Dan Crenshaw planned gun control all along

Podmonkey

Podmonkey

.577 Tyrannosaur.
U.S. Military
Messages
21,172
Reaction score
29,441
Location
Cambria co. PA
SomeSoldier

SomeSoldier

.450/400 Nitro Ex
U.S. Military
Messages
10,083
Reaction score
19,471
Location
Florida
Dan is a butt pirate. Here to plunder our rights for his financial gain. Just like every other congressman and the NRA.
 
505PIR

505PIR

.38 Special
Messages
28
Reaction score
23
Location
Troy
I think the comments about his eye injury are childish, one can disagree with his political stance on an issue without being disrespectful of his service. I support background checks, I don't support new laws, I want the reporting system and data base improved. I oppose any law that violates HIPPA and the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments regarding due process rights. I think what Dan Crenshaw is talking about is H.R.838, my understanding is it establishes a national task force to recommend mental health standards for red flag laws and sunsets in 180 days after creation. Where I view it as potentially dangerous is that once standards have been created if the wrong party manages to write and pass a national red flag law without clear protections for due process, abuse will happen, and be encouraged to further a political agenda. In politics you will never find a candidate or party that reflects your views 100% of the time, politicians in general wet their finger and hold it in the air to see what direction the wind is blowing, if you expect anything more, you will be disappointed. The greatest threat to our Second Amendment rights are the assh8les who are doing these shootings, we would do well to support laws that weed them out as much as possible while protecting our rights because if we do nothing and oppose everything, the other side will certainly capitalize on the mass hysteria to destroy the Second Amendment.
 
Podmonkey

Podmonkey

.577 Tyrannosaur.
U.S. Military
Messages
21,172
Reaction score
29,441
Location
Cambria co. PA
505PIR said:
I think the comments about his eye injury are childish, one can disagree with his political stance on an issue without being disrespectful of his service. I support background checks, I don't support new laws, I want the reporting system and data base improved. I oppose any law that violates HIPPA and the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments regarding due process rights. I think what Dan Crenshaw is talking about is H.R.838, my understanding is it establishes a national task force to recommend mental health standards for red flag laws and sunsets in 180 days after creation. Where I view it as potentially dangerous is that once standards have been created if the wrong party manages to write and pass a national red flag law without clear protections for due process, abuse will happen, and be encouraged to further a political agenda. In politics you will never find a candidate or party that reflects your views 100% of the time, politicians in general wet their finger and hold it in the air to see what direction the wind is blowing, if you expect anything more, you will be disappointed. The greatest threat to our Second Amendment rights are the assh8les who are doing these shootings, we would do well to support laws that weed them out as much as possible while protecting our rights because if we do nothing and oppose everything, the other side will certainly capitalize on the mass hysteria to destroy the Second Amendment.
Click to expand...
The very fact that people think that "these shootings" have anything to do with our constitutional rights is the real problem.
I do think comments regarding his eye patch are childish and do nothing to further the discussion but while I understand the reading the wind thing I do not accept it.
The rights codified in the constitution are inherent and due to any human being on this earth upon birth. Any and all legislation regarding guns is only ever introduced with the intent to restrict ownership by the lawful citizenry which is unacceptable.
Background checks are made to sound reasonable and sensible but they have not prevented these events. Now with red flag laws we have ventured into the concept of "pre-crime".
Any politician that supports legislation that weakens or is contrary to the constitution is a traitor. And all politicians are traitors as far as I am concerned.
 
Robin

Robin

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
19,433
Reaction score
41,726
Location
Livingston County
505PIR said:
I think the comments about his eye injury are childish, one can disagree with his political stance on an issue without being disrespectful of his service. I support background checks, I don't support new laws, I want the reporting system and data base improved. I oppose any law that violates HIPPA and the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments regarding due process rights. I think what Dan Crenshaw is talking about is H.R.838, my understanding is it establishes a national task force to recommend mental health standards for red flag laws and sunsets in 180 days after creation. Where I view it as potentially dangerous is that once standards have been created if the wrong party manages to write and pass a national red flag law without clear protections for due process, abuse will happen, and be encouraged to further a political agenda. In politics you will never find a candidate or party that reflects your views 100% of the time, politicians in general wet their finger and hold it in the air to see what direction the wind is blowing, if you expect anything more, you will be disappointed. The greatest threat to our Second Amendment rights are the assh8les who are doing these shootings, we would do well to support laws that weed them out as much as possible while protecting our rights because if we do nothing and oppose everything, the other side will certainly capitalize on the mass hysteria to destroy the Second Amendment.
Click to expand...

You are talking politics and compromise. You must not have been around long enough to know we have compromised ourselves, virtually, out of any real second amendment. No more compromise, no more stupid laws that are nothing but political ass covering. It's long past time to take the offensive and get these stupid laws, that affect no one but the honest American citizen exercising his God given rights, off the books. EFM
Robin
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top