Article Of Impeachment Against Trump To Be Introduced Monday In House
- Thread starter livingston
- Start date
drowhawk
.44 mag
Pentagon to resume briefings for Biden transition team after ‘irresponsible’ delays, report says
Mr Biden’s incoming national security advisor said the president-elect’s team was being kept in the dark about national security issues such as a massive cyberattack on government agencies last month
www.independent.co.uk
Harris likely hasn't given up her seat because she wouldn't get a paycheck for two weeks...
This forum should start selling NYGF tin foil hats...
MothMan
.338 Win Mag
it don't mean nothin
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
Actually they should be lined up and shot for treason.
Phazer
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Oh, I know that.
It's just fun to watch a constitutionalist speak in the U.S. congress once in awhile. Jordan and Gomert also did well.
Phazer
.450/400 Nitro Ex
McConnell Rejects Emergency Session for Impeachment Trial
If the House impeaches President Donald Trump, a Senate trial on the charge seems all but certain to have to wait until President-elect Joe Biden is inaugurated.
www.newsmax.com
According to The Hill, McConnell said in a memo to colleagues last week that the Senate would not be able to handle any business on the floor before that date unless all 100 senators agreed to reconvene sooner.
As a result, the memo continued, an impeachment trial could not beging until 1 p.m. on Jan. 20, after Biden's swearing in.
So...we're going through this exercise just so the Dems can virtue signal that they hate Trump to the very end? Didn't we already know that?
I hope that the Dems press to have an impeachment trial after Trump leaves office. The Republicans can object on the grounds that you cannot have a trial to remove an official from office when they're already out of office. Can't wait to see how the SCOTUS rules on that.
Catskillkid
.450/400 Nitro Ex
McConnell Rejects Emergency Session for Impeachment Trial
If the House impeaches President Donald Trump, a Senate trial on the charge seems all but certain to have to wait until President-elect Joe Biden is inaugurated.
According to The Hill, McConnell said in a memo to colleagues last week that the Senate would not be able to handle any business on the floor before that date unless all 100 senators agreed to reconvene sooner.As a result, the memo continued, an impeachment trial could not beging until 1 p.m. on Jan. 20, after Biden's swearing in.
So...we're going through this exercise just so the Dems can virtue signal that they hate Trump to the very end? Didn't we already know that?
I hope that the Dems press to have an impeachment trial after Trump leaves office. The Republicans can object on the grounds that you cannot have a trial to remove an official from office when they're already out of office. Can't wait to see how the SCOTUS rules on that.
They can still impeach after he leaves office. It ensures he can never run for office again. That's their goal.
Phazer
.450/400 Nitro Ex
That's a point of contention. It may not be constitutional to have a trial for him after he leaves office.
That may be the plan..
How does that stop them? It doesn't. They can operate however they please. Nobody can stop it.
BDinPutnam
.475 A&M Magnum
It's entirely constitutional to do so.
Robin
.577 Tyrannosaur.
How is that possible? Then they can impeach anyone? i don't think so. I also think, based on actual events of at least the last four years, They don't care and can act with impunity, who will stop them, no one. Hey Nancy you hateful whore, impeach me, ugly personified.
Robin
Robin
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Let the hate begin! Let the haters revel and lavish themselves with their gossamer abomination of self loathing.
Robin
Robin
1075tech
.338 Win Mag
Since when did the constitution ever stop them?
Briefings resumed.Pentagon to resume briefings for Biden transition team after ‘irresponsible’ delays, report says
Mr Biden’s incoming national security advisor said the president-elect’s team was being kept in the dark about national security issues such as a massive cyberattack on government agencies last month
Harris likely hasn't given up her seat because she wouldn't get a paycheck for two weeks...
This forum should start selling NYGF tin foil hats...
She actually would get paid. Maybe you should read a bit. Seriously, you seem to be wrong, incorrect and mistaken a fair amount.
Google is easy.
drowhawk
.44 mag
Oh okay so she should get some paid time off on behalf of the government then. Got it. There's an equally "rational democrat" to replace her, don't worry.
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
Steal2B
.700 Nitro Express
BDinPutnam
.475 A&M Magnum
In 1876, the House impeached ex-Secretary of War William Belknap after he resigned from office over a corruption scandal. What is more, as the legal scholar Brian C. Kalt notes in his exhaustive study, "The Constitutional Case for the Impeachability of Former Federal Officials," "the House unanimously voted and the Senate ruled specifically that resignation could not terminate the congressional impeachment process."
Yes, the Senate May Hold Trump’s Impeachment Trial After He Leaves Office
Writing in The Washington Post, Judge J. Michael Luttig, a Republican appointee who sat on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit from 1991 to
reason.com
The Constitutional Case for the Impeachability of Former Federal Officials: An Analysis of the Law, History, and Practice of Late Impeachment
This article considers the constitutional case for the impeachability of federal officers after they have left office. As a practical matter, while it may rarel
papers.ssrn.com
kev74
20×102mm Vulcan
At 11:59 am, Trump should rip ass in a manor that would make Swallow-well blush, shrug his shoulders and say "Pardon me."
Then mic drop.
Then mic drop.
byron
.308 Win
Yes, the Senate May Hold Trump’s Impeachment Trial After He Leaves Office
Writing in The Washington Post, Judge J. Michael Luttig, a Republican appointee who sat on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit from 1991 to
reason.com
guess he better learn to read because if I read this right what I found about the case it is NOT president.
Belknap's case was constitutionally unprecedented and would serve as reference for nine other civilian officials' resignations before trial, including President Richard Nixon
they are also leaving out that he was acquitted
the Senate voted 35 to 25 to convict Belknap, with one Senator not voting, thus acquitting Belknap of all charges by failing to reach the required two-thirds majority.[3][88][90] All Senators agreed that Belknap took the money from Marsh, but 23 who voted for acquittal believed that the Senate did not have jurisdiction.
HOGWASH....... so we can go back in time and impeach any past president, no way that will fly.
Steal2B
.700 Nitro Express
It is NOT constitutional, for the whole purpose of it is to remove a president from office, if he is not in office it is over.
Rational? welcome to blockville, done with your foolish drivel!
The who's who of nobodies.....
Yes you can. If you don't think so then tell that to William Belknap.
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
And, traitors.