Curmudgeon
.308 Win
So, how were the Dems?
Schumer admitted that taxation is theft. Pelosi seemed to have an orgasm when he said that.
So, how were the Dems?
In reality NO in their minds but of courseI know that. Did they have ANY thing that could be considered a blow against Trump?
So, business as usual.Pelosi looks high, her eyes are bugging out and schumer looks like he is using a vibrating butt plug
IMO, Congress should consider that the USA could be viewed as an "attractive nuisance", too irresistible to the impatient adults and children who want to come to the USA from south of the border and do it now and illegally. Building more of the wall and adding the other security measures at the southern border, as put forward by President Trump, would show the USA has taken "reasonable measures to eliminate the danger [ of crossing Mexico into the USA illegally ] posed by the condition" of the attractiveness of the USA's prosperity and civil society.
Although the definition of an " attractive nuisance " usually applies to children, it could possibly be stretched to include adults, given the right lawyers.
This is taken for "howstuffworks" :
An attractive nuisance is an object, structure or condition that is both dangerous and irresistibly inviting or intriguing to children. Under attractive nuisance law, a landowner can be held responsible if a child is injured by an "artificial condition" on the landowner's property and all five of the following criteria are met:
- The landowner knows (or should know) that children are likely to trespass on the property.
- The condition on the property has the potential to cause death or serious bodily harm to children.
- The children involved are too young or inexperienced to understand the risk presented by the condition.
- The benefit of maintaining the condition or the cost required to remedy the condition is minimal compared with the risk to children.
- The landowner fails to take reasonable measures to eliminate the danger posed by the condition.
IMO, the Congress and President Trump owe improved border security, including the wall, to the citizens and legal immigrants in the USA .
This is only common sense and it is, after all, for the children.
Why aren't they spending this 150 billion on inner city Americans living in poverty?
I disagree. It would be fixed with a check/money. Pay for a wall around the cities and leave them, ala escape from NYWhat's wrong with our inner cities can't be fixed with a check, no matter how large it is.
That concept is what the democrats are completely unable to understand, they think the solution to every problem is to throw more taxpayer money at it.