livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
Joe Biden: “No Amendment To The Constitution Is Absolute”
Joe Biden: “No Amendment To The Constitution Is Absolute”
- Thread starter livingston
- Start date
Something a new dictator would say. So much for his oath, when does the impeachment start?
One other thing, those constitutionals right weren't give to us by the gov, so the gov can't take them away. Nice try joe, go smoke some Crack with your son.
One other thing, those constitutionals right weren't give to us by the gov, so the gov can't take them away. Nice try joe, go smoke some Crack with your son.
Jmac00
.475 A&M Magnum
REALLY?
the right to LIFE = ABSOLUTE
the right to LIBERTY = ABSOLUTE
the right to self-protection = ABSOLUTE
the right to tell the government to fuck themselves = ABSOLUTE
the right to LIFE = ABSOLUTE
the right to LIBERTY = ABSOLUTE
the right to self-protection = ABSOLUTE
the right to tell the government to fuck themselves = ABSOLUTE
D.C. needs an exterminator. There seem to be a lot of really loud crickets down there.
An enema.
GOYABEAN
.950 JDJ
#LINETHEMUP
Cavalry
.308 Win
I dont see what hes worried about... Isn't the 2nd amendment all about protecting the National Guard and hunting?
Well, in a weird sort of way, he is 100% correct.
Any and all amendments can be changed, added and removed.
This is allowed by our Constitution
Any and all amendments can be changed, added and removed.
This is allowed by our Constitution
Deplorable Me
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Silly kingdom peasants, laws are only for little people.
2WheelGnnr
6.5 Creedmoor
but its ok when they are protecting him the People hes "looking out for"
that is Absolute in him senile mind!!! save me first!!!
that is Absolute in him senile mind!!! save me first!!!
Without any doubt ...
Definitely beyond debate ...
This is being SPOON FED to Biden via his admitted frequent association with the past POTUS and supposed Harvard Constitutional Scholar, and Islam supporter, Barack Hussein Obama!!!
There is no way either he, or those within his administration could effectively formulate such an argument. It's a playbook labeled 2016, dusted it off and flipping through the pages so they may be used once again.
Definitely beyond debate ...
This is being SPOON FED to Biden via his admitted frequent association with the past POTUS and supposed Harvard Constitutional Scholar, and Islam supporter, Barack Hussein Obama!!!
There is no way either he, or those within his administration could effectively formulate such an argument. It's a playbook labeled 2016, dusted it off and flipping through the pages so they may be used once again.
So, do all think that the amendments are absolute and cannot be altered, changed or taken away?
Except the bill of rights. The first 10 amendments are the only reason the colonies agreed to be Joined together. They are the rights of the people and the States, any changes to the first 10 would have to come as another amendment requiring ratification by 3/4 of the states. The attempt alone is cause for a constitutional convention. The libs don’t have enough states in play to be certain it would go their way.
Last edited:
Toecutter
.308 Win
Of course they can be changed,it's happened before, it's just not as easy as signing an order, I know you are aware if this. There is good reason a republic is very hesitant and difficult change, it's trying guard against the weakness of democracy.
GOYABEAN
.950 JDJ
Why Do We Do What We Do? | GOA Pennsylvania
Val covers the philosophical underpinning of GOA’ efforts using the Declaration of Independence and how it shapes our “no compromise” agenda. Show notes: Enlist in GOA’s Grassroots Army: https://donate.gunowners.org/join/
pennsylvania.gunowners.org
I do understand the process.
I just find it funny so many are angry that Biden made this comment.
S&W Fan
.450/400 Nitro Ex
That’s because he made the comment based on his incorrect understanding that he can make changes by executive order.
GOYABEAN
.950 JDJ
Congress has the power to enact laws! Executive Orders are not law... There is a huge difference!
Can RIGHTS be affected by "Law" indubitably!!!
But then ... Are they "Rights"...?
Is "scrutiny" as applied, in the question of inalienable RIGHTS, the problem?
Why yes! As demonstrated here where the EXECUTIVE of our Gov't feels he has the power to effectuate RIGHTS by decree, edict, or proclamations! A major and sincere cognitive problem of the Executive, unless being done with a purpose and intent!
Is that purpose and intent, just following the latest exploits by the Progressive agenda?
They just do it and let it play out in the court of public opinion, who cares if it's legal! And even then, let it drag out in the courts and take years to fix because the edicts do their damage as the sheeple fall into compliance!
Is simply amazing the stretches and trampling on the BOR's that occurs these days! Pretty much rendering it meaningless as if we dismiss the Fed bastardization of those Rights, the States refusing to follow SCOTUS rulings signify much of the same.
So we are back to the same thing again and again...
Scrutiny of Rights!
The SCOTUS having No Teeth!
Regards!
Can RIGHTS be affected by "Law" indubitably!!!
But then ... Are they "Rights"...?
Is "scrutiny" as applied, in the question of inalienable RIGHTS, the problem?
Why yes! As demonstrated here where the EXECUTIVE of our Gov't feels he has the power to effectuate RIGHTS by decree, edict, or proclamations! A major and sincere cognitive problem of the Executive, unless being done with a purpose and intent!
Is that purpose and intent, just following the latest exploits by the Progressive agenda?
They just do it and let it play out in the court of public opinion, who cares if it's legal! And even then, let it drag out in the courts and take years to fix because the edicts do their damage as the sheeple fall into compliance!
Is simply amazing the stretches and trampling on the BOR's that occurs these days! Pretty much rendering it meaningless as if we dismiss the Fed bastardization of those Rights, the States refusing to follow SCOTUS rulings signify much of the same.
So we are back to the same thing again and again...
Scrutiny of Rights!
The SCOTUS having No Teeth!
Regards!
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
3 things I am sure of that's absolute.
1. Death.
2. Taxes.
3. Biden is a piece of shit with dementia.
1. Death.
2. Taxes.
3. Biden is a piece of shit with dementia.
libertysnake
.338 Win Mag
Never forget that the government derives its power from the people. Direct actions or no direct actions, if enough people stand shoulder to shoulder and say "This is not our will." then it is the will of the people. We are the ones with the power, and the numbers.
The path to reform lies in organizing, dialogue, and the boldness to speak ones mind. We have sat back for too long and merely hoped for a better country instead of building one.
The path to reform lies in organizing, dialogue, and the boldness to speak ones mind. We have sat back for too long and merely hoped for a better country instead of building one.
fnfalguy
.308 Win
I wonder if someone should explain this to those affected by the 13th and 19th amendments...
Depick
.308 Win
Hate to say it but he’s somewhat right.
Prohibition
Prohibition
Paxal
.223 Rem
They really do think people are idiots. Using the argument that “you can’t shout fire in a crowded theater” as the basis for his illegal impingments on the 2nd Amendment is a false equivalency. Shouting “fire” demonstrates your malovelant intentions. You are actively promoting mayhem. Owning a firearm is passive - the is no demonstrated bad intent. But, people lap this drival up without even questioning it. Sickening.
Robin
.475 A&M Magnum
Pelosi agrees!
Robin
Robin