Also
ATF arbitrarily reclassified some pistols as SBR
- Thread starter Edwardteach72
- Start date
spat
.950 JDJ
And shoot your dog
Good interview with the owner of SB Tactical and creator of the first stabilizing brace
Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
here is another ..
I started this one but need to sit down and finish it
BDinPutnam
.475 A&M Magnum
As ive said before, im not really into MSRs or these types of guns but if you find somewhere to donate money to fight this, let us know, ill pitch in a couple bills.
spat
.950 JDJ
Democrat presidential candidates.
I will say that I’m not so sure about Kevin Brittingham as having limited resources. Previously owned AAC (sold it for $18 million), also received a large payout from Remington, then worked at Sig Sauer, and now owns Q. Kevin has some money! If you ever watch his live feeds on Instagram you can see what looks like a football field sized pool behind his hot tub lol.
Oh he has money.. no doubt about that..
But he doesn't have HK, FN. BCM, Sig, PSA money
nortatoga
.338 Win Mag
WH Investigating ATF Decision to Increase Regulation on Certain Pistols
www.breitbart.com
WH Investigating ATF Move to Increase Regulation on Certain Pistols
The White House is investigating the ATF's decision to increase regulation on Q, LLC's (Q) Honey Badger Pistol.
www.breitbart.com
GOYABEAN
.950 JDJ
Tell Trump to Reverse ATF’s Reclassification of Honey Badger Pistol | GOA
ATF Goes Rogue Once Again! Once again, gun owners, manufacturers, and dealers are subject to the whims of the anti-gun bureaucrats who run the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF). The latest outrage is that they have reclassified Q, LLC’s Honey Badger Pistol as a Short...
gunowners.org
libertysnake
.338 Win Mag
WH Investigating ATF Decision to Increase Regulation on Certain Pistols
WH Investigating ATF Move to Increase Regulation on Certain Pistols
The White House is investigating the ATF's decision to increase regulation on Q, LLC's (Q) Honey Badger Pistol.
If he manages to reverse it, then he comes out on top.
I do like how Kevin from Q is backing his customers as much as possible. Any owner of their Honey Badger pistol now has an SBR. So to legally own it now (if they’re able to in their state) is to file a Form 1 which includes the cost of the $200 tax stamp. Q will reimburse the owner the $200...so that’s cool. Shouldn’t have to do it since the ATF is crap, but it’s nice that the company will help their customers out.
1075tech
.338 Win Mag
So do I need to take the SBA3 off my pistol? In a free state, I could add a VFG and make it an "other" as it's over 26".
There’s nothing strictly aimed at the SBA3 currently. All braces are fine right now. The only thing that the ATF has made a decision on is specifically aimed at the Honey Badger pistol.
spat
.950 JDJ
The fact that the ATF changes it's mind on these *should* be enough to get the whole statute thrown out as unconstitutionally vague.
It isn’t, but it should be.
" in general, a statute might be called void for vagueness reasons when an average citizen cannot generally determine what persons are regulated, what conduct is prohibited, or what punishment may be imposed. "
en.m.wikipedia.org
If even the federal agency tasked with enforcing it can't decide whether something is prohibited or not, what chance do average citizens have ?
It isn’t, but it should be.
" in general, a statute might be called void for vagueness reasons when an average citizen cannot generally determine what persons are regulated, what conduct is prohibited, or what punishment may be imposed. "
Vagueness doctrine - Wikipedia
If even the federal agency tasked with enforcing it can't decide whether something is prohibited or not, what chance do average citizens have ?
I am going to give him credit where credit is due. He really is actually trying instead of being a dbag
1075tech
.338 Win Mag
True. Until they decide that the SBA 3 on the shit weasel makes it an SBR. Also in the ATF letter, they said they were taking the "holistic" approach, taking into consideration magazine capacity, optics, weight, etc.
But they also said they won't be able to rule on the brace itself.
There fore an sba3 may be kosher on pistol a,y, & f. But turn pistols b,q,r, and j into SBRs
1075tech
.338 Win Mag
They'll know it when they see it
Thats exactly what they are saying..
Aka they can't actually go after the braces and therefore they are using this (my speculation) as a test run to try and go after pistols
GOYABEAN
.950 JDJ
political move because of elections in the hope's it harm's POTUS and always go after the little guy in the pond mentality 
If ATF rules that the Sugar Weasel is an SBR, than the issue is the Sugar Weasel as a whole and not because of its individual parts (depending on how they word their ruling). The issue will then come when all the people with SBA3’s send letters to the ATF asking since the Sugar Weasel is an SBR, does that mean the SBA3 is no longer a legal option for a pistol. People are their own worst enemy and open up themselves to problems. This is exactly what happened when some idiot sent a letter to the ATF for clarification regarding vertical foregrips on pistols with folding adapters.
Or the first time they changed their minds on shouldering a brace even with a letter saying its ok people still had to call and write in droves asking if it was ok
Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan