Search results

Awwwww... what a shame.

He said and the message they were generally making was that, "you can't function in society without ID". I absolutely disagree with that.

Not at all.

Yeah, that was tbe last time I needed ID. It's hardly used anywhere. I can't think of the last time I needed it outside of buying beer occasionally. Freedom of speech is huge. Did anyone ID you to post here? They're off their rocker if they think that "you need ID for everything".

Yeah, i stopped at around 2:20 after Musk said "You cant do anything. You need ID for everything." Really? What the fuck is he talking about? I can't think of the last time I needed an ID outside of maybe buying beer 3 weeks ago. More accurate is you DON'T need ID for almost everything...

I think it's more that it doesn't matter. Nobody out there is saying, "you know, I really hate Trump's position on <taxes/abortion/pick an issue>, but now that he passed me a hamburger through a window he's my guy".

I get meeting people where they are but I don't think this is effective. Hypothetically, let's say Harris had done this and not Trump... would that make you vote for her? OK, she gave out hamburgers and fries. Who cares? That has zero impact on policy, who she will appoint to federal...

Are they here legally or illegally? That's an important detail. I have 0 issue with people who have properly gone through the immigration process. Illegal aliens should all 100% deported tomorrow.

On this week's episode of this not that.. here is what you want.

That's a beaut!

More like Ronald Reagan ditching the fairness doctrine. He paved the way for Clinton's BS. The Fairness Doctrine, enforced by the Federal Communications Council, was rooted in the media world of 1949. Lawmakers became concerned that the monopoly audience control of the three main networks...

So Sinclair is OK but when the other side does the same thing.... then it's bad?

I remember playing doom and similar as a kid. Someone needs to tell these people that the reason to play these games is because they have guns...

Ok, Guatemala it is then! --Juan Deere

Well, for once I agree. They should cut his dick off, just while he's awake with no anesthesia.

That's a retarded take. The attempt was at Trump's golf course. Trump golfs. A lot. At his golf courses. Might as well claim the Home Sec "leaked" that Trump spends time at his home. Yeah, no shit. That's really obvious... he fucking lives there.

Oh does he.... Do I get a free pony too? He has absolutely no way of accomplishing that. He might as well promise it will rain bags of 50s too.

....crackdown on impaired driving for the Labor day weekend, over 20,000 tickets were issued by police.... If that's the goal I'm ok with it. Fuck drunk drivers. In a lot of cases I think tickets are BS, but drunk driving isn't one of the BS items. Party, have a good time, whatever... just...

Next you're going to try to tell me the earth is flat.

Stylistic point scoring *is* more important than the actual record... for people who will be swayed by a debate. Nobody that cares about policy is swayed by debates. These debates aren't for you or me. The candidates are glaringly different. If someone hasn't decided by now and they care...

Ha. No. I just don't believe there is such a thing. A book of ear pictures of famous people... so you can get one just like theirs, though I guess that's possible in this fucked up country. Either way, I'd like to verify the claim.

I'd like a copy of this "collection of ears of famous people".

Debates are never about policy, at least in the last 10 years. 90%+ of people who are going to vote in this election already have their mind made up. No matter who you prefer, to anyone with a pulse the candidates are very different. They get swayed by personality more than policy. Trump...

That might be the factor. Looking like....

I bricked up the back door to my house when I bought it.

Oh I agree he should be handling it better. However I also recognize that they definitely are phrasing the questions in a negative way for him. They might as well be saying: Moderator: President Trump, tell me why you suck. Trump: <gives a frustrated answer> Moderator: Interesting, VP...

I actually agree. Though the moderation seems biased IMO.

He keeps his soap on a string.

"My girlfriend dumped me so I'm going to shoot a bunch of innocent people". What a fucking loser.

There's a lot of lessons in there. Some obvious, some not so much. 1. Kid had a Fkd up life. That's a contributing factor. 2. Parents were dirtbags, also contributed. 3. This story is a good example of why you never talk to the police. Dad is in jail and charged because he talked to them.

Texas is asshole. It wants it's laws to apply outside of its state, which would be horrible precedent. Texas should be careful what they wish for, if this is legit, then are NY laws banning certain firearms being applied in Texas, etc.

Nope, you shouldn't. I'm not saying I agree with her plan (I don't). If you go back through you'd see I'm just saying that the information on it should be posted accurately and not in a misleading manner like in the article.

Yesh, voting no on that shit.

It's not an odd policy at all. For some reason a lot of women don't like him... I think we all know why. He's trying to get votes back.

Just what we need. Low income people who can't afford to support themselves getting IVF so we can all support their kids too. Great idea, Donald Fuck.

Impeachment isn't a criminal proceeding. A criminal trial is. Oh, and the charges aren't fake. They are in fact very real.

Equally bad.

It's been a long time since I got a "fix it" style ticket for something like a headlight out, about 15 years. Back then you had 48 hours to fix it and all you had to do was go to a police station in the jurisdiction, show them the ticket and tell them you had it fixed and the vehicle was there...

To be fair some the these prechecks are basically impossible to do. Like a break light check. How am I supposed to walk around the vehicle and press the break pedal at the same time? Yes you can use reflection off a garage door, but that's only so good, light bleeds over, etc. Also, not...

Headline is wildly misleading. Doesn't apply to primary residence. Has a large cutout exemptions on a half a million in total profit per annum. its not to target average people, It's to target this: https://www.redfin.com/news/investor-home-purchases-q4-2023/

I'm not saying to not "make a stink" about something. I'm saying that making up things that aren't true isn't a good way to make your argument.

You'd pay more taxes this way. A key isn't a primary residence and does not qualify for tax exempt status.

Ie. You're not paying taxes on any of it if it's your main residence. This is mainly targeted at people with 2+ homes, which isn't most people. Her idea is not something I particularly agree with.... however also it's nowhere near the claim that most people selling their home would be paying...

Good. You read it. So what are the primary residence exemptions? This should be an easy one for you.

So you just copied an article headline, put it in the thread title, and didn't bother to see if the article is accurate? Granted it's not like you can fully reasearch every nuanced detail, but the headline is way off.

Who is "they"? Your master? Did "they" fill in the thread title box or did you?

How does her proposal work? I know, do you? Not saying I agree with her idea, but your headline is wildly inaccurate.

Only commented on him due to the thread. That being said I'd have a different description of her, but it would be as equally unflattering.

Donald Trump is what you get when delusions of grandeur intersect with low grade mediocrity.