Trauma47645
.357 mag
No because I look at it from the point that there is supposedly an oath to protect and serve..
But that has been perverted into "to harass and collect"
The mad man took no such oath..
Revenuers prove that's all they are..
- Thread starter Trauma47645
- Start date
No because I look at it from the point that there is supposedly an oath to protect and serve..
But that has been perverted into "to harass and collect"
The mad man took no such oath..
nortatoga
.338 Win Mag
The point is you want to group them all in together !
But does the customer service rep also get blamed for not creating a situation supposedly amenable to changing policies? That's absurd.
In simple terms, when you put me in an untenable situation, do you really expect me to see your side rather than become defensive? I can't win anyway so why bother?
camper4lyfe
.308 Win
Am I completely failing in reading comprehension today that they don't actually say WHAT the cops did? Just "falsely reporting traffic stops". What does that even mean?
Trauma47645
.357 mag
you can put any arbitrary group together that you want..
point is these are supposed to be public servants.. instead they are .gov sanctioned highway men..
Trauma47645
.357 mag
And to further make the argument more valid..
Show me one Cop that has never written a ticket for a victim-less crime...
I can show you plenty of firearm owners that have never shot anyone, Plenty of White people that arent racist, ect ect..
But you cannot show one cop that has never written a summons for a victim-less crime..
Show me one Cop that has never written a ticket for a victim-less crime...
I can show you plenty of firearm owners that have never shot anyone, Plenty of White people that arent racist, ect ect..
But you cannot show one cop that has never written a summons for a victim-less crime..
spat
.950 JDJ
LOL, of course they get blamed for it. Its completely unreasonable to expect them to do anything about it, but they are the only one available to blame.
Everyone who's actually responsible has hidden behind some committee or something. Untimately people are to blame when blame needs to be assigned. The left loves to trot out "greedy corporations" as the criminal, and excuse all the regular employees as merely cogs in the machine. The right does the same with "big government", but ultimately both are just a bunch of individual people doing what they are told. The customer blames the guy on the phone, the call center employee blames "management" his supervisor blames "upper management", when the media get ahold of it and the CEO finds out what the retarded policy actually means and he tries to find out where it came from it will magically be a comittee of people who all disagreed with it but went long with the recommendation anyway.
It is shitty, but it is how the world works. All you can do is try not to put yourself in a position where you are the guy who actually has to make it happen.
I am sure the guards as auchwitz divided themselves into 2 camps, the guys who herded them into the showers but didn't turn on the gas, and the guys who turned on the gas but didnt lock anyone in. Sure there were some monsters in the Nazi party, but withiut a crap ton of otherwise good people "just doing their job" they would have been nothing more than common criminals.
I am not the one who put you in an untenable situation. You can thank the legislature for that.
ECU Pirates
.308 Win
If cameras end "professional courtesy" then I'm all for them. Keep it fair!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Although I've been the recipient of courtesy in the past multiple times , I can agree with that.
If it's fair for everyone it should eliminate rights violations. IE...illegal searches
How does observing a legitimate infraction, pulling the person over, having a decent interaction leading to a warning lead to illegal searches?
Either way professional curtesy will remain, that's something I'm not ashamed to say. Society hates cops. I get in enough trouble for nothing anyway. I'll always be willing to get in trouble to take care of our own.
Trauma47645
.357 mag
nortatoga
.338 Win Mag
Thanks?
Nah. Comedic relief is invaluable. Especially on fridays. Come on.
I'd try to remember the last time I pulled a car over but honestly I don't care. I want people like that to hate me. Whether I deserve it or not. Lol
ECU Pirates
.308 Win
So cameras will somehow end breaks for everyone but cops? How is that going to work? Cameras turned off by accident somehow?Letting co-workers slide for something everyone else gets in trouble for is disgusting. Cops writing dui's then getting away with them because of their job is about the most hypocritical thing I have ever seen. It happens all the time. I have been in the car and seen it a few times personally.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ECU Pirates
.308 Win
I've let civilians go on DWI's plenty of times so my conscience is clean. If other cops are hypocrites that's their own doing.
I've also only one time arrested someone for a marijuana charge only, and that only happened only because when we went to hand it back to him he told me to go fuck my mother. I told that story on the other site.
I speak my mind because I know I can, no matter who believes me.
I've also only one time arrested someone for a marijuana charge only, and that only happened only because when we went to hand it back to him he told me to go fuck my mother. I told that story on the other site.
I speak my mind because I know I can, no matter who believes me.
ECU Pirates
.308 Win
Airborne will have to write tickets to the people at Starbucks that mess up his flavored coffee. We all know sgt in Mayberry don't patrol!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No more starbucks after their refugee announcement, and black only! I've actually been meaning to make a BLC order soon.
ECU Pirates
.308 Win
I never liked Starbucks. The blc coffee is actually good.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Truebeliever
6.5 Creedmoor
Guy, there is a reason discretion for certain offenses are given, a 90 year old man who takes a leak on a side of building because he can't make it to bathroom shouldn't get a ticket where a health man who didn't want to be bothered to find a bathroom should.
Discretion is given in most laws and should be used often.
spat
.950 JDJ
Nope.
If there are exceptions like that, they should be reflected in the text of the law, not left up to pot luck as to what mood the officer you run into is in. Justice doesnt depend on its enforcers to be in a good mood, anything that does isn't justice.
The law has always allowed for humanity and always will. Robot world will never exist. Society overall will never accept a system that encodes every single possibility. Human reason and logic will always be part of the justice system.
nortatoga
.338 Win Mag
Be polite and respectful to an officer or be a belligerent dick head and get that same treatment from the officer! Wouldn't that make a great world to live in!!
Too this I will say, do not break the law and a pull over should not occur.
I really wish it were that easy though. There are always those who take the "power" that has been given to them and go way overboard with it.
To these officers, I say, good and see you later. These types of Officers give all of us a bad name and break the public trust.
As for Quota's, my department does not have them either. There are work standards that must be met; but no standing in front of the boss if tickets are not written.
In the Army as an MP we had a system in which we needed to maintain an average 5 contacts per shift. Those contacts could be anything, criminal, V and T or personal.
I know some here like these kinds of stories because it "Proves" their childish point of something...
EVERY single profession out there has bad employees. LE is not excluded from that. How many teachers are on the Beach right now for wrong doings with children? How many Dr.s lose their ability to practice medicine? The list goes on and on.
I will close by saying one more time Good riddance. Opens the door to hire more honest people.
For every moron who thinks that traffic enforcement is a victim-less crime( Very stupid term by the way), I can point out a story where an innocent is affected.
Take speeding... We have speed limit laws for reasons. Travel experts have come up with a system in which protects all within society while traveling on our roadways. They take everything into consideration; on/off ramps, traffic patterns, weather and much more. They figure that a good speed is "X MPH", if and when you go over that limit, your choice to follow the law, you run the risk of getting a citation. You do not have to like it. If you want these things changed, get involved; do whatever you can to get the laws changed. But most will not; they will just bitch about the other guy performing his duties!
My job is to Protect and Serve, I do that very well. I am to Protect and Serve all of society, if you drive like an asshole, you are risking others on the road; you will indeed get stopped by me...Everytime!
We focus traffic enforcement on accident prone locations. There's a whole complicated system of tracking it, and cops who write summonses off those areas are monitored and counseled if their numbers get too high.
Of course none of that is true, it's all about revenue. Duh and derp and whatever else I'm supposed to say now.
Of course none of that is true, it's all about revenue. Duh and derp and whatever else I'm supposed to say now.
Well, you must be an idiot if you believe that you guys are making a difference. People choose to drive, with that choice comes the opportunity that they may get into an accident. They have insurance to cover the damages. Who are you to stop that from happening?
You're right. I mean even when someone dies the family gets to sue so there's no valid reason to intervene to create safe driving situations.