Curious what any of this has to do with this situation?
Absolutely zero. Deflection and the apologetics machine warming up.
Curious what any of this has to do with this situation?
Yes. after zimmerman and ferguson I've stopped making conclusions from these videos, because in the vast majority of cases there is a lot more going on than some bloodthirsty KKK member looking to kill black people. The media prefers the latter message, because promoting the idea that the US is still basically 1840 most whites are akin to cotton estate owners is a simpler message.I don’t know, I always question these stories nowadays. Zimmerman was proven to have been justified, so was the cop in Ferguson, etc. 99% of the time these innocent Rhodes scholars are committing a crime and are violent felons. I will admit the video looks damning but whenever a white person gets recorded shooting a black person it’s sensationalized by the media.
Makes sense. if this guy was in fact scouting homes to rob, a cop would have attempted to stop him as these guys would have and, had the altercation happened, the cop would have been let go for certain. I suppose the difference here is did these guys have any legal justification to attempt to forcibly restrain this guy? I'm guessing no, in which case they're probably pretty screwed.There was a struggle over the gun. Both men were in fear for their lives at that point. However, you cant rob someone's house and kill the owner because he pulled a gun and then claim self defense either. On the other hand, A police officer would be fully justified if he killed someone in a struggle over his gun . The courts have to decide if these men were acting in a law enforcement capacity or not. Pretty tough to prove.
I could see the courts reducing the charge from Homicide to negligent homicide, much easier to prove .
Disclaimer. the men were idiots .
Same with the media and the families lawyers. The truth always lies somewhere in between in most cases. Cops can only present the facts as they were told or investigated in most cases unless they were physically present there.Your job is relevant. It's been demonstrated repeatedly that cops will suppress, distort or create evidence which blocks the actual facts from coming to light in everything from murder and drug cases to simple traffic stops. Innumerable examples can be found. Some communities find themselves dealing with this reality constantly. What to do when the justice system is untrustworthy?
Prior convictions (multiple) show a pattern. Does it mean he was scoping out a target? No. Does it mean he should have been killed? No. Does it mean he was more likely to be out for more than a jog? I would say yes compared to someone who’s never been convicted of a felony. Crime statistics show all races are more likely to be repeat offenders than those who have ever committed a felony. It’s common sense but won’t be allowed in court most likely. I think these two should be convicted on the evidence I have seen so far even if he was looking in houses as some have reported .Absolutely zero. Deflection and the apologetics machine warming up.
From the media and the law expert this morning they said in Georgia you can make a citizens arrest of a person if you see them commit a felony.No. legally they can detain him until police arrive. Not advisable , But not against the law either. Was the guy doing something wrong? Don't know. Was it even the same guy? Don't know. Im curious as to what their defense might be. If these were drunk Klansmen out hunting,then its first degree homicide , hands down . If its anything else the charges may be reduced and the reaction could start a fire storm .
Do you know what burglary is? The murder victim was outside in the street.Sounds correct. I was thinking burglary
Do you know for sure?regardless of what his intentions were, no crime was committed.
The encounter was caught on camera, we’ll see once the video is released, but from everything I’ve seen regarding this, no crime was committed except by the neighborhood watchDo you know for sure?
What's more likely: That he committed some crime--or these guys thought he did--and they played vigilante and things got out of hand
or
This guy was going out for a jog and they decided to kill him because he's black and had no business jogging.
That's because you only saw the video.The encounter was caught on camera, we’ll see once the video is released, but from everything I’ve seen regarding this, no crime was committed except by the neighborhood watch
Do you know what burglary is? The murder victim was outside in the street.
Yep, just warming up, the race baiting big media was in gear from the get go. They got a lot of catching up to do. There is truth and facts in there somewhere, just where 'there' is has yet to be determined.Absolutely zero. Deflection and the apologetics machine warming up.
Are you really that insulated? Wow.That's because you only saw the video.
I am just saying I find it extremely unlikely that these guys were simply driving around, saw a black guy jogging, and decided to what exactly? Nobody has explained why they decided to stop a black guy jogging. They didn't go out and shoot him immediately. They tried to stop him. For what? Jogging? Were they going to arrest him for jogging? kidnap him? Have a word with him? Why did they target him?
Me, insulated? So you are taking the position that these crackers were out negro-hunting? Just saw a black guy going for a jog and decided it was time to rack the scatter gun and teach him a lesson? And you say this even when i actually posted a link that has a transcript of the 911 call which explained the situation underpinning their motivation? The post you call insulated with a wow response I posted an actual link justifying and confirming precisely what I had at that point only guessed at.Are you really that insulated? Wow.
Me, insulated? So you are taking the position that these crackers were out negro-hunting? Just saw a black guy going for a jog and decided it was time to rack the scatter gun and teach him a lesson? And you say this even when i actually posted a link that has a transcript of the 911 call which explained the situation underpinning their motivation? The post you call insulated with a wow response I posted an actual link justifying and confirming precisely what I had at that point only guessed at.
Do you realize how many times the cops have been called either on me, or other Black folks I know, simply for entering into public spaces that white folks have decided are their own personal fiefdoms?
Jogging/walking/driving etc. while Black is a legitimate hazard.
"They tried to stop him. For what? Jogging? Were they going to arrest him for jogging? kidnap him? Have a word with him? Why did they target him?"
Do you realize how many times the cops have been called either on me, or other Black folks I know, simply for entering into public spaces that white folks have decided are their own personal fiefdoms? That these two individuals would take "the law" into their own hands is simply an extension of the attitude that the "Karens" of this country have.