California Mag ban ruled unconstitutional

L

livingston

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
50,442
Reaction score
137,689
Location
livingston county
Breitbart News noted that Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) reacted to Benitez’s decision by posting to X:

California’s high-capacity magazine ban was just STRUCK DOWN by Judge Benitez, an extremist, right-wing zealot with no regard to human life.
Wake up, America.
Click to expand...
Newsom added, “Our gun safety laws will continue to be thrown out by NRA-owned federal judges until we pass a Constitutional Amendment to protect our kids and end the gun violence epidemic in America.”
www.breitbart.com

Federal Judge Blocks California 'High-Capacity' Magazine Ban for 2nd Time

U.S. District Court Judge Roger T. Benitez blocked California's ban on ammunition magazines holding more than ten rounds on Friday.
www.breitbart.com www.breitbart.com
 
maverick52

maverick52

.223 Rem
Messages
1,115
Reaction score
2,197
Location
Knowhere
one can only hope this may be the turn around. Newsome is showing his cards…a new constitutional amendment! Good luck with that buddy.
 
spat

spat

.950 JDJ
Messages
30,234
Reaction score
63,900
Location
Formerly Geneseo, NY. Now free in AZ
maverick52 said:
one can only hope this may be the turn around. Newsome is showing his cards…a new constitutional amendment! Good luck with that buddy.
Click to expand...
Any ammendment that repeals one of the bill of rights is effectively dissolving the constitution, and the legitimacy of the federal government with it.

Just saying.
 
tgenec86

tgenec86

.357 mag
Messages
648
Reaction score
1,668
Location
Utica, NY
And a higher court will overrule this 50X faster than if it were an unconstitutional "law" imposed by a Fascist Regime like happens in NYS every year. Victory my ass. The system is beyond rigged.
 
ArmedCorgi

ArmedCorgi

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
14,422
Reaction score
22,638
Location
Utahardia
spat said:
Any ammendment that repeals one of the bill of rights is effectively dissolving the constitution, and the legitimacy of the federal government with it.

Just saying.
Click to expand...
Very true. However, it's not like the military (the only entity that could and should quickly resolve the matter in the favor of the people) would do anything about it. Not until they actually realize that their *cough* "elected" civilian handlers are in fact, thee greatest domestic enemy of our time.
 
Pissed Off Patriot

Pissed Off Patriot

.223 Rem
Messages
1,240
Reaction score
2,724
Location
If you can't stand the heat Get out of the kitchen
Bob said:
And then the state says "fuck you" to the supreme court and enacts an even more restrictive law. New York has already set that precedent, several states have followed suit, and the supreme court has refused to intervene.


So I repeat myself:
Click to expand...

What you are saying is if the magazine ban was lifted due to a Supreme Court decision, NY would apply the same principles to magazines that they do to ammo.

Background checks to buy a magazine, additional fees on the sale of magazines, etc. etc. etc....
 
B

Bob

6.5 Creedmoor
Messages
2,481
Reaction score
4,827
Location
Livingston
Pissed Off Patriot said:
What you are saying is if the magazine ban was lifted due to a Supreme Court decision, NY would apply the same principles to magazines that they do to ammo.

Background checks to buy a magazine, additional fees on the sale of magazines, etc. etc. etc....
Click to expand...
I'm saying that New York State is going to do whatever the hell the want to do, regardless of what the Supreme Court says. Decades of unchecked corruption and arrogance have led New York lawmakers to feel like they can get away with whatever the hell they want. Herr Cuomo STILL thinks he's innocent and is actively trying to take down the people whom he thinks are responsible for his downfall.
 
L

livingston

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
50,442
Reaction score
137,689
Location
livingston county
Pissed Off Patriot said:
What you are saying is if the magazine ban was lifted due to a Supreme Court decision, NY would apply the same principles to magazines that they do to ammo.

Background checks to buy a magazine, additional fees on the sale of magazines, etc. etc. etc....
Click to expand...
Interesting .... The judge in California said that mags are part of the gun ... NY could treat that as if it is part of the gun you need a Background check to purchase one ... And a need to register them ...
 
spat

spat

.950 JDJ
Messages
30,234
Reaction score
63,900
Location
Formerly Geneseo, NY. Now free in AZ
Pissed Off Patriot said:
What you are saying is if the magazine ban was lifted due to a Supreme Court decision, NY would apply the same principles to magazines that they do to ammo.

Background checks to buy a magazine, additional fees on the sale of magazines, etc. etc. etc....
Click to expand...
Background checks with renewals (annual, monthly, weekly ?) to *possess* magazines.

And they can probably only be reloaded by a licensed gunsmith.
 
T

Truebeliever

6.5 Creedmoor
Messages
2,490
Reaction score
1,622
Location
Nys
Pissed Off Patriot said:
What you are saying is if the magazine ban was lifted due to a Supreme Court decision, NY would apply the same principles to magazines that they do to ammo.

Background checks to buy a magazine, additional fees on the sale of magazines, etc. etc. etc....
Click to expand...
Yep. They would at least try. It’s a the last gasp type effort . It buys them time . Time to try to overall the supreme court as Justices expire.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top