Gun Humor thread

Tisto

Tisto

.308 Win
Messages
3,681
Reaction score
6,180
Location
Tonawanda
Steal2B said:
View attachment 74556

www.thefirearmblog.com

Bullets collided in mid air?

A look at collided bullets.
www.thefirearmblog.com www.thefirearmblog.com

www.greatwarforum.org

Photo of two bullets collided mid air

I follow a Twitter feed called Historical Pics (@HistoricalPics) This photo appeared this morning and is said to be ' Two collided bullets from the Battle of Gallipoli, 1915-1916' Nil other info re source etc. I have absolutely no idea if this sort of thing is feasable and thought I'd share it he...
www.greatwarforum.org www.greatwarforum.org

Did you miss the point ... And Epstein still did not kill himself?
Click to expand...
Don't misunderstand - I'm not saying that 2 bullets could not collide in mid-air, what I'm saying is that THOSE TWO bullets didn't. Only one of them has rifling marks on it. The other one does not, meaning that it was never fired. If they BOTH had rifling marks, it would be more convincing. Even then, I would be skeptical - chances of it happening 1 in a billion ? Chances of someone finding it ? 1 in how many trillion ?

Also, wouldn't it seem much more likely that bullets colliding in mid-air would tend to hit head-on instead of at a 90°angle to each other ? Usually in a war, most opponents are shooting in one direction, and the other side is returning fire from roughly the exact opposite direction.


I understand that bullets haven collided in mid-air were recovered from Gettysburg. This is more plausable, since the bullets were considerably larger in diameter, and traveling considerably slower. Add to that, the entire Gettysburg area has been gone over with metal detectors for the past 100 years.


I'm STILL calling BS on your picture.


Don't get mad, it's just the way I am.
 
GOPerfect

GOPerfect

.950 JDJ
U.S. Military
Messages
32,028
Reaction score
73,673
Location
No longer Secret, thanks DR. Evil
Tisto said:
I have to call BS on this one. One bullet clearly has rifling marks on it. The other does not. Sorry, but this is a set-up. Those bullets did not miraculously collide in mid-air.
Click to expand...
'
\


Real, yes, but not in the way you think.
One projectile was fired. There are rifling marks on that one.
The other projectile has no rifling marks. It was not fired.
In other words, one projectile was fired into a cartridge that was at rest, perhaps in an ammunition storage area.
 
Tisto

Tisto

.308 Win
Messages
3,681
Reaction score
6,180
Location
Tonawanda
GOPerfect said:
'
\


Real, yes, but not in the way you think.
One projectile was fired. There are rifling marks on that one.
The other projectile has no rifling marks. It was not fired.
In other words, one projectile was fired into a cartridge that was at rest, perhaps in an ammunition storage area.
Click to expand...

Yes. NOT hit mid-air.
 
MothMan

MothMan

.338 Win Mag
Messages
6,892
Reaction score
12,404
Location
Point Pleasant, WV
Tisto said:
Don't misunderstand - I'm not saying that 2 bullets could not collide in mid-air, what I'm saying is that THOSE TWO bullets didn't. Only one of them has rifling marks on it. The other one does not, meaning that it was never fired. If they BOTH had rifling marks, it would be more convincing. Even then, I would be skeptical - chances of it happening 1 in a billion ? Chances of someone finding it ? 1 in how many trillion ?

Also, wouldn't it seem much more likely that bullets colliding in mid-air would tend to hit head-on instead of at a 90°angle to each other ? Usually in a war, most opponents are shooting in one direction, and the other side is returning fire from roughly the exact opposite direction.


I understand that bullets haven collided in mid-air were recovered from Gettysburg. This is more plausable, since the bullets were considerably larger in diameter, and traveling considerably slower. Add to that, the entire Gettysburg area has been gone over with metal detectors for the past 100 years.


I'm STILL calling BS on your picture.


Don't get mad, it's just the way I am.
Click to expand...
92EDF37C-8071-4263-93C9-1BF6FC72DC2B.jpeg
 
Steal2B

Steal2B

.700 Nitro Express
Messages
25,847
Reaction score
81,843
Location
Dutchess County
Tisto said:
Don't misunderstand - I'm not saying that 2 bullets could not collide in mid-air, what I'm saying is that THOSE TWO bullets didn't. Only one of them has rifling marks on it. The other one does not, meaning that it was never fired. If they BOTH had rifling marks, it would be more convincing. Even then, I would be skeptical - chances of it happening 1 in a billion ? Chances of someone finding it ? 1 in how many trillion ?

Also, wouldn't it seem much more likely that bullets colliding in mid-air would tend to hit head-on instead of at a 90°angle to each other ? Usually in a war, most opponents are shooting in one direction, and the other side is returning fire from roughly the exact opposite direction.


I understand that bullets haven collided in mid-air were recovered from Gettysburg. This is more plausable, since the bullets were considerably larger in diameter, and traveling considerably slower. Add to that, the entire Gettysburg area has been gone over with metal detectors for the past 100 years.


I'm STILL calling BS on your picture.


Don't get mad, it's just the way I am.
Click to expand...
Not mad. You just did not get it and was trying to get you to read the punch line. No arguements here.

Third try ... Epstein killing himself?
 
Last edited:
Tisto

Tisto

.308 Win
Messages
3,681
Reaction score
6,180
Location
Tonawanda
Steal2B said:
Not mad. You just did not get it and was trying to get you to read the punch line. No arguements here.

Third try ... Epstein killing himself?
Click to expand...

No, I actually got the joke the first time I read it. I just giggled a bit and went into ''analyze the picture" mode.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top