No it does not. I support the Constitution! Period.
That does not mean I have to support stupid people.
The driver was an idiot, plain and simple. I do not support the actions of stupid people.
Brooklyn Cops Arrest Man with Antique Firearm Replica - NYPD News
- Thread starter Krakatoa
- Start date
No it does not. I support the Constitution! Period.
That does not mean I have to support stupid people.
The driver was an idiot, plain and simple. I do not support the actions of stupid people.
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
My point is that you can't support or defend it 100 percent if you are for it being violated against someone else you consider to be stupid or for any other reason.
This isn't an attack on you. Just a statement of fact. If anyone is okay with any person being violated their 2A right, then anyone would have to be okay with a 1A right of speech and or religion being violated along with any other violation like denying him a lawyer or giving him a cruel and unusual punishment.
If everyone though like that, then it would be okay for our rights to be violated because we vote red. The Constitution would be meaningless which in my opinion is right about there anyway since people pick and choose which parts they are okay with or who it should apply to or not apply to.
I am not necessarily okay with this idiot being violated...
I just don't support his decisions or his attitudes. I just have no use for many others.
The occupant was an idiot and got himself jammed up.
I just don't support his decisions or his attitudes. I just have no use for many others.
The occupant was an idiot and got himself jammed up.
He caused all of his own problems. He can deal with them himself. I cannot feel bad for all the idiots of the world.
I understand your point by the way.
I understand your point by the way.
Every situation doesn’t have to be decided using rote logic. We’re allowed to choose sides.
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
You'd be surprised. Take that jacket and vest off , He's probably not as out of shape as you think .
People only become "sovereign citizens" (I am assuming you are using this as a catchall phrase for people who like to give LEOs a hard time) because of the extensive amount of corruption and brutality that is endemic in this country/state. Granted, I am not one to act this way because it looks undignified, but police officers have completely brought this upon themselves.
No. Media lies extropolating a very low percentage of bad apples into the whole bunch is what brought this on. That’s why I don’t care.
I know that I’m prepared to kill anyone who hates cops, so I have no reason to be concerned. I ensure that every time I step out of the precinct, I am 100% focused as if a cop hater with a gun and a mission is only seconds away. If someone bests me, than they were the better man that day. Hasn’t happened yet.
I know that I’m prepared to kill anyone who hates cops, so I have no reason to be concerned. I ensure that every time I step out of the precinct, I am 100% focused as if a cop hater with a gun and a mission is only seconds away. If someone bests me, than they were the better man that day. Hasn’t happened yet.
Fyi, I was talking about Soveriegn Citizens. You shouldn’t condescend like that. I mean what I say and don’t speak when I don’t know what I am referring to. If I was talking about all cop haters, I’d have said that.
"Sovereign Citizens" are a byproduct of general police mistrust. I never condescended (have no idea where you got that) or implied that all cop haters are "sovereign citizens."
I got it from here:
I wasn’t using a catchall phrase. I was talking about Sovereign Citizens.
Sovereigns beef isn’t just with the police, arguably it’s not even their #1.
I wasn’t using a catchall phrase. I was talking about Sovereign Citizens.
Sovereigns beef isn’t just with the police, arguably it’s not even their #1.
Actually, the term "Sovereign Citizens" began heavily back in the 70's and had next to nothing to do with the Police. The movement began in regards to taxes in the United States.
Shadow2
6.5 Creedmoor
You have to hate those sovereigns and anyone who questions authority and government overreach, you know the ones who go to court every so often and win. Bundy ranch come to mind. More then a few called them nut jobs ... well they won in court ... Not so fucking crazy i guess.
Bundy may have tried it, but the Judge did not allow it.
My issue with nearly all of the fools that try to use sovereign citizen status is they have little to no idea what it means or why they are using it.
They watch a bunch of other stupid people on Youtube using it and think why the hell not?
My issue with nearly all of the fools that try to use sovereign citizen status is they have little to no idea what it means or why they are using it.
They watch a bunch of other stupid people on Youtube using it and think why the hell not?
Acer-m14
.950 JDJ
I'm just traveling , need a license , tags , insurance to do that .. why do not Amish for there horse n buggie .. its using the road tax free and not cleaning up there horse exhaust when it backfires .. ?? horse power is horse power 
I'm just traveling , need a license , tags , insurance to do that .. why do not Amish for there horse n buggie .. its using the road tax free and not cleaning up there horse exhaust when it backfires .. ?? horse power is horse power
Don't even get me started on the Amish. I have almost as much use and positive thought for the Amish as I do these sovereigns.
Robin
.475 A&M Magnum
I always thought a 'sovereign' was a ruler of royal lineage, but then I always thought a constable was the governor of the sovereigns' castle.
Robin
Robin
twisted
.40 S&W
So it had powder, balls, etc. I didn’t read anything about caps being there. Completely inert without caps. An oversight in reporting?