Election Coverage And Results Thread

tirwin1

tirwin1

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
17,383
Reaction score
48,139
Location
rochester
JaguarJaguarGolf said:
Old Chinese curse: "May you live in interesting times".

I think the time period between December 15th and noon on January 20th 2021 could be very interesting.

Especially if the Electoral College or the Congress vote former Vice-President Biden as President-elect
Click to expand...
Between the election and covid I think the next few months will be very interesting. As in I am not looking forward to them.
 
spat

spat

.950 JDJ
Messages
30,131
Reaction score
63,619
Location
Formerly Geneseo, NY. Now free in AZ
Blimey said:
She might. I've been a good boy lately! When Biden is inaugurated in January she won't think back to the weeks and months I spent ranting about election fraud and she won't have to try and forget all the times I assured her that any day now it would all be proven in court.
Click to expand...
When the stock market crashes and your retirement is wiped out, and the "mandatory buy back" happens, one of you ends up in a quarantine camp because you forgot your travel papers, are you still going to say "well, at least we didn't fight about Trump back in 2020".
 
GOYABEAN

GOYABEAN

.950 JDJ
Messages
34,640
Reaction score
70,573
Location
Land of Freedom PA
spat said:
When the stock market crashes and your retirement is wiped out, and the "mandatory buy back" happens, one of you ends up in a quarantine camp because you forgot your travel papers, are you still going to say "well, at least we didn't fight about Trump back in 2020".
Click to expand...
The real sad part is they'll always and continuously blame Trump know matter what :screwy: orange man bad .
 
Steal2B

Steal2B

.700 Nitro Express
Messages
26,232
Reaction score
82,691
Location
Dutchess County
ArmedCorgi said:
How reliable is that?
Click to expand...
Very... Meaning he said it.

Just like Biden said what he did.

In the environment now ... where leftist crimes go with no consequences .... that is the problem ... proving their crime, often beyond the threshold of reasonable doubt, is not hard with them being so arrogant and ham fisted.
 
Phazer

Phazer

.450/400 Nitro Ex
Messages
9,868
Reaction score
21,066
Location
Province of Westchester
Darth

Darth

Bunny In Chief
Messages
19,570
Reaction score
24,777
Location
MoCo
spat said:
We statistically prove negatives every day.

Many of our government processes are designed around it.

We usually use the phrase "prove it's safe" which is the same thing as "prove it's not dangerous". i.e. proving a negative.

Want to market a new drug ? You need to prove it's safe.

Want to sell a car ? You need to prove it's safe.

Want to build a bridge ? You need to prove it's reliable.

Want to hold an election ? "we can't prove it's not going to be riddled with fraud, you just have to accept the results".


THIS ISN'T ABOUT PROVING FRAUD.

This is about an election that was executed with no assurances that there wouldn't be massive fraud, and no way to prove it afterwards.
Click to expand...
It's logically impossible to prove a negative.

So it isn't something we do every day. It's never been done in the history of logic.
 
L

livingston

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
50,277
Reaction score
137,323
Location
livingston county
tirwin1 said:
Between the election and covid I think the next few months will be very interesting. As in I am not looking forward to them.
Click to expand...
Hope you have prepped for it... Between Cuomo and Biden (if he wins ) destruction of the economy will be a main focus... They will reward their base and destroy conservatives
 
cgrutt

cgrutt

.338 Win Mag
NYGF Vendor
Monthly Donor
Messages
8,996
Reaction score
17,045
Location
Interwebz
Darth said:
It's logically impossible to prove a negative.

So it isn't something we do every day. It's never been done in the history of logic.
Click to expand...

Perhaps in the realm of supernatural but alas we find ourselves at the present moment in the world of laws and men where threshold of proof is not even beyond a reasonable doubt but merely preponderance of evidence.
 
J

JaguarJaguarGolf

6.5 Creedmoor
Messages
2,182
Reaction score
3,691
Location
Orange County NY
So on or around December 12th, before the Electoral College meets, President Trump declares a National Security Emergency. Some state governors, legislatures, and courts are acting in concert with foreign entities to impose a government on the people of the United States.
He orders the Secretary of Defence to seize these persons, suspends Habeous Corpus as Lincoln did, seizes all their assets and property, seizes broadcast licenses, property and assets of CNN, NBC, ABC...etc. and individual working for these companies as participants in the plot.
President Trump broadcasts to the Nation that when this plot is routed out, we will have an election free from foreign influence.
Remember he is in office for 6 more weeks after mid December and must exercise the responsibilities of that office so help him God.
 
Darth

Darth

Bunny In Chief
Messages
19,570
Reaction score
24,777
Location
MoCo
cgrutt said:
Perhaps in the realm of supernatural but alas we find ourselves at the present moment in the world of laws and men where threshold of proof is not even beyond a reasonable doubt but merely preponderance of evidence.
Click to expand...
No supernatural needed.

Nobody here can prove I don't have a gold played Ferrari in my driveway.
 
Blimey

Blimey

.450/400 Nitro Ex
Messages
11,279
Reaction score
16,255
Location
Western NY
spat said:
If you didn't think this was going to end up at SCOTUS from the minute they announced the widespread mail in voting was going to happen, you must have been asleep.
Click to expand...
If it makes it to SCOTUS they’ll laugh it out of court, too.

Now Christie is telling trump to shut up:

www.cnbc.com

Chris Christie tells Trump to end election lawsuits, calls his legal team 'national embarrassment'

Christie described Trump's legal team as a "national embarrassment" and Powell's explosive claims as "outrageous conduct."
www.cnbc.com www.cnbc.com


Wonder how long until a tweet from trump about how Christie is a deep swamp rino.
 
Blimey

Blimey

.450/400 Nitro Ex
Messages
11,279
Reaction score
16,255
Location
Western NY
Dr. Evil said:
Mrs. Evil and I are on the same page as far as what's best for this country. If things don't work out like WE hope as discouraged as WE will be WE won't feel like what WE did was in vain. WE fought the good fight until the bitter end. No regrets whatsoever. You on the other hand will probably sleep very soundly at night knowing that you were so concerned about keeping harmony with your spouse, which you admitted, that you were willing to throw the country in the shitter in multiple aspects by doing so. Sucks being you lol. Now, get ready for the possible national mandate by your boy to mask up and lock down chicken little. Although you probably have been in that mode for some time I'm sure.
Click to expand...
What is really shocking is that it appears you think harmony in a marriage is less important than voting for trump. o_O
 
Blimey

Blimey

.450/400 Nitro Ex
Messages
11,279
Reaction score
16,255
Location
Western NY
spat said:
We statistically prove negatives every day.

Many of our government processes are designed around it.

We usually use the phrase "prove it's safe" which is the same thing as "prove it's not dangerous". i.e. proving a negative.

Want to market a new drug ? You need to prove it's safe.

Want to sell a car ? You need to prove it's safe.

Want to build a bridge ? You need to prove it's reliable.

Want to hold an election ? "we can't prove it's not going to be riddled with fraud, you just have to accept the results".


THIS ISN'T ABOUT PROVING FRAUD.

This is about an election that was executed with no assurances that there wouldn't be massive fraud, and no way to prove it afterwards.
Click to expand...
That is not how court works; Prove a crime is how it works.

Trump has yet to prove any fraud in court. His elite strike force tactical magic legal team are thoroughly inept, so this is not surprising.
 
Blimey

Blimey

.450/400 Nitro Ex
Messages
11,279
Reaction score
16,255
Location
Western NY
masterswimmer said:
He's an even bigger pussy than you're eluding to. We've heard his anti Trump diatribes for many many months, if not years. We know his personal disdain for our President. Yet he throws his wife under the bus saying he wanted to keep her happy with his vote. He couldn't man up and just vote for Biden without dragging his wife into the fray.
Click to expand...
That is a remarkable amount of anger you’re unleashing. I wonder how long it was building for. Hopefully you feel better now.
 
spat

spat

.950 JDJ
Messages
30,131
Reaction score
63,619
Location
Formerly Geneseo, NY. Now free in AZ
Darth said:
It's logically impossible to prove a negative.

So it isn't something we do every day. It's never been done in the history of logic.
Click to expand...
You are right, we can't prove that a drug will be safe before we approve it.

But we do insist on strong assurances that it will be.

Why is it unreasonable to expect the same from an election ?
 
Defilade

Defilade

.700 Nitro Express
Messages
26,403
Reaction score
38,004
Location
Elsewhere
Blimey said:
If it makes it to SCOTUS they’ll laugh it out of court, too.

Now Christie is telling trump to shut up:

www.cnbc.com

Chris Christie tells Trump to end election lawsuits, calls his legal team 'national embarrassment'

Christie described Trump's legal team as a "national embarrassment" and Powell's explosive claims as "outrageous conduct."
www.cnbc.com www.cnbc.com


Wonder how long until a tweet from trump about how Christie is a deep swamp rino.
Click to expand...
You mean the same fat ass Christie that closed the whole beach so he and his family could sun themselves? Lol
 
Darth

Darth

Bunny In Chief
Messages
19,570
Reaction score
24,777
Location
MoCo
Defilade said:
Citation please? Lol
Click to expand...
spat said:
We statistically prove negatives every day.

Many of our government processes are designed around it.

We usually use the phrase "prove it's safe" which is the same thing as "prove it's not dangerous". i.e. proving a negative.

Want to market a new drug ? You need to prove it's safe.

Want to sell a car ? You need to prove it's safe.

Want to build a bridge ? You need to prove it's reliable.
Click to expand...
 
spat

spat

.950 JDJ
Messages
30,131
Reaction score
63,619
Location
Formerly Geneseo, NY. Now free in AZ
Blimey said:
That is not how court works; Prove a crime is how it works.

Trump has yet to prove any fraud in court. His elite strike force tactical magic legal team are thoroughly inept, so this is not surprising.
Click to expand...
I'm not talking about proving it in court.

I am talking about convincing the 46% of the people that believe there was extensive fraud that there wasn't.
 
Darth

Darth

Bunny In Chief
Messages
19,570
Reaction score
24,777
Location
MoCo
spat said:
You are right, we can't prove that a drug will be safe before we approve it.

But we do insist on strong assurances that it will be.

Why is it unreasonable to expect the same from an election ?
Click to expand...
It's not, but that isn't really the issue at hand.

The drug has been released to market. You now want them to pull it back.

Provide reason.
 
L

livingston

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
50,277
Reaction score
137,323
Location
livingston county
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top