah Civil Rights Code 13-7-3
Utah Criminal Code 76-5-304
Utah Criminal Code 76-9-102 2
Utah Criminal Code 76-5-106
Utah Criminal Code 76-6-404.5
Utah Criminal Code 76-10-801
Utah Criminal Code 76-4-201
Utah Criminal Code 76-5-106.5 2

As such, this business is PROHIBITED from unlawful discrimination by denying the entry of any member of the public who is not disturbing the peace.
To do so is a crime of FALSE IMPRISONMENT, and you will be held personally liable for this crime.

These premises are open to the public and thus any charge of "trespass" is a false accusation on me, as I am complying with all lawful conditions allowing me to remain on these premises. However...
Force applied to me is a trespass and carries with it a number of fines between $75,000. and $250,000. And up to 1-10 years in prison, and up to life in prison if bodily injury occurs, or the death penalty if death to me occurs.

This is your NOTICE AND ACCEPTANCE OF LIABILITY!
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal

I, _____ certify this notice has been properly served on ____employee/agent of _____Corp./LLC etc... at ____
_____city ______state

X ________ date _____

Location: ____________

Date & time: __________

Name of Discriminator(s): ___________

Name of person(s) Discriminated Against: ________

Witness(es): ___________

Notes: ____________

ATTENTION: GOVERNMENT AGENTS
PLEASE PROVIDE LAWFUL AND NECESSARY CONSIDERATION TO AID THE BEARER IN THE UNIMPEDED EXERCISE OF CONTITUTIONALLY PROTECTD RIGHTS.

Report religious discrimination by submitting your complaint to the Civil Rights Division Department of Justice in writing. Via Online: Your message to the Department of Justice
Mailing: 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington,DC 20530 | Fax: 202-307-1379

 

[spat]

Just an example when a Face Diaper is imposed on someone entering a private business as I posted earlier:




U.S. CIVIL RIGHTS PROTECTION
The evils of government are directly proportional to the tolerance of the people: ~ ~ Frank Kent

I HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT TO ENTER, SHOP AND BE SERVED AT THIS BUSINESS -- AS PROTECTED BY LAW -- WITHOUT COVERING MY FACE

This private business has a LEGAL CLASSIFICATION as a "public accommodation" according to federal law, Title III Reg 28 CFR §36.104.

Your Private business serves the public and therefore must abide by all state and federal laws. No business policy, No governor's mandate, order, health order, emergency or pandemic supersedes our Constitutionally- protected rights or supersedes the law.

This business is open to the public, and I am the public. Your denial of my service violates several federal laws.

Federal law 28 CFR §36.202 prohibits "denial of participation" from this business establishment. §36.202(c) states that unless I have been individually assessed as a "direct threat" you may not exclude me from the SAME and EQUAL services as others.

Denying my service or requiring me to be served outside or be limited to home delivery is a VIOLATION of Title , | and VII of the U.S. Civil Right Act of 1964.

Title III, Sections §36.202(a)(b)(c) and §36.203(a)(b)(c) states that I shall not be denied the same PARTICIPATION and EQUAL ACCESS as everyone else. The law prohibits you from serving me separately or differently.

By denying entry to a customer who is not wearing a mask for either medical or religious reasons, YOU ARE IN VIOLATION of at least 5 federal laws and 16 Utah state laws, including:
Utah Constitution Article 1, sections 1, 4, 15
Utah Medical Practice Act 58-67-301
Utah Revised Statutes 76-8-512
Utah Civil Rights Code 13-7-1
Utah Labor Code 62A-5b-103
Utah Labor Code 35A-5-105
Utah Civil Rights Code 13-7-3
Utah Criminal Code 76-5-304
Utah Criminal Code 76-9-102 2
Utah Criminal Code 76-5-106
Utah Criminal Code 76-6-404.5
Utah Criminal Code 76-10-801
Utah Criminal Code 76-4-201
Utah Criminal Code 76-5-106.5 2

As such, this business is PROHIBITED from unlawful discrimination by denying the entry of any member of the public who is not disturbing the peace.
To do so is a crime of FALSE IMPRISONMENT, and you will be held personally liable for this crime.

These premises are open to the public and thus any charge of "trespass" is a false accusation on me, as I am complying with all lawful conditions allowing me to remain on these premises. However...
Force applied to me is a trespass and carries with it a number of fines between $75,000. and $250,000. And up to 1-10 years in prison, and up to life in prison if bodily injury occurs, or the death penalty if death to me occurs.

This is your NOTICE AND ACCEPTANCE OF LIABILITY!
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal

I, _____ certify this notice has been properly served on ____employee/agent of _____Corp./LLC etc... at ____
_____city ______state

X ________ date _____

Location: ____________

Date & time: __________

Name of Discriminator(s): ___________

Name of person(s) Discriminated Against: ________

Witness(es): ___________

Notes: ____________

ATTENTION: GOVERNMENT AGENTS
PLEASE PROVIDE LAWFUL AND NECESSARY CONSIDERATION TO AID THE BEARER IN THE UNIMPEDED EXERCISE OF CONTITUTIONALLY PROTECTD RIGHTS.

Report religious discrimination by submitting your complaint to the Civil Rights Division Department of Justice in writing. Via Online: Your message to the Department of Justice
Mailing: 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington,DC 20530 | Fax: 202-307-1379

Right, they're a public accommodation.

Sure, they're prohibited from *unlawful* discrimination.

The piece that your missing is that only a few specific types of discrimination are unlawful.

Dress codes in general are *not* unlawful discrimination. Therefore they are perfectly legal even for "public accommodations".

The stuff you're reading is all about disability law. It's the stuff that says you need wheelchair ramps and handicapped bathrooms.

It does not say you can't have all manner of *legally permissible" discrimination.

Any business that isn't the government is perfectly welcome to post a "no democrats allowed" sign and have a guy at the door checking for voter registration cards.

 

[Defilade]

Right, they're a public accommodation.

Sure, they're prohibited from *unlawful* discrimination.

The piece that your missing is that only a few specific types of discrimination are unlawful.

Dress codes in general are *not* unlawful discrimination. Therefore they are perfectly legal even for "public accommodations".

The stuff you're reading is all about disability law. It's the stuff that says you need wheelchair ramps and handicapped bathrooms.

It does not say you can't have all manner of *legally permissible" discrimination.

Any business that isn't the government is perfectly welcome to post a "no democrats allowed" sign and have a guy at the door checking for voter registration cards.

Sorry. I disagree with that one. Lol.... I used to bounce at a club many moons ago. Pretty sure the owner could not say no ugly people allowed and then select the ugly's for removal. That would be lawsuit city!

 

[nortatoga]

Just an example when a Face Diaper is imposed on someone entering a private business as I posted earlier:




U.S. CIVIL RIGHTS PROTECTION
The evils of government are directly proportional to the tolerance of the people: ~ ~ Frank Kent

I HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT TO ENTER, SHOP AND BE SERVED AT THIS BUSINESS -- AS PROTECTED BY LAW -- WITHOUT COVERING MY FACE

This private business has a LEGAL CLASSIFICATION as a "public accommodation" according to federal law, Title III Reg 28 CFR §36.104.

Your Private business serves the public and therefore must abide by all state and federal laws. No business policy, No governor's mandate, order, health order, emergency or pandemic supersedes our Constitutionally- protected rights or supersedes the law.

This business is open to the public, and I am the public. Your denial of my service violates several federal laws.

Federal law 28 CFR §36.202 prohibits "denial of participation" from this business establishment. §36.202(c) states that unless I have been individually assessed as a "direct threat" you may not exclude me from the SAME and EQUAL services as others.

Denying my service or requiring me to be served outside or be limited to home delivery is a VIOLATION of Title , | and VII of the U.S. Civil Right Act of 1964.

Title III, Sections §36.202(a)(b)(c) and §36.203(a)(b)(c) states that I shall not be denied the same PARTICIPATION and EQUAL ACCESS as everyone else. The law prohibits you from serving me separately or differently.

By denying entry to a customer who is not wearing a mask for either medical or religious reasons, YOU ARE IN VIOLATION of at least 5 federal laws and 16 Utah state laws, including:
Utah Constitution Article 1, sections 1, 4, 15
Utah Medical Practice Act 58-67-301
Utah Revised Statutes 76-8-512
Utah Civil Rights Code 13-7-1
Utah Labor Code 62A-5b-103
Utah Labor Code 35A-5-105
Utah Civil Rights Code 13-7-3
Utah Criminal Code 76-5-304
Utah Criminal Code 76-9-102 2
Utah Criminal Code 76-5-106
Utah Criminal Code 76-6-404.5
Utah Criminal Code 76-10-801
Utah Criminal Code 76-4-201
Utah Criminal Code 76-5-106.5 2

As such, this business is PROHIBITED from unlawful discrimination by denying the entry of any member of the public who is not disturbing the peace.
To do so is a crime of FALSE IMPRISONMENT, and you will be held personally liable for this crime.

These premises are open to the public and thus any charge of "trespass" is a false accusation on me, as I am complying with all lawful conditions allowing me to remain on these premises. However...
Force applied to me is a trespass and carries with it a number of fines between $75,000. and $250,000. And up to 1-10 years in prison, and up to life in prison if bodily injury occurs, or the death penalty if death to me occurs.

This is your NOTICE AND ACCEPTANCE OF LIABILITY!
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal

I, _____ certify this notice has been properly served on ____employee/agent of _____Corp./LLC etc... at ____
_____city ______state

X ________ date _____

Location: ____________

Date & time: __________

Name of Discriminator(s): ___________

Name of person(s) Discriminated Against: ________

Witness(es): ___________

Notes: ____________

ATTENTION: GOVERNMENT AGENTS
PLEASE PROVIDE LAWFUL AND NECESSARY CONSIDERATION TO AID THE BEARER IN THE UNIMPEDED EXERCISE OF CONTITUTIONALLY PROTECTD RIGHTS.

Report religious discrimination by submitting your complaint to the Civil Rights Division Department of Justice in writing. Via Online: Your message to the Department of Justice
Mailing: 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington,DC 20530 | Fax: 202-307-1379

Why do you continue to copy and paste statements without the link from which they are coming from, is it because you are cherry-picking and the rest of the link would prove you wrong?