nypost.com
Are you even pro-gun? It's amazing how you will justify the actions of a tyrannical nanny-state and chalk this up as little more than, "Well he should have licked the boot. He knew better."
Did you read or understand my post?
If you have to get a permit, then someone can say 'no', and if that's the case then it isn't a right, or at least it's not being treated as one.
So in your scenario, let's imagine he just continues on without a permit.
Well you have to obey the laws on the books.
You would not have made it very far during the revolutionary war.
Straw man says what?
The discussion at hand is our constitutional right to bear arms. You have repeatedly expressed disdain for any civil disobedience in terms of the constitution and clearly you would polish the boots of any would-be authority.
Again you clearly have not read or understood the discussion. Nobody is saying there should be permits required. That has been debunked by reading and comprehending my posts. I have clearly said the constitution grants the abilities. However, that is not the law of the land here. The story is claiming he lost his permit. That is dishonest. He applied for a different type of permit and did so improperly. He didn’t submit a complete application. He should do so. If denied, then we have what this story is claiming to be and we can move the discussion forward. Did he just think his permit would magically issue itself without applying for it?
Clown with no understanding of what is happening says what?
No. You’re just commenting based on what you think is happening but you didn’t read or didn’t understand what the issue actually is. It’s been said multiple times I think the constitution grants the right to carry a gun. However, that’s not the way it is. You need a permit. You can’t bitch about not having a permit if you didn’t apply for one properly. Why would you think you would magically get a permit if you didn’t submit the required paperwork? A child could understand that. If he wants to carry without a permit, god bless him. If he gets busted he can tell the judge “shall not be infringed”. I don’t think it’s going to work out for him though. He should probably just apply the right way and if he’s denied then we can all be here in agreement that it’s bullshit. As it stands now, that’s not what happened. The headline is misleading. That’s the point.
The law on the books says his right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
Have nothing logical to say on the subject at hand after that huh?
NY laws apply. We can cry and stomp our feet but they still do. As stated he can try it with the judge. I wish him the best.
