Looks like the ATF is planning to reclassify AR and AK pistols INCLUDING ones WITHOUT a brace as an AOw under the NFA
Last edited:
I’m guessing we would need to get a tax stamp for it, so I guess I could then change the brace to a stock, but I don’t think NY allows SBR..I don't personally own one of these, but what is the most likely course of action? They give people a grace period to comply?
I’m guessing we would need to get a tax stamp for it, so I guess I could then change the brace to a stock, but I don’t think NY allows SBR..
so I guess I’ll just go boating with it
Wouldn't the normal course of action be to just remove the upper and lower, and sell or at least temp give it to an FFL? That way you only own a lower, and can reclaim the upper when this shit passes. Probably the 100% safest option.
See if your FFL will buy the upper from you and let you buy it back later when we have more info, I guess? I'd check with them if that seems "OK" to do here.
hmm. I could just remove the upper and put on a 16 inch upper and be done with it, but I guessI’d have to get it removed from my permit. The upper I can just keep when it blows over, since no laws states you can’t own an upper.
Will probably not survive an ex-post-facto court challenge.
How so? They declared they were not SBR and they were legal pistols. They reclassify to something not legal to own without a tax stamp. That would be Ex post facto would it not?Ex post facto has nothing to do with it. But I generally agree it wouldn't hold up I dont think. But who's going to sue, NRA?
EtA: Would be an interesting conundrum as I think about it.
New York state has given it the official imprimatur of "pistol" or they wouldnt put it on a permit...
How so? They declared they were not SBR and they were legal pistols. They reclassify to something not legal to own without a tax stamp. That would be Ex post facto would it not?
Just solder on a sufficiently long thread protector.hmm. I could just remove the upper and put on a 16 inch upper and be done with it, but I guessI’d have to get it removed from my permit. The upper I can just keep when it blows over, since no laws states you can’t own an upper.
Not ex post facto.How so? They declared they were not SBR and they were legal pistols. They reclassify to something not legal to own without a tax stamp. That would be Ex post facto would it not?
Will probably not survive an ex-post-facto court challenge.
I keep the upper with me since it’s not a firearm under the ATF and the lower is out of state. WTF!As you think about what you want to do with your forearm braces, please take the time to understand what the ATF considers to be constructive possession.
Florida Man Arrested for Constructive Possession of an SBR
I have recently blogged about the issue of constructive possession of NFA firearms in my article NFA and Constructive Possession: Myth or Reality?. On August 27, 2009, Jesus Amador, Jr., was arrest…blog.princelaw.com
Wondering how long it's going to take the state police to contact me and try to confiscate mine.
I wonder if this sticks, would a fixed mag pistol still be considered an aow? Technically they can't try to push them as being an sbr because they were built as "pistols"
Thanks for the education. if they demanded the tax for something that was previously legal I suppose it may have run into the expostfacto realm.It will most likely survive the challenges. This type of thing has happened before with the USAS-12 and Streetsweeper. They were retroactively classified as Destructive Devices. There was a grace period with free registration, then they became illegal if not registered. Also happened with the Akins Accelerator, retroactively classified as an illegal machinegun.
Yeah that was a travesty of justice right there. And the gun industry/ lot of “2A supporters” played a role giving up this sacrificial lamb.Bump stocks are now machine guns. Even if you owned one before they were machine guns
Wait, what? Buying one today.Next up: "others."