Oral arguments in the second from last wens.
https://www.courtlistener.com/audio/61737/libertarian-party-of-erie-v-c/?fbclid=IwAR2HgKsw_Hkqvk-Cmb8iRawBOxTnJgsn9GLjRZXI8Xwe9WuEXFHUOTtAAcg
What a joke.
Basically the strategy for these briefs is to toss everything against the wall and see what sticks. Who knows what a justice will latch onto and if you don't raise it in your brief you can't raise it in your oral arguments.
A win on the commerce clause argument means nothing to us outside of...
That would be very bad. Please don't try that.
This ruling has invalidated no laws. It reverses a dismissal by the district court in Hawaii that refused to even review the merits of the case. It has been remanded back to hawaii for another go in the district court.
U.S. appeals court: Constitution gives right to carry gun in public
Note this is not binding here in the 2nd. But this could very easily go to scotus in the next year or two.
Hawaii will almost certainly ask for a stay while this is appealed en banc. It has very slim chances of surviving...
No, upholding the injunction just means the lower court didn't overstep its bounds. Its not a ruling on the merits of the injunction. Furthermore the lower court has yet to decide on the case.
This particular case is in its infancy.