AG Merrick Garland Announces The DOJ Will Scrutinize any Post-Election Audits for Evidence of Voting Law Violations
Eric Holder made a statement the other day thar DOJ should get involved in audits
This is a state matter NOT a federal. Time for States to start arresting folks and jail time imposed if need be...Look what the DOJ and their dirty tentacles like the FBI did to Trump for four years. Yeah, they want to take over this fraud to make sure it never comes to light of day, or at the very least stall it and muddy it up enough to give big media the tools to delegitimize it.
Robin
Hah! every thing is a federal matter, just ask Garland. It would warm my heart to see or hear of Arizona lawmen arresting DOJ people .This is a state matter NOT a federal. Time for States to start arresting folks and jail time imposed if need be...
They can and should do it. It would definitely be a potent sign to all that states are still sovereign. I think that is something most people have forgotten over the years as our federal government has continued to grow out of control and the media has supported it.Hah! every thing is a federal matter, just ask Garland. It would warm my heart to see or hear of Arizona lawmen arresting DOJ people .
Robin
What are they worried about? Biden is in!
spin spin spin
AZ designated their electors.Something a lot of people are missing in this whole AZ audit thing.
The Dems will try and say, when AZ is de-certified, that Xiden still has enough electoral votes so it doesn't matter. Except it does in a big way.
Because the part everyone is missing is - Trump still has not conceded the election! This is very important for what comes next.
You see, if AZ decertifies their results the ENTIRE election is now in question. Congress cannot certify election until ALL states have certified. Just like a state cannot certify unless 100% of their counties certify, the same is true of a national election with the states themselves.
As Trump hasn't conceded, he now has a right to contest the entire election and that will mean the remaining 49 states will have to conduct a full forensic audit as a result.
Why do you think so many states are visiting AZ for the audit right now, including states that supposedly already went Trump and didn't have contested election issues? They know what is coming.
Do you all remember prior to the 2018 election Trump signed an EO making national elections a matter of national security?
Now put two and two together. If even ONE state shows fraud it calls into question the results of the entire election. Being a matter of national security now puts it under the purview of who as forensic audits are done state to state?
If you answered the military you are on the right track.
Now, the states will TRY to claim that it is state sovereignty and the Feds cannot do that. However, for anyone who has read my Storm Series the military is NOT federal - it belongs to the individual states as that is where the citizens in the military are derived from. Therefore, the state being a part of the US means the military in each state may take over. True, citizen soldiers from Texas, for example, could not oversee the audit in Michigan, but the military will be able to oversee it just fine.
There will be states that will take this up on their own to avoid the military. There will be states that will resist. However, as Trump warned them BEFORE certifying the results, the legislatures in states that resist and refuse to do audits will now find themselves embroiled in accessory to fraud once the audits are done.
But you see, here is where it gets good. Once the election is "on hold" while results are determined it means the current fraud President is technically not holding office. But neither is the former President.
So who gets to run things while this all gets sorted out? How do you introduce all the military evidence they collected in the sting? Why you have the military LEGALLY engaged in a national security issue and then they turn up with the evidence of foreign involvement.
As I previously said in the Storm Series - this is why you only need ONE state to turn up fraud. I hope now more understand why.
Either the states are going to band together and fix this in defiance of the Federal Government since it calls into question the legitimacy of the entire government (I mentioned this in Part IV) or the military is going to take control, per the Law of War manual, until this is sorted out.
Let's say they do find massive fraud and can prove Biden did not in fact win election...There has got to be some provision that removes the fraudulent official from office. How could it be that someone who wasn't elected but was certified under false pretenses is allowed to stay in office making laws/policy and appointing people to important positions? Would we just be in a constitutional crisis and uncharted territory or do the states have some kind of recourse short of, impeachment, or armed rebellion?AZ designated their electors.
Their electors voted for Biden.
Those are the only votes that count. A state doesn't get to say "we changed our mind about what electors to send" post hoc.
The votes they are recounting are irrelevant at this point.
AZ can't change their votes in the electoral college anymore than some Libertarian can now say "wait, If I voted for Trump instead of Jo we wouldn't have Biden now ? I changed my mind".
Not about changing their minds. Fraud was found. De-certify the machines at least.AZ designated their electors.
Their electors voted for Biden.
Those are the only votes that count. A state doesn't get to say "we changed our mind about what electors to send" post hoc.
The votes they are recounting are irrelevant at this point.
AZ can't change their votes in the electoral college anymore than some Libertarian can now say "wait, If I voted for Trump instead of Jo we wouldn't have Biden now ? I changed my mind".
Yes, people would go to prison.Not about changing their minds. Fraud was found. De-certify the machines at least.
If they can prove Biden was complicit in the fraud, they could impeach him.Let's say they do find massive fraud and can prove Biden did not in fact win election...There has got to be some provision that removes the fraudulent official from office. How could it be that someone who wasn't elected but was certified under false pretenses is allowed to stay in office making laws/policy and appointing people to important positions? Would we just be in a constitutional crisis and uncharted territory or do the states have some kind of recourse short of, impeachment, or armed rebellion?