You are not getting it. The other charges are irrelevant.Show me in the NY Safe Act where the charges of Falsification of Business Records and Grand Larceny are found...
You're pulling a typical "fast one" here. If he were charged solely with Safe Act charges then you'd have a significantly valid point but alas he's not and his criminal acts have nothing to do with me or anyone else who knows better than to tie the legal fortunes of the many to the successes and failures of the criminal class.
If I was caught drinking and driving AND with 11 rounds in a mag and I KNEW both were illegal I wouldn't seek or expect ANY support from anyone. It's YOU that don't get it.You are not getting it. The other charges are irrelevant.
Ok. If you yourself, "Chuck D" got charged with with DWI and and also for having 11 rounds in a magazine, should the NRA, us, and whatever 2A attorney who thinks the magazine charge is unconstitutional say that it is okay for you to face that one particular gun charge because you got caught drinking while driving?
If you can't answer the question honestly, don't answer it.
Tried not to get that involved but some of you can't read between the lines or do your own legwork.Wow sure was easy getting that out of you.
...and you neglect the rest . That's called avoidance.So if you got arrested for 11 rounds in a magazine and no other charge, you'd want 2A defense.
However, if you got arrested for 11 rounds in s magazine and DWI, you are a big boy and shouldn't be defended.
That's what I'm getting from you. So no. Unfortunately, I do not get it.
So...if my assumption is correct and you are sworn to protect and serve. You advocate willful breaking of law.Funny thing about that Federal Constitution, well at least for those of us that swore to protect and defend it against all enemies forgiven and domestic, that includes people that say things we do not agree with, worship god's we do not believe in, sell guns that are legal everywhere else, etc., etc., etc..
Robin
Let me ask you this. If NY and only NY declared all guns illegal, will you blindly follow because it's the law? If Cuomo declared first rights to any newlywed, would you follow because it's the law?So...if my assumption is correct and you are sworn to protect and serve. You advocate willful breaking of law.
Ok...now it makes sense.
Patricia Marks isn't mentioned here. If she's still involved that's good news for the defendant.
So...if my assumption is correct and you are sworn to protect and serve. You advocate willful breaking of law.
Ok...now it makes sense.
Let me ask you this. If NY and only NY declared all guns illegal, will you blindly follow because it's the law? If Cuomo declared first rights to any newlywed, would you follow because it's the law?
Senseless drivel....you enforce law. Want to make law....run for office.What is to assume? I clearly stated "for those of us that swore...". Apparently in your oath, you are to "serve", so you work at Burger King and will serve it their way(?), that's a good lad.
Whatever makes sense to you would probably be lost on the greater population of the globe, or at least those Trump voters that will admit to such.
Robin Smartas
We are now three pages in of 'Do your own research' etc. Whatever. This guy might be the worst prick in the world, and all your posts have done is to make me support him...and I'm definitely not a 'F the man' kind of person.Senseless drivel....you enforce law. Want to make law....run for office.
I was waiting for it. I knew you would go that route.Let me ask you this ...if unicorns frolicked ......
Lead my example. Either be a lawbreaker in a manner.that is transparent or get off the soapbox. Practice what you preach.
Wow....thought that one up all by yourself didn't ya.You should stick to what you know best which is rapping because defending the constitution isn't one of them. The Constitution applies to everyone.
Thank you.Wow....thought that one up all by yourself didn't ya.
Impressed.
Welcome...now go back and reread the post where I said I hope he beats the Safe Act rap and gets locked up for the rest...go a long way to repairing your and others credibility.Thank you.
But you will not support him so it's an oxymoron. Go back and reread your posts before hand.Welcome...now go back and reread the post where I said I hope he beats the Safe Act rap and gets locked up for the rest...go a long way to repairing your and others credibility.
I know exactly what I said. He will never get my support. Show me an actual Safe Act victim like David Lewis....they are worthy of my support. Kory isn't.But you will not support him so it's an oxymoron. Go back and reread your posts before hand.
Yeeeeeesssss, I'll bet your masters are pleased. Tell me, does thinking give you a headache?
Robin Smartas
Fair enough. The Constitution should apply to only some people you approve of.I know exactly what I said. He will never get my support. Show me an actual Safe Act victim like David Lewis....they are worthy of my support. Kory isn't.
Merry Christmas to you and yours.
The Constitution obviously applies to everyone especially the victims of crime.Fair enough. The Constitution should apply to only some people you approve of.
Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! And may your next 4 years bring you Constitutional Happiness!