Can Trump Do Anything To NYS Safe Act?

[MoMan]

They should when a state shits on a legally ratified ammendment to the United states constitution. If a state banned catholics, everyone would expect the feds to step in and protect the first ammendment rights, nothing wrong with the fed stepping in to protect the rights guaranteed by the second ammendment.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

That is why I am saying that the best thing that could happen is for it to end up in front of the SCOTUS! The Federal Government should NEVER, EVER be able to push their will over a State. If a state is violating the civil OR constitutional rights of it's citizens, then the SCOTUS should rule on it being unconstitutional and therefor not allowed, NOT a Federal mandate. Like I said that would become a very slippery slope. REMEMBER, the tide will eventually flow the other way and we DO NOT want the Federal Government to be able to overreach it's authority.

Might not be a priority on his list, but if the courts change up, it could be overturned as unconstitutional with a conservative majority in the SCOTUS.

BINGO!! This right here is how it will happen!!

 

[ArmedCorgi]

That is why I am saying that the best thing that could happen is for it to end up in front of the SCOTUS! The Federal Government should NEVER, EVER be able to push their will over a State. If a state is violating the civil OR constitutional rights of it's citizens, then the SCOTUS should rule on it being unconstitutional and therefor not allowed, NOT a Federal mandate. Like I said that would become a very slippery slope. REMEMBER, the tide will eventually flow the other way and we DO NOT want the Federal Government to be able to overreach it's authority.



BINGO!! This right here is how it will happen!!

I agree with you, but for christ sake, the Feds mandated health care (a non-civil right) which to me is WAY worse than the Feds stepping in and mandating that the states adhere to the US Constitution and Bill of Rights.

 

[vanderblack]

I'll toss a little realism out here. The NY SAFE ACT is not a priority on trump's list... and no, he won't do anything about it.

NY Safe Act may not be but its not just about NY. CA, Conn, Oregon, VA, and the list goes on. There are a lot of states with various portions of SAFE and a lot of people looking to Trump to get involved. He will. He is running down his campaign list and checking things off one by one. He may not be successful with everything but I do believe he will try to address everything.

 

[GOPerfect]

I'll toss a little realism out here. The NY SAFE ACT is not a priority on trump's list... and no, he won't do anything about it.

Uzi, I am picking up what you are putting down. And, I agree, too a point.

I do not believe he will go after the SAFE Act by name, I do believe however, he will go after States as a whole with these Bullshit laws and regulations.

 

[ArmedCorgi]

Uzi, I am picking up what you are putting down. And, I agree, too a point.

I do not believe he will go after the SAFE Act by name, I do believe however, he will go after States as a whole with these Bullshit laws and regulations.

So same same.

 

[Defilade]

Got to get Gorsuch in and get to work!