Family of Las Vegas mas shooting victim sues gun makers
- Thread starter Deplorable Me
- Start date
Deplorable Me
.700 Nitro Express
The victims families will be the victims when the court hands them the tab for the defendants court cost. I wonder how hard the lawyers trolled for this case?
Carlos Hathcock
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue .......
Yea, it's EVERYBODY'S fault, except the fucking mass murderer!!!
I hate these fucking leeches!! Give me my payday!!
Fuck that, they should be suing the mass murderer's estate. If there's nothing there, then too fucking bad.
I bet if they tried to sue the mass murderer's family, the courts would see that as ridiculous!! But yet it is O.K. to sue the manufacturer of a LEGAL, INANIMATE object!!
Yea, that makes sense!!
I hate these fucking leeches!! Give me my payday!!
Fuck that, they should be suing the mass murderer's estate. If there's nothing there, then too fucking bad.
I bet if they tried to sue the mass murderer's family, the courts would see that as ridiculous!! But yet it is O.K. to sue the manufacturer of a LEGAL, INANIMATE object!!
Yea, that makes sense!!
Last edited:
spat
.950 JDJ
The plaintiffs lawyers should be on the hook for the defendants court costs (plus penalties) in frivolous cases like this.
It's one thing to punish a grieving family, but the bloodsucking lawyers that are abusing them are the real criminals here.
It's one thing to punish a grieving family, but the bloodsucking lawyers that are abusing them are the real criminals here.
I am tired beyond words of dealing with the ignorance of anti gunners. Fuck these people and fuck their pain. Live free or die!
Camaro45th
.357 mag
Kind of makes you think: you never see a criminal’s family suing the gun manufacturers when their family gets killed in the middle of a shootout with Police.
Modean
.223 Rem
This case will last long enough for the defense to demonstrate that any semi-automatic can be bump fired.
Yeah and I can take the limiter of a hayabusa and turn it into a 200+ mph bike. I don't think my family would get to sue Suzuki when I die.
It still pisses me off that they were/are suing the hotel. It wasn't their fault either
Enough of this bullshit. If anyone here knows someone injured in a car accident because of another driver they should encourage them to sue the manufacturer of the at fault drivers vehicle. Obviously the vehicle was misused
It still pisses me off that they were/are suing the hotel. It wasn't their fault either
Enough of this bullshit. If anyone here knows someone injured in a car accident because of another driver they should encourage them to sue the manufacturer of the at fault drivers vehicle. Obviously the vehicle was misused
Nevar
.357 mag
I don't think it will get to far. Way to many unanswered questions will have to be answered.
oc shooter
.223 Rem
dislike liars for hire
How about suing the parents of this mass murderer, or the doctor/hospital that delivered him, or the schools that he went to, or the...
repete
.338 Win Mag
496HP!! Do you know most tractor trailers weigh up to 80,000 and have only four more horse power?I did! no more government restriction....plus a 496hp turbo...8.29et at 180.5mph..
View attachment 48322
View attachment 48321
gun_slinger_boy
.338 Win Mag
I bet the bike is advertised as 500HP but actually has 496. So the tractor is probably the same thing. Just like when a bike is advertised as 250cc but is actually 249cc. The human brain likes round numbers. I could be wrong though.
3 components necessary for a valid lawsuit...
1. An affected Party
2. Culpability/Negligence
3. Something to sue that has value
The "Gun" manufacturer can be no more responsible than an automobile manufacturer who's product is used in a criminal act.
The "Gun" manufacturer's product actually "worked" as they were intended to.
The case has no merit either and the judge should not allow it to proceed. But of course, today's judicial has reinvented itself as to embody the legislative in it's mandate... Simply amazing but true. Courts outright ignore guidance and direction even from the Court most high, the SCOTUS. So it's all a crapshoot... Shop judges favorable to your ideology, ie, Federal 9th, and give it a go!
1. An affected Party
2. Culpability/Negligence
3. Something to sue that has value
The "Gun" manufacturer can be no more responsible than an automobile manufacturer who's product is used in a criminal act.
The "Gun" manufacturer's product actually "worked" as they were intended to.
The case has no merit either and the judge should not allow it to proceed. But of course, today's judicial has reinvented itself as to embody the legislative in it's mandate... Simply amazing but true. Courts outright ignore guidance and direction even from the Court most high, the SCOTUS. So it's all a crapshoot... Shop judges favorable to your ideology, ie, Federal 9th, and give it a go!
