gun_slinger_boy
.338 Win Mag
Why would you 3D print a brace? You may as well just get a real stock at that point.3d printer files for braces will be released soon i bet lol .
Why would you 3D print a brace? You may as well just get a real stock at that point.3d printer files for braces will be released soon i bet lol .
Why would you 3D print a brace? You may as well just get a real stock at that point.
because you could .. and defeat there RULES ... then they would have to ban Velcro and straps lol ..
Wouldn't you be "defeating the rules" by getting an actual stock? I just don't see why you would go through the trouble of printing an inferior brace rather than just getting a stock. The brace would be just as illegal as a stock on a short barrel rifle with no stamp. It would be akin to printing out a bump stock when you could just drill the third hole. If you're gonna break the law do it right.because you could .. and defeat there RULES ... then they would have to ban Velcro and straps lol ..
Those will soon be banned too, the printer.3d printer files for braces will be released soon i bet lol .
Since a brace is going to be considered a stock, “Others” will be SBR according to the law.so if this goes into affect tomorrow...how will this be enforced? What does that mean for “others”?
Are they going to do the same as they did with p80’s?
Those will soon be banned too, the printer.
Haha printer and cnc machine to brrrtthey tried and failed .. ban the printer .. ban the cnc machine .. there goes the auto industry .
Don't care.ATF to Institute Rulemaking/Guidance Regarding Stabilizing Braces and Require Registration of Currently Owned Braces
In a 16 page draft copy of proposed rulemaking/guidance specifying “Objective Factors for Classifying Stablizing Braces”, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) h…blog.princelaw.com
Oh well.Since a brace is going to be considered a stock, “Others” will be SBR according to the law.
This is a serious matter. Obviously banning braces will reduce crime by at least 50%. /sOh well.
"Importantly, the draft document recognizes that most people with braced firearms have acted in good faith. It suggests that the agency seeks to establish a procedure by which people who already have firearms that may fall under the purview of the NFA, and who wish to take advantage of registering them as NFA firearms to obtain the legal protections of such, may potentially do so without payment of the associated tax."BREAKING: ATF to Issue Guidance on “Stabilizing Braces”
FPC believes that the NFA is an unconstitutional infringement of the People’s rights, that the ATF should be abolished, and that any policy or practice enforcing the Act is unconstitutional and immoral.www.firearmspolicy.org
this article has a good breakdown
Hmm how can one obtain these free tax stamp. Asking for a friend and Cuomo."Importantly, the draft document recognizes that most people with braced firearms have acted in good faith. It suggests that the agency seeks to establish a procedure by which people who already have firearms that may fall under the purview of the NFA, and who wish to take advantage of registering them as NFA firearms to obtain the legal protections of such, may potentially do so without payment of the associated tax."
Yeah, sure, where do I sign up, if I had one that is.
Once the Dems control everything sure.ATF Please add in all this for Voting too
Sounds like the ATF needs to come forward and publicly say something because if the SBA3 is in fact not a brace then that means that almost every AR-15 manufacturer has been making illegal SBRs for at least 2 years now and the ATF hasn't said a word to the public at all. The only way we found out is through a fucking FOIA request.
It really sounds like the federal government is begging for a lawsuit challenging the legal authority of the ATF.
What does it mean for my AR pistol. The hardware kit came with a brace, I tried it and didn't like it, so it sits in a box on a shelf now.so if this goes into affect tomorrow...how will this be enforced? What does that mean for “others”?
Are they going to do the same as they did with p80’s?
From a legal perspective, whatever they say goes. It’s up to the people to comply or not and to know the ramifications of their decisions.Realistically, if the ATF determines something is non-compliant, what happens?
It sounds like the most likely scenario, assuming they don't back down, is they give a grace period to convert or register?
From the legal
From a legal perspective, whatever they say goes. It’s up to the people to comply or not and to know the ramifications of their decisions.
Everything right now is still tentative and has not been officially put into effect. If anything does become enforceable by the ATF, there will have to be some sort of guidelines to know what you are supposed to adhere by, Though in true ATF fashion it will most likely be vague and need clarification on numerous occasions.So the option is basically convert ASAP from a legal perspective, as soon as told otherwise?
Is there any comparable determination to reference for procedure?
And just how are they "legally protected"?...advantage of registering them as NFA firearms to obtain the legal protections of such...
They take a look at the list of those that registered to be "legally protected", then they "legally" take them. By force if necessary.Realistically, if the ATF determines something is non-compliant, what happens?
A really good copy of the shockwave has been out for awhile. But at that point like others have mentioned its pointless, put on a stock.3d printer files for braces will be released soon i bet lol .
Biden Administration (read: Anti-American, totalitarian, Deep State money men): "Challenge accepted. We'll regulate ALL firearm parts. By the time we're done, you'll need to be fingerprinted and pay for a permit just to add grip tape to a pistol."A $200 3D printer and unregulated parts are all that stands between people and a fully functional gun. As it should be.