Search results

Of course. Why facilitate the cart you put before the horse?

A contact in CA mentioned 6 months ago they had transitioned to electrical billing according to tax bracket; No, not usage.

Oh you mean a storage and distribution grid. Last major power station built in 1975 you say……. and you wonder why DOW is going with small nuclear plants to provide reliable power you say….. Build Back Better has done so much to solidify, improve, and strengthen our civil infrastructure.

AND these taxes are paying for PRIVATE companies to set up solar farms, get the revenue AND at least Northern NY doesn’t even get the power; goes way south. BUT we lose the farm land.

https://www.senate.gov/about/powers-procedures/filibusters-cloture/overview.htm

…and your mom only “loses” if she HAS to sell during a low period.

Privatized Socialism Ok, this will be long winded. So if you need a short something to rant on, this may not be it, keep scrolling. This is a read a couple times, chew between each read. What if I told you we’ve been living within a Privatized Socialist system for some time? For the purposes...

Not really a new law. How it is being applied has changed in several areas. DV with Extreme (Threat of violence) has always held the temporary removal of fire arms. This is in place if the victim has been threatened with injury or death. The issue I have seen recently is it is being applied...

It is a great deep carry. I have one in 38+P. Range gun it is not. One or two cylinders is ok. After that the Airweight part comes clear. Great deep carry and defense gun.

It’s lever/ manual. Threaded is “allowed”. It’s only a concern in scary semiauto

Exception also applies to first responders

Time for a bucket of popcorn. Folks who pay taxes and work gotta be getting ready for change. Though I bet it gets struck down after a long waiting line through the courts.

Just to make sure, it is the envelope circled in red right upper of the page. There is a few in our conversation

I messaged you.

Bump: message sent

DM sent

So, are they submitting that there is a mental defect BECAUSE he’ trans? THAT would be interesting case law.

That was my question (and is every time I hear Universal Background). My assumption is they are applying it to private sales but it didn’t read that way. Or their adopting the Nys technique of redundancy.

DM sent

Nys additional restriction of Government and municipal comes to mind

And FOPA of 1983 willful violation of law