The right to live without assault weapons
- Thread starter gunpoliticsny
- Start date
BDinPutnam
.475 A&M Magnum
I have the right to defend myself "by whatever means necessary", to coin a phrase, if I'm assaulted*.
*I do not per se have the "right" to not be assaulted.
*I do not per se have the "right" to not be assaulted.
Deplorable Me
.700 Nitro Express
All firearms matter.
Black guns matter
PutnamCharlie
6.5 Creedmoor
With a last name like F**kass of course she is a douche. That was too easy 
BDinPutnam
.475 A&M Magnum
With a last name like F**kass of course she is a douche. That was too easy
Yeah but someone had to do it.
spat
.700 Nitro Express
I absolutely support the right to live without assault weapons.
Nobody should be forced to purchase them.
If you are a conscientious objector you absolutely should be allowed to fulfill your militia duty with a bolt action sniper rifle instead.
Nobody should be forced to purchase them.
If you are a conscientious objector you absolutely should be allowed to fulfill your militia duty with a bolt action sniper rifle instead.
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
She has the right to live without an assault riffle just like I have the right to have one. Fuck her if she thinks she can take mine kr anyone else’s.
JaguarJaguarGolf
6.5 Creedmoor
She is not required to bear arms
She is required to be a loyal citizen and support the Constitution.
She can roll bandages, dig fighting positions, donate blood.
She is required to be a loyal citizen and support the Constitution.
She can roll bandages, dig fighting positions, donate blood.
She "SERVED" Obama? Really?
I wonder what her constituents think about that statement!
Elected representatives of the Legislative Branch don't serve the Executive...! They are separate and for good reason. But whatever... She's another koolaid dispenser that gets high on her own supply!
I wonder what her constituents think about that statement!
Elected representatives of the Legislative Branch don't serve the Executive...! They are separate and for good reason. But whatever... She's another koolaid dispenser that gets high on her own supply!
libertysnake
.338 Win Mag
You know, going back to the covid "wear masks" thing. Even then, I don't think people who don't wear masks should be locked up. They don't have a right to entry of a private business without one, if the private business requires it.
This is above and beyond even that. This is something specificly written into the constitution. You can't just strip that from people when it's specifically granted.
This is above and beyond even that. This is something specificly written into the constitution. You can't just strip that from people when it's specifically granted.
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
I’ll disagree she doesn’t have to support the constitution. I could careless and there no requirement to support the constitution. The constitution just tells you what rights you have that the government can’t strip away.
Private businesses can still deny that though.
And it isn't "granted" in the Constitution. No rights are.
libertysnake
.338 Win Mag
In the 2nd amendment, then. To be clear.
Nothing is granted in the 2A?
meketrefe
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Well, the 2A and perhaps some universal human and natural rights, are in total opposition with "the feel-good right" to have a
disarmed population so if she doesn't like that then she is welcome to move to one little island in the pacific
where all is sun, sandy beaches and coconuts.
I don't disagree with her, but she needs to find the place where that is possible.
And also we know there is not such thing as assault weapons or assault vehicles, it is a scare tactic to induce
fear in the mind of the ignorant and fearful.
She has the right to live without assault rifles right here...
meketrefe
.450/400 Nitro Ex
In her house yes. In the country at the expense of disarming others, no.
...semantics...
Did you actually read my post?
meketrefe
.450/400 Nitro Ex
No. lol ...aint got time for that.
The Constitution "recognizes" those Rights, doesn't tell anything. And by example, the Gov't does a pretty good job of focusing and limiting, if not completely denying many, if not most of those Rights. That said...
The ONLY Right, within the Bill of Rights, specifically noted "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" is continually trampled! Let alone here in NY. But in NY we have our own Constitution and there is no 2A in it... I could keep going, but, anyways...
Not disagreeing with you, just wanted to expand upon your post