Thanks for SAGA Second Amendment Guarantee Act

[dean3690]

Here is a link to the Breitbart article on SAGA. Take a minute to email Claudia Tenney and Nick Langworthy to thank them for introducing this important bill at the beginning of this historic MAGA session. Imagine where we would be if Paul Ryan was not a RINO and had worked the MAGA agenda at the beginning of the Congressional session in 2017. This is a brilliant end run around the courts and the the States to force States to abide by Federal Pre-emption and norms that are recognized in the majority of the nation. I'm looking for nationwide CCW reciprocity next. Any right with Constitutional protection and guarantee should not be restricted at the state level. States don't get to determine the voting age, that is handled at the Federal level. Strike while the iron is hot!

GOP Rep. Pushes Bill Prohibiting State Bans on Certain Rifles, Shotguns

Rep. Claudia Tenney introduced legislation that would prevent states from banning rifles or shotguns that are legal federally.

www.breitbart.com

 

[Robin]

Is she even going to be there to advocate for this? Still a lot go Rino's in the house and she's leaving for the UN Ambassador job. Could be a game changer if it makes it.
Robin

 

[Beerman]

Is she even going to be there to advocate for this? Still a lot go Rino's in the house and she's leaving for the UN Ambassador job. Could be a game changer if it makes it.
Robin

That’s Stefanik, not Tenney.

 

[Old Jalopy]

Things like this used to get me excited that our rights would be restored.

Here is a link to the Breitbart article on SAGA. Take a minute to email Claudia Tenney and Nick Langworthy to thank them for introducing this important bill at the beginning of this historic MAGA session. Imagine where we would be if Paul Ryan was not a RINO and had worked the MAGA agenda at the beginning of the Congressional session in 2017. This is a brilliant end run around the courts and the the States to force States to abide by Federal Pre-emption and norms that are recognized in the majority of the nation. I'm looking for nationwide CCW reciprocity next. Any right with Constitutional protection and guarantee should not be restricted at the state level. States don't get to determine the voting age, that is handled at the Federal level. Strike while the iron is hot!

GOP Rep. Pushes Bill Prohibiting State Bans on Certain Rifles, Shotguns

Rep. Claudia Tenney introduced legislation that would prevent states from banning rifles or shotguns that are legal federally.

www.breitbart.com

I agree, states should not get to over write or side step the Original Constitution! Shall Not Be Infringed means just that, and the 14th solidifies things. You have to wonder though, if passed what new tantrum will Her Anus throw to make things even worse for us like she did in the Bruen ruling.

Anyway,
It's probably hope against hope this gets green lighted but..............

 

[Vinson57]

The supreme court needs to declare the same thing in their 2A cases this year and end the work of little tyrants everywhere.

 

[libertysnake]

Here is a link to the Breitbart article on SAGA. Take a minute to email Claudia Tenney and Nick Langworthy to thank them for introducing this important bill at the beginning of this historic MAGA session. Imagine where we would be if Paul Ryan was not a RINO and had worked the MAGA agenda at the beginning of the Congressional session in 2017. This is a brilliant end run around the courts and the the States to force States to abide by Federal Pre-emption and norms that are recognized in the majority of the nation. I'm looking for nationwide CCW reciprocity next. Any right with Constitutional protection and guarantee should not be restricted at the state level. States don't get to determine the voting age, that is handled at the Federal level. Strike while the iron is hot!

GOP Rep. Pushes Bill Prohibiting State Bans on Certain Rifles, Shotguns

Rep. Claudia Tenney introduced legislation that would prevent states from banning rifles or shotguns that are legal federally.

www.breitbart.com

Why do we need a separate bill? The constitution bans nothing and is purposely broad. We should simply crack down on states that violate the federal law (2A).

 

[RedBreast21]

Why do we need a separate bill? The constitution bans nothing and is purposely broad. We should simply crack down on states that violate the federal law (2A).

And exactly what law would that be? That holds accountable states to the Constitution. What are the penalties?

 

[RedBreast21]

I think its a brilliant move. One that of course could be modified and maybe out right overturned when democrats take control again. But that would require the argument be that states could violate the Constitution and the Bill of Rights as needed by their state legislators. Interesting tight rope walk for Democrats to say one amendment can be violated and another not by a simple state law. The proverbial slippery slope argument. Good luck with that.

Emails are sent.

Time to find out who the RINO's are.

 

[spat]

The supreme court needs to declare the same thing in their 2A cases this year and end the work of little tyrants everywhere.

SCOTUS already ruled in Bruen.

What they need to do is curb stomp one of the federal judges that's ignoring their rulings.

 

[fresch]

If the state can cancel the second, then it can approve slavery. Right?

 

[Grimscale]

I would like to see SCOTUS declare that any political group who works against the Constitution is not immune to prosecution, as working against the Constitution is NOT in their job description.
Short of that, I will settle for a Law stating such. Yes, Laws can be overturned... but it will be a step in the right direction.

And exactly what law would that be? That holds accountable states to the Constitution. What are the penalties?

I say we start with treason and work our way down from there.

 

[4WHLDRFTN]

NY: Multiple Anti-gun Bills Moving! | GOA

A new legislative session brings many opportunities, and anti-gunners in the New York State Legislature have taken it upon themselves to continue the effort in disarming their citizens. As it stands, GOA is tracking multiple anti-gun bills moving through the legislature which can be seen below...

www.gunowners.org

 

[Old Jalopy]

I think this should be put before Trump and tell him to sign it as an Executive Order. If he can make an Executive Order to save something as trivial as China created and run TikTok, then an executive order reinstating our American Constitutional Rights should be far more of a priority. Just sayin'.

 

[Cooolone]

No... @Old Jalopy an EO does NOT have the force of LAW!

Law is what's needed... Congress needs to get to work! Especially on National Reciprocity, that should be the priority above all others...

Anyways, now back to our regular programming!

 

[Old Jalopy]

No... @Old Jalopy an EO does NOT have the force of LAW!

Law is what's needed... Congress needs to get to work! Especially on National Reciprocity, that should be the priority above all others...

Anyways, now back to our regular programming!

Cuomo and Hochul did it, more or less. Pass the law in the middle of the night or in a hurry-up offense, so there can be no defense to block it. Pay it forward. Do unto others..

 

[FP1201]

If the state can cancel the second, then it can approve slavery. Right?

Do you not think States are complicit in Human Trafficking? Do a search, ride the Rabbit Hole Express to the bottom.

 

[Acer-m14]

And exactly what law would that be? That holds accountable states to the Constitution. What are the penalties?

you see when you take the oath to defend the Constitution and then don't

that part at the end so help me god ..

well your going to meet him now so you can explain why you didn't uphold it ..

• 18 U.S.C. § 242 makes it a crime to willfully deprive a person of a right protected by the Constitution.

 

[RedBreast21]

you see when you take the oath to defend the Constitution and then don't

that part at the end so help me god ..

well your going to meet him now so you can explain why you didn't uphold it ..

• makes it a crime to willfully deprive a person of a right protected by the Constitution.

18 U.S.C. § 242. This provision makes it a crime for someone acting under color of law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. It is not necessary that the offense be motivated by racial bias or by any other animus.


Defendants act under color of law when they wield power vested by a government entity. Those prosecuted under the statute typically include police officers, sheriff’s deputies, and prison guards. However other government actors, such as judges, district attorneys, other public officials, and public school employees can also act under color of law and can be prosecuted under this statute.


Section 242 does not criminalize any particular type of abusive conduct. Instead, it incorporates by reference rights defined by the Constitution, federal statutes, and interpretive case law. Cases charged by federal prosecutors most often involve physical or sexual assaults. The Department has also prosecuted public officials for thefts, false arrests, evidence-planting, and failing to protect someone in custody from constitutional violations committed by others.


A violation of the statute is a misdemeanor, unless prosecutors prove one of the statutory aggravating factors such as a bodily injury, use of a dangerous weapon, kidnapping, aggravated sexual abuse, death resulting, or attempt to kill, in which case there are graduated penalties up to and including life in prison or death. If charged in conjunction with 18 U.S.C. § 250, as noted below, all sexual assaults under color of law are felonies.


I don't think people understand or will like this outcome. So my original comment stands. Its a brilliant move by that Rep from NY 27.

 

[FP1201]

18 U.S.C. § 242. This provision makes it a crime for someone acting under color of law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. It is not necessary that the offense be motivated by racial bias or by any other animus.


Defendants act under color of law when they wield power vested by a government entity. Those prosecuted under the statute typically include police officers, sheriff’s deputies, and prison guards. However other government actors, such as judges, district attorneys, other public officials, and public school employees can also act under color of law and can be prosecuted under this statute.


Section 242 does not criminalize any particular type of abusive conduct. Instead, it incorporates by reference rights defined by the Constitution, federal statutes, and interpretive case law. Cases charged by federal prosecutors most often involve physical or sexual assaults. The Department has also prosecuted public officials for thefts, false arrests, evidence-planting, and failing to protect someone in custody from constitutional violations committed by others.


A violation of the statute is a misdemeanor, unless prosecutors prove one of the statutory aggravating factors such as a bodily injury, use of a dangerous weapon, kidnapping, aggravated sexual abuse, death resulting, or attempt to kill, in which case there are graduated penalties up to and including life in prison or death. If charged in conjunction with 18 U.S.C. § 250, as noted below, all sexual assaults under color of law are felonies.


I don't think people understand or will like this outcome. So my original comment stands. Its a brilliant move by that Rep from NY 27.

I wonder how many, how often cases involving this Law have gone to trial in the last two decades?

 

[Acer-m14]

I wonder how many, how often cases involving this Law have gone to trial in the last two decades?

none because we have a leftest court system and no law enforcement. they are all to chicken to walk in and arrest a mayor or governor

hell we got one now begging trump to arrest him .. fucking do it !! be Nike ..

 

[spat]

18 U.S.C. § 242. This provision makes it a crime for someone acting under color of law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. It is not necessary that the offense be motivated by racial bias or by any other animus.


Defendants act under color of law when they wield power vested by a government entity. Those prosecuted under the statute typically include police officers, sheriff’s deputies, and prison guards. However other government actors, such as judges, district attorneys, other public officials, and public school employees can also act under color of law and can be prosecuted under this statute.


Section 242 does not criminalize any particular type of abusive conduct. Instead, it incorporates by reference rights defined by the Constitution, federal statutes, and interpretive case law. Cases charged by federal prosecutors most often involve physical or sexual assaults. The Department has also prosecuted public officials for thefts, false arrests, evidence-planting, and failing to protect someone in custody from constitutional violations committed by others.


A violation of the statute is a misdemeanor, unless prosecutors prove one of the statutory aggravating factors such as a bodily injury, use of a dangerous weapon, kidnapping, aggravated sexual abuse, death resulting, or attempt to kill, in which case there are graduated penalties up to and including life in prison or death. If charged in conjunction with 18 U.S.C. § 250, as noted below, all sexual assaults under color of law are felonies.


I don't think people understand or will like this outcome. So my original comment stands. Its a brilliant move by that Rep from NY 27.

Note that there is no exception for legislators.

People should go to prison for voting for some of these bills.

 

[Brawny71]

The NYS constitution has the same word reiterated.

 

[pshift]

Human trafficking is only illegal because the elite want it that way to keep the best people (adults and kids) for themselves.

 

[RedBreast21]

Note that there is no exception for legislators.

People should go to prison for voting for some of these bills.

But there is no penalty. I would like to see one for sure.

 

[RedBreast21]

I wonder how many, how often cases involving this Law have gone to trial in the last two decades?

I might just have to look that up.