Discuss.
AKs used to enjoy a significant price advantage over ARs but now........ it really does come down to preference. I like and enjoy shooting both but the AR15 is objectively lighter and faster to run and also much easier to service when parts do break. Regardless the rugged simplicity of AKs is also appealing.
When I ran the Galil at the last carbine class (and it is an AK) I was still a legend to do the reloads efficiently. I am a huge fan of the left side cocking handle of the Ace.
There is nothing wrong with the AR charging handle, especially with the upgraded ambi ones like the Raptor or Geisellle ones. It's out if the way, doesn't snag and you only use it every now and then anyway. Yes locking the bolt open manually is awkward but you never will be doing that under stress, it's an administrative action. AKs you can't lock the bolt back in any fashion at all which I consider a major flaw in a modern combat arm.I love the AK and other kalashnikovs pattern guns (I really miss my VZ58) they look awesome even today, they function and feel great.
But I do believe Stoner got it write with his design, the ergonomics (not counting the charging handle which isnt really and issue do to bolt hold open) is the gold standard, size cant be beat, and the modularity is something everyone is still trying to compete with.
But AKs man
That is true I guess. I haven't ever heard of a charging handle breaking other than the latch, have you? Not to say it can't or hasn't happened.The worst part about the ar15 is the charger. It's design does stop shit from getting in the rifle. Other then inconvenient to use my gripe with it is if the charger ever breaks your fucked. Although ive never broken one or really put it to the test.
The way I see it is the AK is a platform that doesn't need as much maintenance. If you dump dirt into any rifles trigger group or chamber it's gonna have problems. The AK will run a bit longer dry and fouled up. But how fast could you open an AR and change the bolt and carrier if needed.
Iv8888 did a bunch of full auto tortures to the AR and AK both failed the AR in general seemed to do better.
I'd love to own an AK and get an AR again if I can own one without government regulations. The vz58 and 805 bren would be on my shortlist as well if I ever live in a free state again.
I've never seen one broke but Ive never been in a stressful situation yanking on the thing like my life depended on it. The milspec charger just seems like such a flimsy part in general. I don't have any expiriance with aftermarket handles I don't know if they are studier or not. I'm a big fan of the ar15 design and I think it's the apex of firearm technology as it stands today.
Maybe not the apex but it certainly is the universal rifle of the times. Much like the Winchester 1873 was the definitive rifle of its era. And the Old American long rifles whether called Kentucky or Pennsylvania rifles were the iconic arms of colonial times.I've never seen one broke but Ive never been in a stressful situation yanking on the thing like my life depended on it. The milspec charger just seems like such a flimsy part in general. I don't have any expiriance with aftermarket handles I don't know if they are studier or not. I'm a big fan of the ar15 design and I think it's the apex of firearm technology as it stands today.
It's bent upwards where it snapped. Maybe it was mortered when it broke?Honestly even yanking on the thing seems like it wouldn't do much, most of the pressure is directed in a linear direction causing no real stress on the handle, it's only really janky for side to side which thanks to the design is kind of hard to pull of when just yanking on it.
The above picture not clue how he broke that one I wouldn't be surprised if it was them fucking around. Or showing a demonstration in the wrong way to do something, or broke it to break it lol
I like the Geiselle one a bit better. It seems a little sturdier.Raptor charging handles are the bees knees
I like the Geiselle one a bit better. It seems a little sturdier.