Post #23: "As long as I, as a payer of taxes, need to be forced to care for these personal choices, I against your notion of full personal choices."
I, the payer of taxers, am forced to care for these personal choices (mass shootings), therefore I am against full personal choices.
Drugs are not the only thing someone can do in order to create a burden on society. You can commit a mass shooting, rob a bank, rape an innocent person, scam people, etc... There are plenty of things as a result of "personal choice" that create a burden on society. Where do you draw the line? At what point are we obligated to actually make data-driven decisions instead of emotionally-driven ones?
This thread is specifically about drugs. I am staying on that topic.
I never involve my feelings into these types of conversations.
Give me a few minutes I'll finish my lunch and I will add more...