Again, either you are an anti-gun shill or NRA operative trying to elicit support. Either way go fuck yourself.
Show me my lie?
Why would I try to trick anyone into supporting an anti 2a organization?
Again, either you are an anti-gun shill or NRA operative trying to elicit support. Either way go fuck yourself.
Ok. So who are they? SAF is great with lawsuits, but doesn't do much lobbying.I dont have to, there are already groups out there doing the work,
Ok. So who are they? SAF is great with lawsuits, but doesn't do much lobbying.
GOA is good for a laugh once in a while, but their outreach doesn't go past preaching to the choir. I like Firearm Coalition too, but I think we have more members of this forum than they have. I already support these groups.
What other group should I support? Who's the one that's going to make the difference?
We have one guy here who resorts to insults when he cannot counter facts and another here who ignores points already made about how other organizations cannot grow because the NRA exists.
At least you counter substance with your insults. @Mosinitis just insults with nothing else after he cannot counter a point made.Hey now I usually result to insults and present facts
Ok Bernie. Where else doesn't the free market work? NRA has less than 5% of US gun owners - hardly a monopoly. There's 95% more for other groups to pull from.... and another here who ignores points already made about how other organizations cannot grow because the NRA exists.
And yet, in 1972, a crack commando unit was sent to prison by a military court for a crime they didn't commit. These men promptly escaped from a maximum security stockade to the Los Angeles underground. Today, still wanted by the government, they survive as soldiers of fortune. If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire... the A-Team.
Correct. Not a monopoly since others exist. People like you who support them keep them alive which in turn causes other organizations not to grow and more people thinking that they should just support the biggest. So I guess gun owners have spoken. Keep an anti gun organization alive. Either that or ignorance on what the NRA actually does and doesn’t do.Ok Bernie. Where else doesn't the free market work? NRA has less than 5% of US gun owners - hardly a monopoly. There's 95% more for other groups to pull from.
The only thing keeping other organizations from prospering and growing is their inability to convince people that they provide a valuable enough service to be worth joining.
Most of the gun owners and shooters I know support multiple pro-2A groups. It doesn't have to be one or nothing.
We have one guy here who resorts to insults when he cannot counter facts and another here who ignores points already made about how other organizations cannot grow because the NRA exists.
You still haven’t countered my points Comrad. Tell me how another organization can grow to be the biggest and lead the way in court case challenges if the majority of the money goes to the NRA because of people like you and others thinking that they have the support the biggest.You will never recognize a fact if it fell on your head. Most here know that. Your opinion that other organizations can't grow is just an opinion. Opinion from a simpleton. Yes, I am insulting you, but if the shoe fits west it.
Explain that they didn’t support gun control in the article below if you are able to without insult.The big lie here is calling NRA antigun. They maybe a lot of things, but they are not antigun. I disagree with many of their decisions and stances, but calling them antigun is a lie.
You still haven’t countered my points Comrad. Tell me how another organization can grow to be the biggest and lead the way in court case challenges if the majority of the money goes to the NRA because of people like you and others thinking that they have the support the biggest.
In theory what you say is correct. Sure another organization can overtake the NRA but in real life it doesn’t work that way just like in theory pure communism can work but in real life it doesn’t. Or a mom and pop hardware store can make more profit than the Home Depot down the road. Yes. In theory they can. But fucking reality is a motherfucker.
The big lie here is calling NRA antigun. They maybe a lot of things, but they are not antigun. I disagree with many of their decisions and stances, but calling them antigun is a lie.
This is your opinion. Can you prove it? In the past me and others couldn't convince you of hard facts, what would be the point to argue opinions with someone like you. You know what they say about opinions. They are like assholes, especially yours.
Explain that they didn’t support gun control in the article below if you are able to without insult.
When the NRA Supported Gun Control
You are building your case on little factoids, while ignoring much larger facts that contradict your claim.
BS. In the past I believed that The supreme court was legit. It wasn’t until you made your post about Heller being a Trojan horse that I changed my opinion. I’m capable of changing my opinion you aren’t. Instead you resort to insults when you have nothing.This is your opinion. Can you prove it? In the past me and others couldn't convince you of hard facts, what would be the point to argue opinions with someone like you. You know what they say about opinions. They are like assholes, especially yours.
Ah yes little facts. Like the NRA helping write the NFA. Or wanting handgun licenses, or getting NICS. Stupid pesky facts getting in the way of cucks wanting to say the NRA is pro 2A
Don't say the "c" word!!!This is all they did, right? They done nothing to support 2a, right? They initiated the push for above measures, it wasn't a compromise they made?
This is all they did, right? They done nothing to support 2a, right? They initiated the push for above measures, it wasn't a compromise they made?
Compromise is what got us here. It’s what opened the door to more gun laws. If anyone cannot see that, they are blind.
Suppose the NRA would have gone after the Sullivan Act? Where would we be today? Heller wouldn’t even have existed since DC wouldn’t have had a handgun ban.
Suppose the NRA would have gone after the First federal assault weapons ban? There would be no Safe Act.
Compromise and inaction is what got us to where we are today.
Correct. May not have succeeded. Inaction is a sure way to not succeed however. They pleaded with Alan Gura to not fight the DC handgun ban. If he would have listened, DC and Illinois would still have the ban.You are making a huge assumption here. NRA is not as powerful as you think. Yes, they should have done more, but that doesn't mean they would have succeeded.
Correct. May not have succeeded. Inaction is a sure way to not succeed however. They pleaded with Alan Gura to not fight the DC handgun ban. If he would have listened, DC and Illinois would still have the ban.