Biden Just Said He Wants to Ban Handguns
- Thread starter livingston
- Start date
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
Folks He just laid out the liberals playbook .....He mentioned things only talked about in back rooms behind closed doors ....The push to outlaw auto loading handguns as well as auto loading rifles . It is all the same ... to a liberal... I have said this before .. everyone should own at least one revolver that can be carried CC ....
Good. Rejoice this news.
The more they push, the more that will fight back.
The more that fight back, the quicker we can take back America.
The more they push, the more that will fight back.
The more that fight back, the quicker we can take back America.
Xae289
.223 Rem
As a NYer, you should have multiple revolvers you can carry. They don't call it a NY Reload for nothin.
Come on, man! This bag of bones doesn’t even know what he’s saying. It’s just rambling. He literally cannot finish one complete sentence. I suspect he panicked and blurted out the first thing he could come up with. Most likely something he overheard someone else talking about. I can’t even believe they let him out there. He’s a huge liability and they know it. Do any of you honestly thinkJoe Jr. has any idea what a pistol or 9mm even is?
By the way, have you seen any pictures from this town hall? The guy with 80 million votes couldn’t fill up more than a quarter of the small theater. I can’t wait till this old cocksucker falls down the stairs, again.
By the way, have you seen any pictures from this town hall? The guy with 80 million votes couldn’t fill up more than a quarter of the small theater. I can’t wait till this old cocksucker falls down the stairs, again.
4WHLDRFTN
.308 Win
prob going to ban 1811’s 
He’s going to instruct the AFT to do it.prob going to ban 1811’s
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
But he is senile enough to blurt out the family secrets ,,, That he shouldn't
That’s why I’m surprised they let him go out there.
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
I believe this is the end game. They want to ban them and the new NYC has spoken out about them going after assault riffles and they kill way less than handguns.
You’re a fool if you don’t think they want to ban handguns it’s just taken them until now to publicly speak of it.
Well sure. But Joe Jr. has nothing to do with it. He doesn’t have much to do with anything these days. These aren’t his ideas. All he cares about is when is ice cream time and when is nap time.
Want in one hand and shit in the other. See which one fills up first.
GOYABEAN
.950 JDJ
nortatoga
.338 Win Mag
Yep. Can’t blame Covid either. Tv ratings were just as bad.
Blimey
.450/400 Nitro Ex
I think with the context of that, and knowing how his mind doesn't work terribly well, he is probably referring to semi-auto rifles, even though he did pointlessly slip in 9 mm.
GOYABEAN
.950 JDJ
Wow standing room only
4WHLDRFTN
.308 Win
Wow standing room only
just media
dwa12479
.338 Win Mag
That was a bunch of incoherent rambling, he had no idea what he was saying.
Jmac00
.475 A&M Magnum
and in the 10 years that 'ban ' was in effect, it had ZERO STATISTICAL effect on crime in the U.S.A. It didn't affect crime, up or down, so your "ban" did absolutely nothing to deter crime.............so FUCK YOU
He does not need to legislate. He only needs to have people do it for him and act like he agrees.
He is doing nothing at all. He is only a figurehead, and a bad one at that.
The Party is doing everything.
He is doing nothing at all. He is only a figurehead, and a bad one at that.
The Party is doing everything.
gunpoliticsny
6.5 Creedmoor
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
He just admitted that it is not law abiding Americans that are committing crimes. A point the right has been making for years.
According to the logic of the left, If We ban drugs, drug dealers wont be able to deal drugs anymore ,
According to the logic of the left, If We ban drugs, drug dealers wont be able to deal drugs anymore ,
libertysnake
.338 Win Mag
The reason why this shit continues is because we're having the wrong arguments.
The argument shouldn't be "Well, handguns are reasonable and rifles are reasonable, they're not automatics."
The argument should be "Is the government's behavior trustworthy enough to disarm the American people? Has history shown that the American people do not need to be armed?"
I think the answer is obvious.
The argument shouldn't be "Well, handguns are reasonable and rifles are reasonable, they're not automatics."
The argument should be "Is the government's behavior trustworthy enough to disarm the American people? Has history shown that the American people do not need to be armed?"
I think the answer is obvious.
Yea how many FFL’s aren’t doing background checks as he suggests? I bet the number is between 0 and 2.