spat
.700 Nitro Express
Irrelevant if you can’t win.Sure beats catering to your constituents and selling out your values to secure re-election.
Irrelevant if you can’t win.Sure beats catering to your constituents and selling out your values to secure re-election.
Sure beats catering to your constituents and selling out your values to secure re-election.
You are kidding right?"A google search may interest you."
Says the guy with the spelling errors.
But yeah, we should all listen to you over the guy who's been an active member of the party for 15 years...
The Libertarian party neither wants or needs votes from the binary thinkers. There are way too many eligible voters who are in line with the platform than not.
I dont even use autocorrect....its all me.@Criticalt well that argument should shut you up! Your autocorrect failed like @drowhawk ’s argument.
Well, in fairness libertarianism in principle has elements of both the left and the right.You are kidding right?
Did you look around?
Your knowledge of the Libertarian party is wrong....period.
Libertarianism goes from far left to far right. This is well known by most people.
This is day one stuff here.
Left-libertarianism - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
My point is that so many people believe libertarianism to be far right or at least right of conservatism.Well, in fairness libertarianism in principle has elements of both the left and the right.
The fact that libertarianism is now seen as "right wing" is just evidence of how far the whole country has slipped to the left.
On an absolute sense libertarianism would be a good definition for the center.
That doesn’t mean they're wrong.
I'm making a few assumptions here, so if I'm wrong please correct me.If Cumho and Diblasio stick to their anti-Orthodox Jew crusade, NY can definitely be in play. Those guys a) vote as told, b) are expert level scammers, c) don't like to lose.
I'm making a few assumptions here, so if I'm wrong please correct me.
Assumption 1- Orthodox vote democrat
Assumption 2- (based on post) they are told to vote Democrat
This is where I'm a bit lost. Where is the messaging telling them to not vote Democrat? Honest question
So your stance on immigration truly is open boarders? I just can’t see how anyone could support that. We have to know and control who’s in our country. If not all is lost.The problem is, how does one balance things like abortion and immigration (where I can get pretty lefty) vs. having a short-term handy tool against woke assholes? There’s no balance there in any mainstream party, no nuance or acknowledgement that 330+mn people come in 330+mn shades and perhaps a significant number of them don’t take a shine to the packages the Demicans and Republicrats put forth. There’s certainly no shame about the fortresses they’ve jointly put around themselves with regards to debates.
Gun to my head, between Triden and Bump, I’d pick orange hair, but good god. Why would I actually want to perpetuate sleazy old parties?
Too bad Jo sucks.
My shit bag union supports the democrats too and they fuck them and is workers every chance they get. My union asked if I wanted some asshole democrats sign and I never responded. Guess what showed up one day stuck in my lawn on the city property in front of my house. I was backing out to go some where and noticed it sitting there. I stopped traffic to toss it in my trunk. It will get bullet holes tomorrow.It basically comes down to the rabbi. In ultra orthodox hasidism the religious authorities are revered and call the shots even when it comes to voting. On State level politics they have tended to vote Democrat. The Dems cater to them because they get a good block vote out of it
I'm making a few assumptions here, so if I'm wrong please correct me.
Assumption 1- Orthodox vote democrat
Assumption 2- (based on post) they are told to vote Democrat
This is where I'm a bit lost. Where is the messaging telling them to not vote Democrat? Honest question
Haha. The far or radical center, but yes, I agree.Well, in fairness libertarianism in principle has elements of both the left and the right.
The fact that libertarianism is now seen as "right wing" is just evidence of how far the whole country has slipped to the left.
On an absolute sense libertarianism would be a good definition for the center.
So your stance on immigration truly is open boarders? I just can’t see how anyone could support that. We have to know and control who’s in our country. If not all is lost.
It's sad, but this forum is very slow to come to grips with reality.It baffles me how many people on this forum are willing to vote for the most anti-gun president we've had since Clinton (Trump) and then point the finger at people like us that are voting with the pro-2A candidate. ON A PRO-2A FORUM! LOL some of you have been drinking too much kool-aid.
"But the Republicans will SLOWLY take away our gun rights. The Democrats will take them away immediately."
Republicans had their chance with me when they could've voted on 50 state reciprocity. That ship has long since sailed.
I'm voting #Jo2020
No, I wouldn’t say that. I think it’s a goal to aspire to, but the human condition right now won’t allow that. Open borders is either 100 generations away, or will need some aliens to land before it’s any kind of a workable or practical thought. I’m absolutely for border controls and a good steady method for who can be here and who can’t.
My frustration is exemplified by what you said: that I’m for open borders. Being more lax on immigration doesn’t instantly translate to open borders. There aren’t just two poles on this or any subject, there’s a lot of nuance in between.
Next they will promise a wall on the southern border AND Mexico will pay for it!You got fo be kidding.
Dimwit Jo's Libertarian VP running mate has trolled their potential voters by promising "free cheesy bread and Waffle Houses on every corner." He also pledged "to fund time-travel research and then go back to kill Baby Adolf Hitler with a pledge to kill Baby Woodrow Wilson, too."
He is not a serious candidate and is in fact a joke whose trolling antics are an embarrassment for any serious political party. He loathes Libertarians and openly self identifies as an anarchist.
Not gonna waste my vote on that clown show when there are better clowns.
There's already laws, procedures, guidelines and the freedom to do it the legal way in place right now. JUST. OBEY. THE. LAW. Nobody is saying we should lock down the borders and prohibit anyone from immigrating to the USA.
Yup, and I don’t have a problem with that. Where I do have a problem is in the assumption that immigrants are troublemakers. I’m not sure how to explain where I am, but I am perfectly OK with border controls, just not if they are enforced with the basic mindset that immigrants = bad.
What if the laws are awful and wrong?I don't think most people are saying immigrants are bad. Obviously some will say that. However, those that don't follow the letter of the law to enter legally are already executing a criminal act. So not doing it the right way puts them in the category of criminal right off the bat.
Again.....JUST. FOLLOW. THE. LAW.
I don't think most people are saying immigrants are bad. Obviously some will say that. However, those that don't follow the letter of the law to enter legally are already executing a criminal act. So not doing it the right way puts them in the category of criminal right off the bat.
Again.....JUST. FOLLOW. THE. LAW.
Beyond BLM support, which I doubt, that's a huge yes to all the others.
It's probably not, and it sticks out because I fully agree with the other stuff.Hey I mean, since I get negged for not overlooking a few things the Republicans do...why this?
In all honesty, I’m so disconnected from the pulse of politics that I don’t even know if BLM is a libertarian thing. I hope not.
Well here’s the thing that the right here doesn’t grasp: they have sounded xenophobic for a long time, arguing about how our culture will change, or most pointedly how our President campaigned on what kind of dregs we’re importing. If that’s not what Republicans mean to say, then they need to sort out that messaging. I don’t think it’s a policy problem, or if it is, it’s not the main thing.
Well, sacrificing our culture is a problem.Well here’s the thing that the right here doesn’t grasp: they have sounded xenophobic for a long time, arguing about how our culture will change, or most pointedly how our President campaigned on what kind of dregs we’re importing. If that’s not what Republicans mean to say, then they need to sort out that messaging. I don’t think it’s a policy problem, or if it is, it’s not the main thing.
You're misquoting what President Trump said on his campaign trail. He didn't say we're importing dregs from other countries. He said with open borders we're also welcoming the dregs of society without resistance. If everyone follows the immigration laws those who are entering with nefarious intent can be vetted before entering as opposed to them already being here, breaking additional laws and only catching them when they do get caught.