Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
Dem's Gun Publicity Stunt Just Got Worse
- Thread starter Acer-m14
- Start date
GTN
.308 Win
RedBreast21
6.5 Creedmoor
Just enter the title Dems publicity stunt just got worse (cut and paste) into Youtube.
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
Probably deemed adult content.
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
This is what the video is about. A democrat who is of course a gun rights supporter did a photo op at a “gun range” with guns supplied by a felon and shot steel targets at 10 yards. Well a ricochet decided to hit a reporter and the moron posted a photo op of him treating the wound because he’s a war hero like Walz.
apnews.com
Flyaway metal from Missouri Democratic Senate candidate's rifle grazes reporter at campaign event
A Missouri reporter was injured slightly by a metal fragment from Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Lucas Kunce as he practiced shooting at a campaign event.
apnews.com
1075tech
.338 Win Mag
Article/video consistently refer to "felony charges". Being charged is not the same as being convicted.
What's the over/under on those charges being dropped or reduced now?
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
Still not legally allowed to possess guns. These are fraud charges and not violent so I don’t agree with removing his guns so it’s hard for me to crap on him too much.
1075tech
.338 Win Mag
Possess? Or purchase?
Just a charge itself would require surrender? I think it would be up to the court where the charge was made.
Was he charged or indicted? Being under indictment applies if you were completing a 4473.
c. Are you under indictment or information in any court for a felony, or any other crime for which the judge could imprison you for more than one year, or are you a current member of the military who has been charged with violation(s) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice and whose charge(s) have been referred to a general court-martial?
d. Have you ever been convicted in any court, including a military court, of a felony, or any other crime for which the judge could have imprisoned you for more than one year, even if you received a shorter sentence including probation
Being charged or indicted is much different that being convicted.
The point I'm trying to make is that the video makes a big deal about being charged with felonies. Unless he was convicted of those felonies, it doesn't necessarily mean he was a prohibited person.
Disclaimer: I am not a legal scholar. I have been known to be wrong before.