Oh and still waiting for proof that
And you just admitted you do nothing!
And you just admitted you do nothing!
Tell me how "the people" doesnt apply to.... the people.
The 2A doesnt grant a person the right to own arms. It (oh hey applying to the federal government) prevents the government from preventing people to keep and bear arms.. it's a restriction on the government not a permission slip to people.
But hey let's skip over the other part.. your personal feelings on carry licenses... do you support them
Let's change this up! You show documentation that the BOR's applied to the States! Prove me wrong!! And not just your opinion!
And you just admitted you do nothing!
1 I wont ever change your mind because you believe in your heart in the restrictions.
And let's see.
The 10th amendment goes a little something like this:
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
So looks like it leaves anything not covered by the constitution up to the states,....
Damn I guess you got me there, cause there is no amendment in the constitution that says the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Damn well looks like I los... oh wait that's the 2nd amendment......
But anyways let's change it up again
Do you support carry licenses?
And still waiting for evidence of..
Do you support carry licenses?
And still waiting for evidence of..
And you just admitted you do nothing!
I have done enough research
"the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"
Not sure where to find the part that continues that to say "unless the state wants to infringe then game on"
Yes as far as the Federal Government!
Have you ever looked a State Constitutions?
Here I did some of your homework for you!
40 States have Constitutional Right to Bear Arms
Alabama: "That every citizen has a right to bear arms in defense of himself and the state." Ala. Const. art. I, § 26. Alaska: "A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free ...www.guntrustlawyer.com
40 States have Constitutional Right to Bear Arms
by David M. Goldman
Alabama: “That every citizen has a right to bear arms in defense of himself and the state.” Ala. Const. art. I, § 26.
Alaska: “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Alaska Const. art. I, § 19.
Arizona: “The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself or the State shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain, or employ an armed body of men.”
Ariz. Const. art. II, § 26.
Arkansas: “The citizens of this State shall have the right to keep and bear arms for their common defense.” Ark. Const. art. II, § 5.
Colorado: “The right of no person to keep and bear arms in defense of his home, person and property, or in aid of the civil power when thereto legally summoned, shall be called in question;
but nothing herein contained shall be construed to justify the practice of carrying concealed weapons.” Colo. Const. art. II, § 13.
Connecticut: “Every citizen has a right to bear arms in defense of himself and the state.” Conn. Const. art. I, § 15.
Deleware: Article One, Section 20 of the Delaware Constitution: “Section 20. A person has the right to keep and bear arms for the defense of self, family, home and State, and for hunting and recreational use.”
Florida: “The right of the people to keep and bear arms in defense of themselves and of the lawful authority of the state shall not be infringed, except that the manner of bearing arms may be regulated by law.” Fla. Const. art. I, § 8.
Georgia: “The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed, but the General Assembly shall have the power to prescribe the manner in which arms may be borne.” Ga. Const. art. I, § 1, para. 5.
Hawaii: “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Hawaii Const. art. I, § 15.
Idaho: “The people have the right to keep and bear arms, which right shall not be abridged; but this provision shall not prevent the passage of laws to govern the carrying of weapons concealed on the person nor prevent passage of legislation providing minimum sentences for crimes committed while in possession of a firearm, nor prevent the passage of legislation providing penalties for the possession of firearms by a convicted felon, nor prevent the passage of any legislation punishing the use of a firearm. No law shall impose licensure, registration or special taxation on the ownership or possession of firearms or ammunition. Nor shall any law permit the confiscation of firearms, except those actually used in the commission of a felony.” Idaho Const. art. I, § 11.
Illinois: “Subject only to the police power, the right of the individual citizen to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Ill. Const. art. I, § 22.
Indiana: “The people shall have a right to bear arms, for the defense of themselves and the State.” Ind. Const. art. I, § 32.
Kansas: “The people have the right to bear arms for their defense and security; but standing armies, in time of peace,
are dangerous to liberty, and shall not be tolerated, and the military shall be in strict subordination to the civil power.” Kan. Const., Bill of Rights, § 4.
Kentucky: “All men are, by nature, free and equal,
and have certain inherent and inalienable rights, among which may be reckoned: … Seventh: The right to bear arms in defense of themselves and of the State, subject to the power of the General Assembly to enact laws to prevent persons from carrying concealed weapons.” Ky. Const. § I, para. 7.
Louisiana: “The right of each citizen to keep and bear arms shall not be abridged, but this provision shall not prevent the passage of laws to prohibit the carrying of weapons concealed on the person.” La. Const. art. I, § 11.
Maine: “Every citizen has a right to keep and bear arms for the common defense; and this right shall never be questioned.” Me. Const. art. I, § 16.
Massachusetts: “The people have a right to keep and bear arms for the common defense. And as, in times of peace, armies are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be maintained without the consent of the legislature; and the military power shall always be held in an exact subordination to the civil authority, and be governed by it.” Mass. Const. pt. I, art. XVII.
Michigan: “Every person has a right to keep or bear arms for the defense of himself and the State.” Mich. Const. art. I, § 6.
Mississippi: “The right of every citizen to keep and bear arms in defense of his home, person, or property, or in aid of the civil power where thereto legally summoned, shall not be called in question, but the legislature may regulate or forbid carrying concealed weapons.” Miss. Const. art. III, § 12.
Missouri: “That the right of every citizen to keep and bear arms in defense of his home, person and property, or when lawfully summoned in aid of the civil power, shall not be questioned;
but this shall not justify the wearing of concealed weapons.” Mo. Const. art. I, § 23.
Montana: “The right of any person to keep or bear arms in defense of his own home, person, and property, or in aid of the civil power when thereto legally summoned, shall not be called in question, but nothing herein contained shall be held to permit the carrying of concealed weapons.” Mont. Const. art. II, § 12.
Nebraska: “… and the right to keep and bear arms for security or defense of self, family, home and others, and for lawful common defense, hunting, recreational use, and all other lawful purposes, and such rights shall not be denied or infringed by the state or any subdivision thereof..” N.E. Article 1 (Bill of Rights) Sec 1
Nevada: “Every citizen has the right to keep and bear arms for security and defense, for lawful hunting and recreational use and for other lawful purposes.” Nev. Const. art. I, § 11(1).
New Hampshire: “All persons have the right to keep and bear arms in defense of themselves, their families, their property, and the State.” N.H. Const. pt. I, art. 2a.
New Mexico: “No law shall abridge the right of the citizen to keep and bear arms for security and defense, for lawful hunting and recreational use and for other lawful purposes, but nothing herein shall be held to permit the carrying of concealed weapons.” N.M. Const. art. II, § 6.
North Carolina: “A well regulated militia being necessary to be the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; and, as standing armies in time of peace are dangerous to liberty, they shall not be maintained, and the military shall be kept under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power. Nothing herein shall justify the practice of carrying concealed weapons, or prevent the General Assembly from enacting penal statutes against that practice.” N.C. Const. art. I, § 30.
Ohio: “The people have the right to bear arms for their defense and security; but standing armies, in time of peace, are dangerous to liberty, and shall not be kept up; and the military shall be in strict subordination to the civil power.” Ohio Const. art. I, § 4.
Oklahoma: “The right of a citizen to keep and bear arms in defense of his home, person, or property, or in aid of the civil power, when thereunto legally summoned, shall never be prohibited; but nothing herein contained shall prevent the Legislature from regulating the carrying of weapons.” Okla. Const. art. II, § 26.
Oregon: “The people shall have the right to bear arms for the defence of themselves, and the State, but the Military shall be kept in strict subordination to the civil power.” Or. Const. art. I, § 27.
Pennsylvania: “The right of the citizens to bear arms in defence of themselves and the State shall not be questioned.” Pa. Const. art. I, § 21.
Rhode Island: “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” R.I. Const. art. I, § 22.
South Carolina: “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. As, in times of peace,
armies are dangerous to liberty, they shall not be maintained without the consent of the General Assembly. The military power of the State shall always be held in subordination to the civil authority and be governed by it. No soldier shall in time of peace be quartered in any house without the consent of the owner nor in time of war but in the manner prescribed by law.” S.C. Const. art. I, § 20.
South Dakota: “The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the state shall not be denied.” S.D. Const. art. VI, § 24.
Tennessee: “That the citizens of this State have a right to keep and bear arms for their common defense; but the Legislature shall have power, by law, to regulate the wearing of arms with a view to prevent crime.” Tenn. Const. art. I, § 26.
Texas: “Every citizen shall have the right to keep and bear arms in the lawful defence of himself or the State; but the Legislature shall have power, by law, to regulate the wearing of arms, with a view to prevent crime.” Tex. Const. art. I, § 23.
Utah: “The people have the right to bear arms for their security and defense, but the Legislature may regulate the exercise of this right by law.” Utah Const. art. I, § 6.
Vermont: “That the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and the State–and as standing armies in time of peace are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be kept up; and that the military should be kept under strict subordination to and governed by the civil power.” Vt. Const. Ch. I, art. 16.
Virginia: “That a well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state, therefore, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power.” Va. Const. art. I, § 13.
Washington: “The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain, or employ an armed body of men.” Wash. Const. art. I, § 24.
Wisconsin: “The people have the right to keep and bear arms for security,
defense, hunting, recreation or any other lawful purpose.”
Wyoming: “The right of citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and of the state shall not be denied.” Wyo. Const. art. I, § 24
Posted in: FAQ's and Firearms Case Law
Updated: March 9, 2015 3:36 pm
Comments are closed.
« Previous | Home | Next »
You may notice that some States banned CCW !
So tell me again about the research you have done!
Do you support carry licenses?
And still waiting for evidence of..
And you just admitted you do nothing!
Oh so because states have infringed, that means infringements are ok in your book?
Again shall not be infringed.. i cant seem to find the part in there that says unless it's the states infringing then go for it....
Man King George would have loved your statist/loyalist attitude.
Also wait for it..
Please show us documentation that the BOR's applied to the the states!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And you just admitted you do nothing!
10th amendment.
Right of the people
This is simple even a statist like you should understand
Tenth Amendment
Tenth Amendment Annotated
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
I guess that is not clear to you?
Do you support carry licenses?
And still waiting for evidence of..
And you just admitted you do nothing!
Right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Oh wait hmm sure sounds like its prohibiting infringements
What does the Tenth Amendment really mean?
Is it not any more simple ten that?
- Tenth Amendment. noun. an amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights, guaranteeing to the states and the people those rights that are not delegated to the federal government by the Constitution.
Do you @nortatoga support carry licenses?
And still waiting for evidence of.. and I quote
And you just admitted you do nothing!
Top not delegated to the federal government.
Guess what's already been "delegated"
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED..
Sorry young man, But what was not delegated to the Federal Government was the ability to INFRINGE!
Please show were that was applied to the STATES!!!!!
Do you @nortatoga support carry licenses?
And still waiting for evidence of.. and I quote
And you just admitted you do nothing!
So let me get this straight... the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed unless the states do so.
That is the 2nd amendment?
And weird you still wont answer my questions? How about I ask just one more,
Why wont you answer my questions.
You are right I will not answer a ? that has nothing to do with this discussion at this time!!
And still waiting for evidence of.. and I quote
And you just admitted you do nothing!
The words “its powers” clearly refer back to the Constitution. The Bill of Rights was intended to “prevent misconstruction or abuse” of the Constitution’s powers as exercised through “the government” – the federal government. Notice the word government is not plural. The Bill of Rights makes no mention of state governments. In fact, the state ratifying conventions had no intention of restricting their state’s own powers. They already had state constitutions to do that job.THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.
Interestingly, when James Madison introduced the Bill of Rights to Congress, he proposed that the equal right of conscience, freedom of the press and the right to a trial by jury should also apply to the states.The constitution was ordained and established by the people of the United States for themselves, for their own government, and not for the government of the individual states. Each state established a constitution for itself, and in that constitution, provided such limitations and restrictions on the powers of its particular government, as its judgment dictated. The people of the United States framed such a government for the United States as they supposed best adapted to their situation and best calculated to promote their interests. The powers they conferred on this government were to be exercised by itself; and the limitations on power, if expressed in general terms, are naturally, and, we think, necessarily, applicable to the government created by the instrument. They are limitations of power granted in the instrument itself; not of distinct governments, framed by different persons and for different purposes.
If these propositions be correct, the fifth amendment must be understood as restraining the power of the general government, not as applicable to the states. In their several constitutions, they have imposed such restrictions on their respective governments, as their own wisdom suggested; such as they deemed most proper for themselves. It is a subject on which they judge exclusively, and with which others interfere no further than they are supposed to have a common interest.
Congress explicitly rejected applying those particular amendments to the states, making it abundantly clear that the Bill of Rights was only intended to limit federal power.I wish also, in revising the constitution, we may throw into that section, which interdicts the abuse of certain powers in the state legislatures, some other provisions of equal if not greater importance than those already made. The words, “No state shall pass any bill of attainder, ex post facto law, &c.” were wise and proper restrictions in the constitution. I think there is more danger of those powers being abused by the state governments than by the government of the United States. The same may be said of other powers which they possess, if not controuled by the general principle, that laws are unconstitutional which infringe the rights of the community. I should therefore wish to extend this interdiction, and add, as I have stated in the 5th resolution, that no state shall violate the equal right of conscience, freedom of the press, or trial by jury in criminal cases; because it is proper that every government should be disarmed of powers which trench upon those particular rights.
And still waiting for evidence of.. and I quote
And you just admitted you do nothing!
You can post all the statist bull shit you want doesn't mean it's correct. Again King George would have loved you, I bet you look amazing in red
You are right I will not answer a ? that has nothing to do with this discussion at this time!!
I will say at the least you have kept this respectable!
I mean you posting things to justify infringements is just that.. statist bullshit.
Really is it Statist to understand History?
Is it Statist to understand that the BOR's did not apply to the States before the SCOTUS incorporated them to the STATES?
Lmao "right of the people" but doesnt apply to what the people that live in a state?
Again push you statist arguments somewhere else, but that's all they are statist arguments to justify how overly comfortable you are with infringements
I am sorry for you! I thought you to be more intelligent I was wrong!!!
And still waiting for evidence of.. and I quote
And you just admitted you do nothing!